User talk:Pwhytcross
Welcome
[edit]
|
Thanks!
[edit]Hi, Pwhytcross! Thanks for all the Australian updates to the many Duran Duran articles -- I've done a lot of work on the Duran stuff here but never had a good source for Australian charts going back that far. I was hoping someone in the know would come along! Where did you get all this great info?
I hope you might also be able to add some of the chart rankings to the Duran Duran discography page, or at least the "discussion" tab for that page if you're not used to working with tables yet.
Thanks again for your contributions! — Catherine\talk 06:47, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Image:Melbduststorm1983.jpg missing description details
[edit]Unspecified source for Image:Dustsl2.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Dustsl2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:50, 17 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 19:50, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Image source problem with Image:Ashwednesday1.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Ashwednesday1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:43, 22 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Longhair\talk 09:43, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Image source problem with Image:Melbduststorm.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Melbduststorm.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:46, 22 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Longhair\talk 09:46, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Bwf2.gif
[edit]Thank you for uploading Image:Bwf2.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Nilfanion (talk) 01:48, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Please not that flag icons are not to be used as decorationa dn should not be placed inside the charts tables on song or album articles per WP:FLAG. I've noticed that you have added them to a number of song articles and these will all have to be removed. - eo (talk) 13:10, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Hey, please also check out WP:SONGS. You've changed a lot of things which just aren't right (such as the order of the sections, moving track lists all the way to the bottom). Also, please think about rewording the intros (I'm looking specifically now at some of the Erasure songs you redid). A song is a song first and foremost, and whether it was a single is secondary. You should keep the opening lines as they were. Please check out these guidelines and leave me a message if you have any questions. - eo (talk) 13:15, 26 April 2008 (UTC)- Meh, scratch that, I shouldn't leave messages so early in the morning. I thought you had shuffled around the order of sections but I see you mainly just added the flag thingies. They still need to go, tho :-) - eo (talk) 13:28, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
File:Ashwednesday1.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ashwednesday1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 17:50, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)