User talk:Qais16

Royal infoboxes

Please do not replace maiden names with married names in the infobox. Use the maiden name. Per WP:NOPIPE, please do not add unnecessary pipes. Thanks. DrKiernan (talk) 18:02, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Please do not make up titles or add nonsense to wikipedia. Charlotte was never dowager grand duchess. A dowager is the widow of a grand duke not an abdicated grand duchess in her own right. The material you're trying to add is obviously wrong. DrKiernan (talk) 15:41, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Ghislaine Dommanget shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. DrKiernan (talk) 19:38, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

All royals/imperials' titles should be listed which I have been listing, why should it be deleted and if you think it should be deleted shouldn't we delete all the titles of Queen Elizabeth II. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qais16 (talk • contribs)

You are still adding obviously incorrect information, at Prince Felix of Bourbon-Parma, for example. And it is also obvious that you are a sockpuppet of Qais13 (talk · contribs), previously blocked for adding hoaxes or false information to wikipedia. If you do not start editing sensibly, then you will be blocked as a disruptive, edit-warring sock puppet. DrKiernan (talk) 19:46, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  DrKiernan (talk) 08:34, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Qais16 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I've only added information and have also sourced the correct information, such as: The current title of Queen Anne of Romania where the whole of her title is on the page of the Romanian Royal Family Qais16 (talk) 12:31, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You were blocked indefinitely under a previous account called Qais13. In this context, I'm declining your request to be unblocked. PhilKnight (talk) 13:48, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.