User talk:Quick, Spot the Quetzalcoatl!

TR3AL moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, TR3AL, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 14:34, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hasan Namir, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBC. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Content Partners for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Content Partners is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Content Partners until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creep^Talk 07:52, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Hello Quick, Spot the Quetzalcoatl!. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Content Partners, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Quick, Spot the Quetzalcoatl!. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Quick, Spot the Quetzalcoatl!|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. scope_creep^Talk 15:11, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I used their service in the 2000s for some of my television royalties, so I guess you are right (in that they paid me for said royalties). I'll add the disclosure and try to be more careful in the future with editing anything that might have something to do with my income. Thank you. Quick, Spot the Quetzalcoatl! (talk) 17:19, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Quick, Spot the Quetzalcoatl!: Thanks for that. Well, everybody needs feed and a roof over their head. Cool username. scope_creep^Talk 11:28, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Patrick M. Byrne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page OAN.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Braun (designer) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Michael Braun (designer), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:13, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. I saw him on the Savage biography on A&E and thought - that guy's got the coolest story! There are no other sources though, so far as I can tell, but I'll take a look to see if there is something more to satisfy. Quick, Spot the Quetzalcoatl! (talk) 02:35, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A goat for you!

Loved your comment in the RfC at Talk:Donald Trump lol

––FormalDude talk 07:14, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cute little guy there! Quick, Spot the Quetzalcoatl! (talk) 01:43, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Justin Kuritzkes moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Justin Kuritzkes, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more exact citations in detail from reliable, independent sources, in particular substantial reviews in third-party published independent reliable sources, not press releases, blurbs, blogs, Amazon, or Goodreads . (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 04:11, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good to me, I've put it up to AFC if you feel it's not sourced enough yourself :) It was just a quick stub, not planning on spending more time on the thing. Quick, Spot the Quetzalcoatl! (talk) 04:27, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Braun (designer) (September 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by QuantumRealm was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michael Braun (designer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Michael Braun (designer), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Quantum^Realm (meow • pawtrack) 10:11, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Quick, Spot the Quetzalcoatl!! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Quantum^Realm (meow • pawtrack) 10:11, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Justin Kuritzkes has been accepted

Justin Kuritzkes, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Modussiccandi (talk) 17:04, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

Hi Quick, Spot the Quetzalcoatl!. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when using rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war.
If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! ~TheresNoTime ^{(to explain!)} 03:17, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Olga Litvinenko (businesswoman) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Olga Litvinenko (businesswoman) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olga Litvinenko (businesswoman) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

{ [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 11:53, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New message from TheresNoTime

You are invited to join the discussion at User talk:TheresNoTime § Tools. -- TNT (talk • she/her) 19:56, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Quick, Spot the Quetzalcoatl! (talk) 05:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Brett Brochu

The article Brett Brochu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NHOCKEY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Vladimir Dvorkin" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Vladimir Dvorkin and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 2#Vladimir Dvorkin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:49, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Michael Braun (designer)

Hello, Quick, Spot the Quetzalcoatl!. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Michael Braun (designer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:00, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Robert Orr (ice hockey)

The article Robert Orr (ice hockey) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NHOCKEY; having the same name as Bobby Orr and articles detailing that fact does not establish notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Raul Rosas Jr. moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Raul Rosas Jr., is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Cassiopeia talk 08:01, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Raul Rosas Jr.

Quick, Spot the Quetzalcoatl! Should be all good, I added more sources pertaining more to him and not just results and fight announcements. Sending all the best, sorry I am just sick and not in the best mood.HeinzMaster (talk) 21:32, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Matthew Klam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. Albans School.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red

Hi there, Quick, Spot the Quetzalcoatl!, and thank you for all the biographies you have written, especially those about women. As you appear to be keen to cover more women, you might like to become a member of WikiProject Women in Red where we are trying to chip away at the gender gap. If you are interested in becoming a member, you can sign up under "New registrations" on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members. In any case, I look forward to more biographies about women. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 12:10, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of International Academy of Comparative Law

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on International Academy of Comparative Law requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bbb23 (talk) 11:33, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sarah Harding (professor) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sarah Harding (professor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Harding (professor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

AriTheHorse 04:01, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Quick, Spot the Quetzalcoatl!!

Happy New Year!

Quick, Spot the Quetzalcoatl!,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 03:02, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Adam VillaSeñor moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Adam VillaSeñor, is not suitable as written to remain published. We require in depth coverage of the subject in multiple reliable sources, and the sourcing provided does not meet that standard. He has directed one probably notable film, which is not enough to qualify him for a bio on Wikipedia.

I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 05:41, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Women in Entertainment for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Women in Entertainment is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Women in Entertainment until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Nigel757 (talk) 18:24, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Adam VillaSeñor

Hello, Quick, Spot the Quetzalcoatl!. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Adam VillaSeñor".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 04:31, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joel Goodman, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages A&E and Amazon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Patrick M. Byrne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frontline.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Quick, Spot the Quetzalcoatl!. Thank you for your work on Cover FX. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start. Needs more material of the type covered by independent sources. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 17:33, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfD on Emily Baldoni

Hello Quick, Spot the Quetzalcoatl! -- Two things -- I've removed the BLP violation in your AfD nomination. It may be sourced in the subject's article, but such material should never be copied willy nilly, especially without the sourcing. Second, don't first gut articles that you take to AfD (unless the content is defamatory). Contributors to the AfD don't usually look in the history, and need to be able to quickly assess how notable or otherwise the article's subject is. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 10:07, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]