User talk:QJX
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/05/F-86F.jpg/220px-F-86F.jpg)
Hello, QJX! F86Sabre would like to welcome you to Wikipedia! I hope you stay to build our encyclopedia! You might like the following pages:
- Civility
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
- Vandalism
And before you start editing articles, please test here. I hope you enjoy your stay! Please sign your posts on talk pages with ~~~~. If you have a question, please leave a note on my talk page, put {{helpme}} on this page, or go to the help desk. Happy editing!
F86Sabre 23:01, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Please, go take a look at WP:Reliable sources. You'll understand why a claim set forth in a court pleading is not sufficient to permit the assertion to be included in Wikipedia as a fact. What you're looking for is a third party source, of the kind deemed generally "reliable" under the foregoing, that reports the 90% figure. Neither the pleading nor attestations by anonymous editors who claim to have been there are sufficient to that end. As I explained on the Talk page, the edit is improper for at least two reasons. Whether it's me or someone else, the edit will keep being reverted until you can resolve these two issues (phrasing and sourcing, the latter being the more important). Thanks. JohnInDC (talk) 02:57, 14 April 2010 (UTC)