User talk:Pyar Ke Sadqay

Pyar Ke Sadqay, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Pyar Ke Sadqay! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:13, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Good article

Hello! Please don't add the Good article template to articles that haven't gone through the Good Article Nomination process, as you did at Sanam Jung. Thank you! -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 13:07, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Meray Paas Tum Ho. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Diff: [1] We're not interested in editors' personal opinions or evaluations. Any opinion must be directly attributed to a reliable published source. Your commentary also seems to ignore that the world is a big place, and it's unlikely that this was the most popular show in the entire world. Lastly, in articles about Indian subjects, we use British spelling. Neighbour is correct, neighbor is not. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:14, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

Hi, the promotional tone of your editing suggests the possibility that you are a paid editor. Can you confirm if that is the case as although paid editing is allowed it must be declared as per WP:PAID, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 17:30, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sanam Jung, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diff: [2] You may not add unsourced biographical details, like a subject's birthdate, which could violate their privacy or subject them to identity theft, unless that content is sourced in known, mainstream sources. No blogs, no content aggregators or "portals" or any other faceless website. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:11, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Patiparmeshwar (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:02, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]