User talk:Quetterry
Quetterry, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Quetterry! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 16 December 2020 (UTC) |
January 2021
[edit]
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Medininagar, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please stop changing the name used in the article, adding unsourced claims and other major changes that have been reverted. If you believe that they are an improvement then per WP:BRD use the article talk page to seek consensus rather than than trying to bulldoze the changes through. noq (talk) 12:50, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Chianki Airstrip has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
non notable airstrip.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 10:54, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
How to edit effectively
[edit]If you want your edits to remain you need to learn how to make contributions that enhance an article rather than degrade it.
- Make smaller changes and include references where appropriate.
- Leave a relevant edit summary that explains what you are trying to do.
- Do not make large changes across multiple sections in one edit. More is likely to survive if the good stuff can be separated from the dross.
noq (talk) 17:59, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of History of Bokaro
[edit]Hello Quetterry,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged History of Bokaro for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 19:13, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Recent edit reversion
[edit]In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.
I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.
I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick(Talk) 19:20, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Mavalli, Bangalore moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Mavalli, Bangalore, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jmertel23 (talk) 01:14, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Films set in Daltonganj (Medininagar)
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Category:Films set in Daltonganj (Medininagar) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:00, 25 March 2021 (UTC)