User talk:Pushan a

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gauri Ayyub.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:36, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Error: There was no comment detected! Please follow the instructions at Template:AfC comment. While this woman certainly meets WP:Notability, you aren't quite addressing the footnoting issue. Footnotes are not for, say, "Mr Smith wrote a book called The West Lake [footnote: The West Lake, Smith, 1932]". Not at all, instead a list of someone's books go in a "Works" section or similar. What a footnote is for, for example, is "Mr Smith wrote The West Lake while recuperating from a bout of malaria caught while working in Belize, and his fever visions gave the basis for the book's surreal scenes.[footnote: Smith's Middle Year Works and the Dadaist Movement, Professor N. Johnson, 1948].

The footnote isn't just to testify that a book exists (that can be self-evident). What we need footnotes for is to verify that statements made about her life and impact are correct and have been documented in academia or media. Please check out GoogleBooks, and check out news websites for any articles about her, and use those to continue to verify and footnote facts about her work and its significance. MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:37, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Pushan a, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Your submission at Articles for creation

Gauri Ayyub, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Arctic Kangaroo (✉ • ✎) 13:42, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abu Sayeed Ayyub (January 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kieran207 was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more sourcing, The Early life and Personal life sections need sourcing from Reliable sources. Everything else seems acceptable, just fix what I mentioned and we should be good.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abu Sayeed Ayyub and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Abu Sayeed Ayyub, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kieran207 talk 22:01, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abu Sayeed Ayyub has been accepted

Abu Sayeed Ayyub, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Kieran207 talk 14:30, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]