User talk:QRx Belladonna

This is QRx Belladonna's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kaival Brands (March 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gpkp was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kaival Brands and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kaival Brands, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gpkp [u • t • c] 06:09, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, QRx Belladonna! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gpkp [u • t • c] 06:09, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Niraj Patel (March 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Gpkp were:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Niraj Patel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Niraj Patel, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gpkp [u • t • c] 06:15, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Bidi Vapor

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Bidi Vapor, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Gpkp [u • t • c] 06:21, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Modussiccandi (talk) 08:43, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have repeatedly moved promotional pages from draft to the article space without waiting for them to be checked by a reviewer. You will need to stop trying to promote these companies if you want to stick around for the long run. Modussiccandi (talk) 08:47, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. This is noted. QRx Belladonna (talk) 08:50, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! We are trying to make it sound less promotional. Should I wait a few days before I edit again? QRx Belladonna (talk) 08:48, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You should refrain from making unsourced, wholly-positive edits. Wikipedia hosts neutral, encyclopaedic, and well-sourced material. None of your articles had any real sources, which is a huge red flag. What you'll need to do is to gather material that high-quality media outlets have written about these entities. If these sources do not exist, an article on the topic may not be created. Whatever you do, you need to respect the verdict of the draft reviewers. So, if they decline your submission, you should not promote your draft by yourself. You may continue to edit, but be aware that your creations will be deleted if they continue to be promotional and you may be blocked from editing. Also, you seem to have a conflict of interest with these companies you're trying to write on. If this is the case, please publicly disclose this on your userpage. Modussiccandi (talk) 08:56, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information. We will gather what we need to do and edit a non-biased article in the future and refrain from moving them. Have a good day! QRx Belladonna (talk) 08:58, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]