User talk:QLDer in NSW

Welcome!

Hello, QLDer in NSW! Welcome to Wikipedia! You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! SkyWarrior 01:10, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Disambiguation link notification for August 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Results of the 2020 Victorian local elections, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Walsh. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 Saarland state election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Plurality.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Mark Speakman

added a link pointing to Quota

Selena Uibo

added a link pointing to Anindilyakwa

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

something happened

https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wheatbelt_(Western_Australia)&action=history

any thoughts? JarrahTree 09:20, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure. The map was actually like that before I created the template. QLDer in NSW (talk) 06:14, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think I've fixed it, there was an en dash in the name so the link to the map data was broken. --Canley (talk) 04:26, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that JarrahTree 06:29, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wheatbelt Region InteractiveMap

{{Wheatbelt Region InteractiveMap}} appears not to show any area marked. Mitch Ames (talk) 09:35, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See above. QLDer in NSW (talk) 06:15, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mark Speakman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Quota.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Map templates of regions of Western Australia nominated for deletion

Hi QLDer, I've nominated templates and categories you created a week ago at WP:TFD for being used on only singular pages each. You can comment in the discussion here. SWinxy (talk) 17:43, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Referendum results with change

Template:Referendum results with change has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:31, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 16

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Al Jazeera controversies and criticism

added a link pointing to Port Arthur massacre

Blackbuck

added a link pointing to Cape York

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Arbcom

Have you considered WP:RFPP? If your problematic interlocutors are typically unregistered editors, page protection may be a relatively simple solution. I haven't looked deeply into the issue (and am ignorant of Australian politics), but I predict your case request will be declined as premature. Best of luck, Folly Mox (talk) 04:35, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think ArbCom may be the best option. QLDer in NSW (talk) 04:37, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration case request

Hello QLDer in NSW. I'm a member of the Arbitration Committee. I wanted to reach out because I'm closing your arbitration case request, as arbitration is not required at this stage. Arbitration on Wikipedia is a lengthy, complicated process that involves the unilateral adjudication of a dispute by an elected committee. Although the Committee's decisions can be useful to certain disputes, in many cases the actual process of arbitration is unenjoyable and time-consuming. Moreover, for most disputes the community maintains an effective set of mechanisms for reaching a compromise or resolving a grievance.

In your case, your request appears to belong first at WP:RFPP, and if you have requests that go beyond the scope of that venue, then perhaps at WP:AN or WP:ANI. An arbitration case is an unpleasant process and unsuited to this issue. A case generally takes several months and hundreds of person-hours from parties and arbitrators and focuses on issues that the community is incapable of resolving. Please see {{Arb premature}} for more information from our standard message in these cases.

Best, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 04:53, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. Sorry if my request wasted any time. QLDer in NSW (talk) 07:23, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indigenous Voice to Parliament

Hi QLDer in NSW. Thanks for your work on linking the 2023 Australian Indigenous Voice referendum to the 2023 New Zealand general election. You might be interested in a Guardian article about NZ evangelist and anti co-governance activist Julian Batchelor's arguments being co-opted by opponents of the Indigenous Voice in Australia. Hope this helps. Andykatib 04:41, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Al Jazeera controversies and criticism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Port Arthur massacre.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation moves

Hi there, I see that you moved Matt Flynn (Australian footballer) to Matt Flynn (Australian rules footballer). One of the guidelines for disambiguation is that it should be as concise as it needs to be to be unambiguous. Generally for Aussie rules players, we use (footballer), unless there is another footballer, then (Australian footballer) unless there is another Australian footballer (of any code, even rugby). In this case (Australian footballer) was appropriate. Many sports have their own guidelines or commonly used terms, which may not be documented, but I find browsing the relevant categories will show you what most other disambiguated pages are named. I won't move it back, but please don't move any more unless there is true ambiguity with the current name. The-Pope (talk) 14:12, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2023 AFL Grand Final

Hi, apologies I do not mean to be rude but so you know, Wikipedia is not a live-scores app. I know this because there have been cases where live scores have been reverted with explanations saying "we are an encyclopedia, not a live scores app". For the moment, I have removed the second quarter progressive scores, but feel free to update them at the end of each quarter. Thanks, Avatar5991 (talk) 05:42, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. It was a great game but I'm disappointed that Brisbane lost. :( QLDer in NSW (talk) 21:54, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe MrFlyingPies23 (talk) 20:48, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andrew Tate, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Big Pharma and Radical right.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, QLDer in NSW. Thank you for your work on Postcode gang. User:Vanamonde93, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi QLDer, when you create a redirect such as Postcode gang, we generally encourage you to edit the target article (in this case, Gangs in Australia) to make sure it explains the term being redirected. In this case, it isn't clear why the redirect you created needs to exist, and we may need to delete it. Please see WP:R#DELETE #10.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Vanamonde93}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vanamonde (Talk) 17:46, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kealey Adamson moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kealey Adamson. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (talk) 16:09, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Results of the 2023 Australian Indigenous Voice referendum

A tag has been placed on Results of the 2023 Australian Indigenous Voice referendum requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

page is blank and doesn't contain any results, (to be replaced with Draft:Results of the 2023 Australian Indigenous Voice referendum

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ––– GMH MELBOURNE 13:35, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for 2023 Australian Indigenous Voice referendum

On 14 October 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2023 Australian Indigenous Voice referendum, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 22:01, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Results of the 2023 Australian Indigenous Voice referendum moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Results of the 2023 Australian Voice referendum. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because Lack of content. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ––– GMH MELBOURNE 23:54, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for 2023 New Zealand general election

On 15 October 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2023 New Zealand general election, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 00:20, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

You have recently made edits related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them. This is a standard message to inform you that gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. ––FormalDude (talk) 22:57, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What gender-related article did I edit? QLDer in NSW (talk) 22:58, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Homosexuality in modern sports and numerous LGBT categories. ––FormalDude (talk) 23:03, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Homosexuality does not relate to gender but okay. QLDer in NSW (talk) 00:01, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article is not exclusively about homosexuality. It covers gender in several ways. ––FormalDude (talk) 00:37, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for letting me know. QLDer in NSW (talk) 00:38, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Opinion polling for the 2018 Victorian state election

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Opinion polling for the 2018 Victorian state election requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://academy.financialafrik.com/the-red/victoria-state-election-results. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick (Talk) 20:57, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The text was copied from 2018 Victorian state election#Polling. QLDer in NSW (talk) 20:58, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion polling for the 2011 New South Wales state election moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Opinion polling for the 2011 New South Wales state election. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Seawolf35 (talk - email) 21:39, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion polling for the 2012 Queensland state election moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Opinion polling for the 2012 Queensland state election. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 22:40, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Attribution

I noticed you split a lot of polling sections into their own articles (e.g. Opinion polling for the 2010 Victorian state election was split from 2010 Victorian state election). However, you need to provide attribution in your edit summary when doing so. I suggest reading Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia which has details on this. Please let me know if you have any questions! Elli (talk | contribs) 03:03, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Australian Defence League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nativism.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! MrFlyingPies23 (talk) 20:47, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

73.27.191.165's reverts

Hi QLDer in NSW, you seem to have made many edits like Special:Diff/1173462906, without a summary (thanks, MrFlyingPies23) and at least one time overwriting an HTML comment expressing at very least one editor's opposition to this (Special:Diff/1173467553). Please do not continue without pointing to a consensus for performing these mass changes in your edit summary. I'd inform you about WP:CT/AP, but you have been informed earlier this year by FormalDude who might want to have a look. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:00, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah you need to provide an edit summary when you edit on Wikipedia articles. 👍WP:FIES Thanks. MrFlyingPies23 ✉(✍) 03:35, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

position of Labor Left

Hi, I noticed that you'd edited the infobox of Labor Left to indicate that they were centre-left to left-wing. That's previously been removed by others (not me). I'd suggest it might be a good idea to find a citation to add to that claim or someone is going to come along and move it again. If you can find an academic source that would be the best sort. TarnishedPath^talk 13:29, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Australian soccer icon

Template:Australian soccer icon has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:46, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Te Reo Ahitereiria per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Te Reo Ahitereiria. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Spicy (talk) 11:07, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Opinion polling for the 2012 Queensland state election

Hello, QLDer in NSW. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Opinion polling for the 2012 Queensland state election, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:05, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Opinion polling for the 2012 Queensland state election

Hello, QLDer in NSW. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Opinion polling for the 2012 Queensland state election".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:43, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Opinion polling in Australia by state or territory

A tag has been placed on Category:Opinion polling in Australia by state or territory indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:04, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]