User talk:Qdcraw
Welcome to Wikipedia
[edit]Welcome!
Hello, Qdcraw, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! --4wajzkd02 (talk) 15:05, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Warnings
[edit]Older warnings may have been removed, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | page moves | block log | block list]
November 2009
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added such as to the page Slavery do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 20:12, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Slavery. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 20:20, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Slavery, you will be blocked from editing. NeilN talk ♦ contribs 07:20, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Human rights. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The edit(s) are as follows: [1],[2] --4wajzkd02 (talk) 15:25, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to Monosodium glutamate, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. The edit(s) are as follows: [3] --4wajzkd02 (talk) 15:28, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you use Wikipedia for advertising, as you did with Cowrie-shell divination, you will be blocked from editing. It would appear that virtually all your edits serve as advertisements for a book authored by yourself. Favonian (talk) 12:01, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to Third World, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing their websites from appearing on Wikipedia. The edit(s) are as follows: [4] --4wajzkd02 (talk) 15:30, 16 November 2009 (UTC)\
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Talk:The Holocaust, you will be blocked from editing. The edit(s) are as follows: [5] --4wajzkd02 (talk) 15:05, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
- Also: Developing country [6] [7], Holocaust and Genocide Studies [8], The holocaust [9], Ancient money [10], Religious belief [11], Fluoride poisoning [12] --4wajzkd02 (talk) 15:39, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. You've copy/pasted large amounts of copyrighted text into a number articles, including: Slavery[13], Universal Declaration of Human Rights [14] [15], Cowrie-shell divination [16],Ancient money [17], Talk:The Holocaust [18], Religious belief [19],Fluoride poisoning [20], Fluoride poisoning [21] --4wajzkd02 (talk) 15:08, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article [[You are adding to articles using your books, and changing articles to match the point of view of these books. There are a number of articles (mentioned in earlier warnings) for which this apparent conflict of interest applies, including: Ancient money, Cowrie-shell divination and others. Please read WP:COI and stop disrupting Wikipedia. ]], you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. [22] --4wajzkd02 (talk) 15:42, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. TNXMan 15:59, 16 November 2009 (UTC)