User talk:Queens395
Queens395, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Queens395! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 14 June 2020 (UTC) |
Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hopeful2014, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Lord Belbury (talk) 10:12, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Hiya,Can you please get rid of the block as I have done nothing wrong. It was a mistake as I dont have good connection and while I was trying to make the Queens350 account, and when it was signing up the account, I thought it was taking slow soI closed the tab down and went and signed up again as Queens395 account as I had not known that the Queens350 account. It was innocent mistake and therefore I think the block should be removed.
Thanks for your understanding. Queens395 (talk) 15:37, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Sorry for the mistakes in the reply. I had not known I had created the Queens350 account and that was the reason why I signed up again as Queens395 as I thought my internet connection was not working. Please read thoroughly. Queens395 (talk) 15:40, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Queens395 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
reason= Mistaken IdentityQueens395 (talk) 10:59, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural close. As no admin has taken you up on this in more than two weeks, I am declining this. Feel free to make another request, but make sure that it follows the guide to appealing blocks and is substantially different from your past requests. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 22:17, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hi, I am confused as you think I am a sockpuppet of Hopeful2014 and I am not. The reason why I was editing the E postcode area was because I saw some of the information for example, Woodford Green in the E postcode area table have the E4 postcode but on the Woodford green page, the only postcode for that district was IG8 and so that's why I started to edit the E postcode area as some areas had incorrect or missing postcodes. Well, I did give an edit summary on some pages but still can you unblock me as I am not Hopeful2014 because this is mistaken identity.I am not here to vandalize, I am here to help, correct and add information when needed.
I think you must know that I am not Hopeful2014 because that user last logged on the Wikipedia on 20 May 2020 as I joined on 14 June 2020 so you may think this Hopeful2014 has created this account. I would like to continue editing. Anyway I caught out a mistake from Lord Belbury suspicions as they say Stepney was edited changed from E1,E14 to just E1 but the mistake there is that occurred at 14:10, 14 June 2020 and as in my log I was not editing between 1130 and 1432 so that means I could not have changed the Stepney postcode and even I did without logging in, I would not do that anyway because of privacy and security as it shows the IP address. I edited Camden Town at 1432 so Lord Belbury that Stepney evidence you are putting against me is not evidence. However, I am not Hopeful2014 nor am I abusing accounts.
Thank you
Queens395—Preceding undated comment added 09:32, 17 June 2020
- Hello. You'll need to use an {{unblock}} template here, to formally appeal against a block if you feel it was made in error. See Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks for instructions. --Lord Belbury ([[User talk:Lord Belbury|
- Queens395, are you a friend of Hopeful214? Did Hopeful214 ask you to edit Wikipedia? I'm trying to understand what happened here. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:41, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
No I am not a friend of Hopeful2014. I dont even know this user and I would not be friends an abuser of accounts and sockpuppet. What happened is that Lord Belbury and RoySmith (RoySmith is the administrator that blocked me) spotted and thought I was changing the postcodes in the E Postcode area when I was actually correcting and adding postcodes that we're missing. However, the reason why Lord Belbury thought I was a sockpuppet of Hopeful2014 because this user was known to create sockpuppets and vandalize the postcode. Also, another reason they thought I was a sockpuppet of Hopeful2014 was because I was "apparently" doing the exact same things this user and their sockpuppets would do, which puts me off there because I am correcting information. 3. The last reason they thought I was a sockpuppet is that because I don't have good internet connection, I was waiting to create the account, Queens350, but when I thought it was taking too long to create the account. I closed the tab down and did it again, putting myself as Queens395 not knowing I had already created the Queens350 account and by the time I realised, that is when they started doing their investigation. This should help you investigate the problem now. Also, I have read the "Don't be too quick to assume that sowene is a sockpuppet", I think that the administrator who blocked me thought I was a sockpuppet as I've viewed the wiki for 2 years now but only made an account in this week, so probably thought it was a new account so it must be a sockpuppet.