User talk:RBR Account

This is RBR Account's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Buzuayehu Tadele Bizenu (March 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not satisfying our main standards.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:RBR Account/sandbox/Buzuayehu Tadele Bizenu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 07:15, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:RBR Account/sandbox/Buzuayehu Tadele Bizenu has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:RBR Account/sandbox/Buzuayehu Tadele Bizenu. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 09:05, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Buzuayehu Tadele Bizenu, from its old location at User:RBR Account/sandbox/Buzuayehu Tadele Bizenu. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 13:03, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Buzuayehu Tadele Bizenu (March 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GeneralizationsAreBad was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Buzuayehu Tadele Bizenu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GAB^gab 20:16, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! RBR Account, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GAB^gab 20:16, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Buzuayehu Tadele Bizenu (March 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrStrauss was:

Improvement has been made on last submission which is positive, however please see WP:NPOV in order to further improve the article. More independent sources are also needed to establish the subject's notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Buzuayehu Tadele Bizenu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DrStrauss talk 12:30, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked Account

Dear Jim, I would like to know why my account is blocked since I am still working on the revisions from the recommendations of the editors. How can I proceed on improving my article if my account is blocked. Needing your consideration. Thank you. RBR Account (talk) 13:57, 13 March 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

RBR Account (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #17758 was submitted on Mar 13, 2017 14:16:36. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 14:16, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal to remove blocking on my account

Dear Editors,

This is to seek your considerations to unblocked my account. I had gone thru the discussions I've read about the accounts I created (EAHSC_Bizenu & RBR_Account) which apparently I had a mistake in properly managing the EAHSC_Bizenu since I thought of having this as my experimental account only. I made the RBR_Account for the 2nd time to finally gone thru the assigned task for me which it complicates the situation.

As I am going thru with all the wiki policies, though it requires focus and thorough understanding to your policies, gradually, I started to appreciate the value of the restrictions which this provide reliability and credibility of any information posted in Wikipedia. I sincerely apologize for neglecting your warnings and violating your policies. This will be definitely improved in the future and do my best to comply with your guidelines.

This is why I am seeking your consideration and appeal to unblocked my account (RBR_Account). For EAHSC_Bizenu, I am thinking if it's possible to delete that particular account so it wont cause conflict of interest to my current account.

For your reference, here is the link of my current account: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:RBR_Account

Hoping for your understanding and consideration.

Thank you. RBR Account (talk) 06:23, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal to Unblocked my Account

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RBR Account (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Editors, This is to seek your considerations to unblocked my account. I had gone thru the discussions I've read about the accounts I created (EAHSC_Bizenu & RBR_Account) which apparently I had a mistake in properly managing the EAHSC_Bizenu since I thought of having this as my experimental account only. I made the RBR_Account for the 2nd time to finally gone thru the assigned task for me which it complicates the situation. As I am going thru with all the wiki policies, though it requires focus and thorough understanding to your policies, gradually, I started to appreciate the value of the restrictions which this provide reliability and credibility of any information posted in Wikipedia. I sincerely apologize for neglecting your warnings and violating your policies. This will be definitely improved in the future and do my best to comply with your guidelines. This is why I am seeking your consideration and appeal to unblocked my account (RBR_Account). For EAHSC_Bizenu, I am thinking if it's possible to delete that particular account so it wont cause conflict of interest to my current account. For your reference, here is the link of my current account: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:RBR_Account Hoping for your understanding and consideration. Thank you.

Decline reason:

You seem to misunderstand WP:COI. I suggest you read that policy because it's very, very important. Just deleting your other account (which is not possible anyway) would not have any effect whatsoever on your conflict of interest. Yamla (talk) 12:25, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

2nd Appeal to Unblocked my Account

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RBR Account (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Editors, As per the recommendation of Yamla, regarding on giving importance to your COI Policy, I was able to review your specific guidelines and appropriate rules in posting article especially for living persons. This contradicts to the article I posted in my account. Furthermore, prior to posting anything, I need to be extra cautious with the information I will be posting and review thoroughly the content. Again, I am seeking your consideration to unblocked my account. This will give me more opportunities to improve my articles in the future and this as well imparts learning and awareness on my side. Thank you very much for being patient.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it is clear that your purpose in asking to be unblocked is to continue your attempts to create a promotional article about a person you have a paid connection to, which is contrary both to Wikipedia's policy on promotion and to the conflict of interest guidelines. You are not going to be unblocked in order to give you a chance to do things which are against Wikipedia policy. Also, if you can write stuff such as "a visionary businessman from a family of entrepreneur", "armed with vision & entrepreneurship", "dynamic and vibrant", and then sincerely say that you have not been writing to promote, then you are so unable to see the nature of your own writing that it is unlikely you will be able to switch to writing neutrally. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:55, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Are you Buzuayehu Tadele Bizenu? Of not, do you have any connection to him or his company? You have to properly disclose your wp:conflict of interest if you want to be unblocked. Also, you have to tell us what kind of edits you intend to make if unblocked. Do you intend to continue promoting Bizenu and EAHSC? Vanjagenije (talk) 17:46, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vanjagenije, I am not sure if you will received this reply since I cannot answer you back through talk page. I encounter permission error due to blocked account. Honestly, I want to fully comply with your COI policy and also to disclose this issue. Buzuayehu Tadele Bizenu is my boss which I was task to create a biography for him. It is not my intention to promote Bizenu or EAHSC which I think the article I made pertains to that intention. Apparently, I want your advise and opinion on this concern for me to know what to do and how to proceed.

I need your advise please..— Preceding unsigned comment added by RBR Account (talk • contribs) 14:11, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm WP:watching this page, so you can write me here. You can also WP:ping me to be sure I'l see your message. I deactivated your second unblock request because the previous one is still pending. You still have not answered what kind of edits you intend to make if unblocked. If you intend to continue writing about Bizenu, you will not be unblocked because WP:COI editing is strongly discouraged. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:27, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RBR Account (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

User: Vanjagenije Hi Vanjagenije, Thank you for your patience and your time dealing with my issues. As referred to BLPs guidelines and noticeboard, I completely understand your side about the COI policy I violated. Honestly, it is not my intention to create a promotional article. I only want to post a Biography of Mr. Bizenu which turns out to violate the writing style policy of Wikipedia. My sincere apology. As far as I wanted to modify Mr. Bizenu’s article to comply with the BLPs criteria and policy, If you suggest that Mr. Buzuayehu’s article cannot be acceptable to post in Wiki, then I will respect that. As an alternative, I am thinking if I can seek advice some leeway to permit to allow me to post which will not violate administrative issues and appropriate for my intention.

Decline reason:

You are not going to be unblocked if you only intend to write about Mr Bizenu, since you have already demonstrated that you are not capable of doing so in accordance with Wikipedia's contrent policies. Until you explain what areas of Wikipedia you intend to edit instead, this block will remain in place. Yunshui ^雲 _水 13:42, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RBR Account (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Editors, To provide you an explanation what areas of Wikipedia I intend to edit, these are my plans in trying to fix the problem on my article and how to improve and correct the article. 1. I will write neutrally and with fair point of view to avoid bias 2. I will remove poorly outsourced material and produce reliable and independent sources to support each assertion I make 3. I will remove inappropriate information that leads to promotions or advertisement 4. I will declare the edited article to associated discussions page to heed the advice of other editors I am hoping that this explanation can offer a positive and more objective perspective regarding my request. Thank you very much. RBR Account (talk) 07:13, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have been told repeatedly that you will not be allowed to write about your boss, but you have repeatedly ignored that and continued with your attempts to do so. To prevent any further waste of volunteer time, I have revoked your ability to edit this talk page. See WP:UTRS if you wish to make a further appeal. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:44, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.