User talk:Quapet

Welcome!

Hello, Quapet, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Michael Domitrz, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 17:03, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Michael Domitrz

A tag has been placed on Michael Domitrz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 17:03, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Date Safe Project

A tag has been placed on The Date Safe Project requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Passportguy (talk) 17:06, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Michael Domitrz

I was in the process of adding more significant content and references to this article before it was deleted, can you give any advice so it is not deleted again? This time I started the article under my user so I can refine it before moving it to a article--Quapet (talk) 21:33, 2 June 2009 (UTC) With my second attempt at this article, I am being neutral and adding important and significant content along with references.--Quapet (talk) 00:59, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You can't create an article on the project you're trying to, nor on the person - because you're linked to the subject in question. Your username is Quapet, which is also used by the Head of PR at the organisation. This is adequate proof that you've got a conflict of interest, and thus, according to our rules at WP:COI, you shouldn't be making an article on them. I hope you understand the reasons for this - we hope you decide to stay and help with other articles, though! Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 16:33, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]