User talk:RB972

Welcome!

Hello, RB972, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Very odd a populated talk page and no one welcomed you - thanks for your reversion of the vandalism to Wayang SatuSuro 13:16, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

earlier posts

RB972, despite what you may think, you don't know the man you're persecuting like I do, so YOU discontinue posting your crap, or I'll take measures you'll regret. [this comment was left by user:Trustjms -RB972]

I'm just posting the facts. I believe every individual has the right to come to their own conclusions. You'll take measures? Like what? RB972 04:22, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Jungmyungseok.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jungmyungseok.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:33, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jung Myung Seok page

Thank you for reporting Trustjms on WP:AIV. There seems to be some controversies on the Jung Myung Seok page. However, please refrain from making personal attacks as you did on the talk page — "These cult guys sure are nuts." Comment on content, not on the editors. — ERcheck (talk) 15:34, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for helping! Actually, that comment was not made by me, but I will pass your warning on to the one who made it. RB972 15:39, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. When all editors don't sign their posts, it is sometimes confusing who said what. Thanks for not taking offense at my misplaced warning; I do appreciate that you will pass it along. And, as you may have noted, the reported editor has been blocked for trolling. (BTW, I mistakenly posted this info to your user page. I've moved it to your talk page and will remove it from your user page.) — ERcheck (talk) 15:49, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Jung 06April news conference.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jung 06April news conference.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:06, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Providence (religion)

The article you wrote, Providence (religion), is uncategorized. Please help improve it by adding it to one or more categories, so it may be associated with related articles. A stub marker or other template doesn't count - please put in an actual category in the article. Eli Falk 10:55, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

about drew rosen. AND TO i dont care if u think it is vand. its the truth, and if you watch football you would know that. eaglemaneagles

they werent supposed to. i hate TO and Rosen. ima eagles fan, and i think taht the world should know wat these guys did to us. i remeember one time therre was a post about don. mcnabb, and it didnt get changed for a week. how come this got changed in to seconds.

that still didnt answer my question about dmac, and anywaqy y do u care

Hey man

You tread in interesting country... best to cultivate a friendship with an admin in your timezone... to look over you shoulder so to speak... :) SatuSuro 11:03, 28 January 2007 (UTC) Wow - just looking at your contribs page - you need flack jacket and armoured backup for that SatuSuro 11:25, 28 January 2007 (UTC) I have quite few admins on my talk page - have a trawl if you need to go separate from standard WP:AIV etc SatuSuro 08:59, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Watching over an article

No question, one of the challenges for Wikipedia is maintaining the quality of an article where only one editor is trying to preserve NPOV. There isn't any guaranteed way that I know of to accomplish this, but I do some suggestions. First, regional noticeboards are a good thing to try; you've done that. Second, if there is a wikiproject related to this (see Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory), you could mention something on their talk page.

Aside: I suggest not going into detail about the rationality or lack thereof of a problem editor, but rather saying that there is an NPOV problem with one editor, and though it has stopped in the past few days, you're concerned that it might become an issue in the future. What you'd like to do is have a couple more editors put the article on their watchlist. [It's on mine, but then, so are a lot of other pages.]

A third possibility is to look through the article history for edits by other constructive editors. I did this, and found two editors who are (more-or-less) still active: User:CaptPorridge and User:AirBa. I suggest you drop them a note and ask them to help.

A fourth possibility is to check similar articles (Reverend Moon?) and find a couple of editors who seem simpatico; drop them a note with a complement and ask them if they would mind occasionally helping out at this article as well.

Fifth, if this continues to me a matter between just you and one other editor, it qualifies for Wikipedia:Third opinion, which is a way of attracting other editors to it.

Finally, if things get problematical and you don't see me around, just drop me a note, and I'll see what I can do personally to help. -- John Broughton (☎☎) 13:36, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism tag

I'm pretty sure your tag on User talk:62.224.216.124 didn't work. Check it out? Steevven1 ^{(Talk) (Contributions)} 00:27, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism issue

Hi there, you left These messages on my talk page saying that I have vandalised wikipedia on the page mind even though I have not. My username is not anywhere in the page history, please explain this further. Thanks and please reply on my talk page. Telly addict

My aplogies, it seems a vandal in which you warned (209.244.187.8) has been impersonating you and warning me on my user talk page (shown here) but is writing the message instead of using a template., this showing that its fake. Although this IP wrote your username he/she forgot to add a link to your userpage in your signature. You can tell this was him/her because on his contribs it shows that he/her left a messge on my talk page (shown here). In a detailed look it is shown here. What do you think we should do as he's impersonated you and vandalised wikipedia in general? I'll remove the false warning messages off my talk page as I'm not in the mind page history so I can't of vandalised it. I know this seems hard to understand but do you understand what I mean??. Please reply on my talk page. Cheers!!!! Telly addict 16:25, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's OK, he/she has been blocked now, This was a little clumsy of the user though as you mentioned, like I would warn myself even though I havent vandalised!! I deleted the warnings as they were clearly false on my talk page , also... did you ask the admin MrDarcy to block the user??? Cheers for your help. // Telly addict 21:12, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Slipknot Image Test

Hello, I don't remember ever editing a slipknot image, can you please tell me what the message you sent me was referring to. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 211.26.48.57 (talk) 11:33, 1 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

In case you come on with another IP I replied here. RB9 7 2 19:56, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, RB972! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 18:44, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion in Stryker (disc jockey)

I wasn't really looking for a lecture on notability, though it's always good to be reminded of it no matter how many times I've seen it before. Thank you for your thoughtful advice and comments. I still agree with WP:IAR (that "If a citation does not meet the guidelines for reliable sources, it does not necessarily mean it's unusable.") and in this context the the petition can be a useful citation. However, now that I kind of sit and think about it I'm not really defending the petition because I think that's a good argument, I'm doing it because the conversation between myself and Jimmycracker got so personal. In a way, agreeing with him would not just be about changing an article but admitting that he was right to call me an idiot, crazy, or a troll. I'm not going to say that on the talk page, but I thought I'd let you know and give you props for your conflict resolution skillz. :) -- Craigtalbert 11:38, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

JMS

Thanks for your great help. I will try to keep up with the page. I translated some poorly written news in Chinese, and hoped that a small piece of jigsaw would be available to international community. There are a lot of sources in Korean and Japanese seem more solid and credible than my sources, unfortunately I know neither Korean nor Japanese.AirBa 02:30, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting vandalism

Hi RB972, I ran into you a few times reverting vandalism. I'd like to ask that you examine the edit history when performing reverts to ensure the last good version is restored. On Scotch College, Melbourne in particular I saw that some of your reversions didn't catch everything. This sometimes allows vandalism to slip through and makes it hard to determine where to revert later on. Hope this helps. -SpuriousQ (talk) 10:46, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User 195.195.235.12

I have noticed that at User talk:195.195.235.12 you have left a warning indicating if this user vandalized again, the user would be blocked. On February 6th, 2007, he vandalized Dartfish, as can be seen here: http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Dartfish&action=history. I have left him a warning, but as he has vandalized before and had last warnings, I think he should be blocked. I am not an admin, and cannot block him. Do you know how to have him blocked? Thanks. - MSTCrow 03:23, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've reported it at WP:AIV. If it had been promptly reported (I don't know for sure that it wasn't, but I'm doubtful), it probably would have resulted in a week-long block. As it is now, it's probably 50-50 whether an admin will do something (and the only reason they might is because of the two prior blocks; otherwise, this report is quite stale.) -- John Broughton (♫♫) 16:03, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jung Myung Seok edit war

Hello, I have de-listed the dispute at WP:3O and requested edit protection for that article until things have been cleared up. It might take a little until I have fully appreciated the situation and give my opinion on the talk page, but here are already a few things, I'd like you to consider:

Third opinion requests have to be neutrally worded, no matter what blatant policy violations might have occurred. "Content dispute at Talk:Jung Myung Seok." would have sufficed.

Upon closer inspection of the article's history, one might find both, you and QCA in 3RR violation. You're not alone here on Wikipedia, especially if policies are being violated. Do not invest yourself in revert warring but try to get a third party involved before you might find yourself under administrative scrutiny as well.

Take care - Cyrus XIII 20:12, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have requested admin review at WP:AN/I of this case of possible sock puppetry. Until the request is reviewed, and as long as the page protection stays in place, I suggest that you work on some other articles. And do heed Cyrus's advice - while it's commendable that you're spending the time and efforts to keep this article to Wikipedia standards, you also need to trust the system - don't violate 3RR (or any other rule) because you feel you have to.

The article is on my watch list, but so are more than 1000 other pages, so if feel you need another editor to get involved immediately (more or less), just drop me a note; I'll notice that faster than a change on my watchlist.

Similarly, since Cyrus XIII has become involved, you should feel free to drop him a neutral note in the future, something like "Hi - things seem to be heating up again at Jung Myung Seok - would you mind taking a look at some recent edits?", if you feel you need the eyes of more editors. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 16:49, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just for the record, I didn't purposely violate 3RR, I violated it by a minute and undid it when I realised (though I reverted some time later again). RB9 7 2 03:28, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RB972, just to let you now that QCA (talk · contribs) has added your username on WP:RFC/USER, probably useful for you to know. --Van helsing 21:14, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bizarre. If QCA does in fact fill out the form correctly (that is, lists himself and at least one other editor as having a problem with you), please let me know; I'd like to add some comments there about puppets, whether sock or meat. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 21:49, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made to Aaron Russell

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, RB972! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bpurevolume\.com\/, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 08:30, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Anti-Christ and Antichrist

I noticed you made basically the same change to both of these pages. I wonder if you care to chime in on the dicussion about merging the articles? --Mattarata 06:47, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations

Hello RB972. You may not know me, but I would like to congratulate you and present you with a medal. You are now a journeyman editor. Harrison-HB4026 04:01, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This editor is a **Journeyman Editor**, and is entitled to display this **Service Badge**

Image:Jung_sermon.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jung_sermon.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rette tast 22:17, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Jung 06April news conference.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Jung 06April news conference.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. β^_command 21:59, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Jung lettertojung.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Jung lettertojung.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. β^_command 21:59, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jung formermem assault.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jung formermem assault.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:03, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

all yours

User:RB972 /List of convicted or indicted religious leaders. Very please we've found an acceptable way forward. Thank you for being so constructive here.--Doc^g 02:38, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice new article. If you could expand the paragraph/prose portion of the article somehow to 1,500 characters, it would be a good article for WP:DYK. Cirt (talk) 06:15, 21 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]
- Well, you could always try submitting it to T:TDYK as it is, and see what happens. Cirt (talk) 15:42, 21 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jung sermon.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jung sermon.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:08, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Trevor Marshall

Hi RB972,

Thank you for your interest in the TM page.

One of the frustrating matters with this page is that a lot of work has been done in the spirit of a NPOV yet that tag still remains. Now that you've made a round of changes, is there anything you can do to make that tag go away?

You may notice that the Lassessen page and London pages were deleted from mention at the conclusion of the article, but not by me. Those pages are completely unsourced, unreliable, etc. The Lassessen page for example was written and maintained by a man who was found guilty of libel in a California court of law against the very subject of a biography upon which he intends to comment. That and the absence of any kind of sources should make anyone think twice about linking to his site.

That said, I'm not opposed to any of your other changes.

Palbert (talk) 21:43, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments on Jung Myung Seok

My edits on this article were limited to one, on the talk page, a little over a year ago, removing a posting that I thought violated WP:AGF and did not contribute in any way to moving the dialog further. I also posted a comment on the user talk page of Uptional, suggesting that he/she use the talk page properly.

I'm not familiar with the subject of the article, and - unfortunately - I have other commitments which preclude me from spending the time needed to come up to speed on the matter, and to participate in this discussion. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 00:04, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take another look. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 13:23, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did a very belated posting. My quick look at the page seems to indicate that things are reasonably under control; if not, please drop me another note. Or consider posting a note at WP:EA, particularly for very specific questions.

Regarding this posting by Uptional to the user talk page of Esprit15d, given that Esprit15d is an administrator, I personally wouldn't have worried much. You were right to add your comment, though I think it would have been better addressed to Esprit15d - it is, after all, his/her user talk page - rather than to Uptional (as you might do on an article talk page), simply explaining your position (which you did - blog bad, blog with copy of newspaper article, okay), and then saying "I'd also appreciate any comments you might make here", and not saying anything negative about Uptional. (As a rule of thumb - do not complain about another editor's behavior or motivation unless you want that editor warned or blocked; if there is a content dispute, as was the case here, talk about that. Editor's much prefer to make comments on content issues if they can; you can make it easier for them to jump in IF you don't introduce behavior issues.) -- John Broughton (♫♫) 22:45, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

my Pancake Parlour revert

You're right - I didn't take the time to Google that one since it seemed a little bit out there. I guess even Scientologists love pancakes. Teleomatic (talk) 04:26, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Jung lettertojung.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Jung lettertojung.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:13, 25 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Cirt (talk) 15:13, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed with a count of (166/43/7). I appreciate your comments and in my actions as an administrator I will endeavor to maintain the trust you have placed in me. I am honored by your trust and your support. Thank you, Cirt (talk) 03:12, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Jung exodus founder father.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Jung exodus founder father.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:09, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Providence (religious movement)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Providence (religious movement) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. My76 Strat 06:24, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jung sermon.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jung sermon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 05:56, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jung 06April news conference.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jung 06April news conference.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:27, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jung exodus founder father.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jung exodus founder father.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:28, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I discussion regarding Providence (religious movement)

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive833#Large amount of properly sourced content is being continually deleted from Providence Religious Movement Article. Sam Sailor ^Sing 11:13, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]