User talk:Purplewowies/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Purplewowies. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
April 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Signing Time! Foundation has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Alexfusco5 01:43, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- It really needs to be a subsection of the main article -- the foundation itself isn't notable apart from Signing Time!. NawlinWiki (talk) 02:45, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Something you might care to note
Regarding this edit that you made to Cody Martin, the IP you reverted is a persistent vandal, creating gratuitous wikilinks and changing content. You'll often see it changing female names to "Chanel". Unfortunately it has a dynamic address so the IP changes, but it's always from 108.17.x.x --AussieLegend (talk) 02:43, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
Uriel227 at Dylan and Cole Sprouse
Uriel227 has been reported to WP:3RRN for breaching 3RR. The discussion is here. --AussieLegend (talk) 10:58, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
You might also like to check out the SPI case that I've just started. --AussieLegend (talk) 12:41, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
Thnak you
Thank you for the cookie.[1] You're not so bad yourself. --AussieLegend (talk) 03:10, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
WikiProject Disney Role Call
Hi, WikiProject Disney has been rather inactive recently. I saw that you are a member of the project. If you still consider yourself to be an active member, leave a response on the Project's talk page. Hopefully we can get the project up and running again. Thanks!--GroovySandwich 23:59, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
Left aligned images after header question
I have seen lots of left aligned images as the first thing in a section in a lot of articles so I am curious where the issue of "Left-aligned images directly after headers can cause problems with screen readers and break the flow of text" is discussed and if there are other workarounds other than a paragraph of text before the image. Looks like a bug in the wiki software. Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:36, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
To add - I checked a bunch of WP:featured articles and, although right aligned images are most common, I found a lot of articles with left aligned images directly after headers so this does not appear to be an issue for featured article promotion. --Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:47, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
- Actually, an admin switched an image I had added to a right alignment and said that was the reason, and I assumed he was right. I have a screen reading browser that I use to check for accessibility issues here sometimes. I checked the page before and after the edit, and it read it confusingly before, so I changed it. However, it also read confusingly after, so I have no idea. I might've been (read: was probably, like I am usually about tech-ish stuff like that) wrong. - Purplewowies (talk) 03:25, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
- I added more stuff about this at Talk:Jessie (TV series)#Left aligned image in Main characters section so others can participate. If it is an issue, I think it is fairly minor. Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:30, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
Re: One of your suggestions in the Peer Review for Dylan and Cole Sprouse
I assume there are reliable sources that refer to them as the Sprouse Brothers, and I know they refer to themselves as the Sprouse Bros, so I assume it would be OK to use and bold both. If for some reason no reliable sources ever refer to them as the Sprouse Brothers (which seems unlikely), then I would not bold it. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 23:44, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Help desk
I just wanted to thank you for the quick response to my question. Chris (talk) 22:01, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- If you ever have trouble (for whatever reason) with getting a page deleted that you and you only have created, you can always go to WP:AN, where you can say essentially "Please delete this page; I'm the only contributor, but for some reason I can't mark it for deletion". Pages for which you're the only editor generally qualify for speedy deletion under criterion G7: "Author requests deletion. If requested in good faith and provided that the only substantial content to the page and to the associated talk page was added by its author." Nyttend (talk) 03:13, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited History of deaf education in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aides (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 17:01, 11 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Nolelover Talk·Contribs 17:01, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Ping again
Just in case you missed it... Nolelover Talk·Contribs 14:18, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyedit
Is there a place where I can request an article to be copyedited? Thanks. - Purplewowies (talk) 20:19, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
You can try Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests and Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/List of participants--NeoBatfreak (talk) 20:22, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
I saw an IP blanking a User's page and reverted it. Seems to be a common vandalism. Sorry for the inconvenience! Jim1138 (talk) 19:45, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
TSLOZAC/TSLOD
I appreciate the effort that you've gone to copying the character content into the two articles that you've created, but it's problematic. The main issue is with the main characters, Zack, Cody, London and Mr Moseby, who appeared in both series. The content from their articles shouldn't simply be duplicated at each of the new articles. Only content relevant to the specific series should be in each article. Content that is common to both series needs to be in each article, but that inevitably results in duplication errors and a loss of the character's full history in each article. Then there is the issue of redirection of the original articles. Redirecting them to one or other of the series is inappropriate because it makes it difficult for readers to find the Mr Moseby of TSLOD if his article is redirected to the TSLOZAC article. At some point in the past, somebody created List of characters in The Suite Life (series) and I had considered placing all of the characters in one article, but this results in other issues, namely that there is a group who delight in deleting multiple fair-use images in list articles, improperly citing WP:NFLISTS as justification. This would result in one, nice and neat article without any images of the characters at all. Ultimately it seemed best to leave the individual articles. That said, there is a definite need to prune much of the content in the individual articles, and that should really be done before any merging. --AussieLegend (talk) 08:22, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
- Well... I only even considered merging because it was the second time in a relatively short span that a merge was suggested for most/all of the character articles (first at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Fictional characters/Archive 3#Can this article be reassessed?, second at User talk:Nolelover#A barnstar for you!). I'm an inclusionist at heart and would do anything possible to keep things from being merged/deleted, which was why I did a huge chunk of work on Cody's article until I hit a wall (not that he was in really super danger of being merged or deleted). I really think that these specific articles would be much better separate, especially if their problems can be dealt with. (I was going to say something else here but my brain is almost sleepwalking at this point... Hopefully, you understand what I'm saying.) - Purplewowies (talk) 08:53, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
- Redirects to these characters: as a result of your operations, several redirects were first switched by one bot, as double redirects, to point to List of The Suite Life of Zack & Cody main characters and then, when that was deleted, marked by another bot for speedy deletion as dead redirects. For future reference, when doing these sort of moves and rearrangements, you need to click "what links here" so that you know what redirects may be affected. Now that I see what has been going on, I have re-created Madeline "Maddie" Fitzpatrick and Madeline Fitzpatrick to point to the existing article Maddie Fitzpatrick, and London Leah Tipton to point to London Tipton. There were also Madeline Margaret Genevieve Miranda Catherine Fitzpatrick, Madeline Margaret Genevieve Miranda Catherine "Maddie" Fitzpatrick and Madeline "Maddie" Margaret Genevieve Miranda Catherine Fitzpatrick - restore them if you like, but I did not because they seem to me absurd overkill. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 14:48, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
- I have just intercepted Marion Moseby and Moseby and redirected them to Mr. Moseby before they got deleted. There are no more live redirects still pointing to the "List" article, but others may have been deleted by people who didn't realise what was going on. JohnCD (talk) 14:59, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah... I normally check those types of things. Disregarding the fact that a merge like that probably needed more consensus, I made the mistake of starting it pretty late in the day. It took a long time to do, and it was mentally tiring, so by the end of the initial merging, I was already a little out of it and had started succumbing to brain fog. I had completely forgotten to check redirects at that point, even with the merge instructions in front of me telling me to do so. Then, when the character redirects I had done as part of the merge were reverted back into being character articles, I thought it would be best for the list articles to be deleted (though I probably could have waited to do something like that when my thoughts were more coherent). Again, partially because I was extremely tired, I totally forgot to check redirects at a time when I normally would have. I am never doing something like this again. I'm sorry. - Purplewowies (talk) 17:36, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
- No worries but, as I said above, other incoming redirects from individual character names may have been deleted by people who did not realise what was going on, so you might like to check any other alternate versions of names that might have been redirects. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 17:45, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
- The only other one I could think of was Carey Marie Martin, which I have restored. I can't think of any other names (other than the ones you've mentioned) that are even close to significant enough that someone would've/should've made a redirect. (And in the case of Maddie, if someone were to search her entire name, 66-100% of the results are related to The Suite Life.) - Purplewowies (talk) 18:01, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
- No worries but, as I said above, other incoming redirects from individual character names may have been deleted by people who did not realise what was going on, so you might like to check any other alternate versions of names that might have been redirects. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 17:45, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah... I normally check those types of things. Disregarding the fact that a merge like that probably needed more consensus, I made the mistake of starting it pretty late in the day. It took a long time to do, and it was mentally tiring, so by the end of the initial merging, I was already a little out of it and had started succumbing to brain fog. I had completely forgotten to check redirects at that point, even with the merge instructions in front of me telling me to do so. Then, when the character redirects I had done as part of the merge were reverted back into being character articles, I thought it would be best for the list articles to be deleted (though I probably could have waited to do something like that when my thoughts were more coherent). Again, partially because I was extremely tired, I totally forgot to check redirects at a time when I normally would have. I am never doing something like this again. I'm sorry. - Purplewowies (talk) 17:36, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
- I have just intercepted Marion Moseby and Moseby and redirected them to Mr. Moseby before they got deleted. There are no more live redirects still pointing to the "List" article, but others may have been deleted by people who didn't realise what was going on. JohnCD (talk) 14:59, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
- Redirects to these characters: as a result of your operations, several redirects were first switched by one bot, as double redirects, to point to List of The Suite Life of Zack & Cody main characters and then, when that was deleted, marked by another bot for speedy deletion as dead redirects. For future reference, when doing these sort of moves and rearrangements, you need to click "what links here" so that you know what redirects may be affected. Now that I see what has been going on, I have re-created Madeline "Maddie" Fitzpatrick and Madeline Fitzpatrick to point to the existing article Maddie Fitzpatrick, and London Leah Tipton to point to London Tipton. There were also Madeline Margaret Genevieve Miranda Catherine Fitzpatrick, Madeline Margaret Genevieve Miranda Catherine "Maddie" Fitzpatrick and Madeline "Maddie" Margaret Genevieve Miranda Catherine Fitzpatrick - restore them if you like, but I did not because they seem to me absurd overkill. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 14:48, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
A cookie for you!
|
Thanks for welcoming me with cookies! Here, have one!! NarratedSignedThis (talk) 17:47, 6 February 2012 (UTC) |
Thank You
This is just to thank you for your kind help with my proposal to delete an article. Thank you! RomanSpa (talk) 23:23, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Permission Help!!
How do I get permission to edit Semi-Locked pages?
NarratedSignedThis (talk) 00:42, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- You need to be confirmed or autoconfirmed. You will become autoconfirmed on 10 Febrary 2012 at 00:36 UTC (about two more days). To be confirmed, you have to request it, which I see you did a couple of days ago. Your request was denied, and they said you should probably get more experience here, so they would probably deny it if you asked again. Your two best options are to either wait until you're autoconfirmed two days from now and make the edit yourself, or request an edit on the article's talk page following the instructions here. - Purplewowies (talk) 02:11, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the help. I'll just wait to be auto confirmed. NarratedSignedThis (talk) 23:53, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
You are not a bot!
And therefore you get to make judgements like these! :) You don't need to increment the warnings by one each time, and the only reason bots and automated scripts do it is because they don't have human judgement, and so can't decide which warning is most appropriate. For obvious bad-faith vandalism, it's quite acceptable to start at level two or three, or to skip a few levels, as long as they get a final warning before they're reported to WP:AIV. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:12, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
- I know. :-p I just typically don't skip warning levels myself, and I felt the need to explain my reasoning in the edit summary. On another note, I apparently behave like a bot a lot, since some other sites that have anti-bot technology stop me sometimes for bot-like browsing activity. :) - Purplewowies (talk) 18:25, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
- Fair enough. How on Earth can you browse like a bot? If ClueBot could read, I'd be able to write an article instead of block vandals! ;) HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:33, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
- I don't know. :-? I think I was repeatedly searching the site, and it told me I was searching too much like a bot does or something. I believe I was quickly searching for things on the site, clicking into a page, realizing it wasn't what I needed, then searching a similar term and doing the process again. I was attempting to cite a statement here, and I was "in the zone" and searching really quickly and repetitively, so maybe that set it off? (Come to think of it, I think the message I got told me very specifically what I was doing and then apologized in case I was a human, but I don't quite remember because it was awhile ago. :P Also, I know nothing about bots.) - Purplewowies (talk) 20:00, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
- Fair enough. How on Earth can you browse like a bot? If ClueBot could read, I'd be able to write an article instead of block vandals! ;) HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:33, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
Request for comment: Template:more plot
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 February 21#Template:More plot is closed as keep. However, these issues are still discussed in Template talk:More plot. Please join in discussion for more consensus. --George Ho (talk) 01:47, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 12:11, 14 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
-- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 12:11, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
PS: If you reply to me at the help desk, please drop me a reminder onto my talkpage, as otherwise I might forget to check back for your reply there. Thanks. -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 13:03, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Message added 13:04, 15 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
(Scsbot archived the help desk section while I was replying to it.) -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 13:04, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Section revived at WP:HD#Attention parameter?. -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 13:30, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
If I needed to include a path?
Template talk:Cite web#If I needed to include a path? has been moved to Help talk:Citation Style 1#If I needed to include a path?. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 12:31, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
For User:Bulgariatrip1
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Leave downside as is
MI5 are scared of that is why whenever I enter the UK they question me.
Do not touch the downside page. That is good advice. As is the page gives a very good reflection of the values and the history. Do more then I will mention your name in areas where your name should not be mentioned.
I assume you do not have children, but you probably have parents and maybe a girlfriend.
The abuse story is ok to wiki but should have its place a little lower down and without so many words.
If you want a fight you will lose. I can only hope you wish not to go down this route. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Denhaagandy (talk • contribs) 01:23, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Downside
Than you for your message. I will continue to hold that the fact that one has to pay for a product makes it difficult to check sources. Wikipedia is free. The sources ought to be free also. I suspect the comments about Downside have been lifted and are subject to copyright. The contributor also stated that the source is reliable. Wikipedia states that newspapers are not reliable sources. The Times is part of News International which is subject to criminal investigations both in the UK and the USA. To check the source one has to pay for the subscription. I asked the contributor to use a different source. This is fairly easy to do. You can get the same story from the Guardian or even the Telegraph. I also pointed out to him that the school is, according to the UK government, fully compliant with regards to children's safety. He has refused to acknowledge this even though the source according to wiki rules is much better than a newspaper.
I asked also that his piece should be shortened and it's place belongs towards the end of the wiki entry. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia not a place of accusation or innuendo. That spirit has been lost in this case. As is the entry is by far the largest about the community, and actually shows considerable ignorance about the importance of the community. The monks do not go onto the Internet and so are an easy target and defenceless.
I hope this explains in some part my position. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Denhaagandy (talk • contribs) 04:59, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
ANI report filed for User:Denhaagandy
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Yunshui 雲水 12:18, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Message
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Please fill out our brief Teahouse survey
Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at WP:Teahouse would like your feedback!
We have created a brief survey intended to help us understand the experiences and impressions of veteran editors who have participated on the Teahouse. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests pages some time during the last few months.
Click here to be taken to the survey site.
The survey should take less than 15 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!
Happy editing,
J-Mo, Teahouse host
This message was sent via Global message delivery on 01:16, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
Autoblock unblock request
- Purplewowies (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- 198.228.201.154 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
My account appears to be blocked due to the IP I'm using (I figured this out while attempting to make an edit to an article). The IP was blocked after CheckUser determined that the IP was being used disruptively. Can I be unblocked? Also, since my account is in good standing, can I request IP block exemption? (I've never done this before, and I don't know if it's an appropriate thing to ask in this case, but I figured it couldn't hurt to ask.) - Purplewowies (talk) (How's my driving?) 18:43, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
Accept reason: The checkuser who originally imposed the block has determined it's no longer necessary. It was never intended to affect you and you've done nothing wrong, sorry for the trouble! Since the block is lifted, you would no longer need ipblock-exempt, but if this becomes a recurrent issue we could look into setting it for you. Seraphimblade Talk to me 01:05, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
EditorReviewArchiver: Automatic processing of your editor review
This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 2 June 2012 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding <!--noautoarchive--> to the review page will prevent further automated actions. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:39, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
Thank You Very Much for the Cookie!
Futurist110 has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!
Futurist110 (talk) 20:58, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
Dylan and Cole Sprouse
Here they are:
- Centro Chirurgico Toscano - "Pur mantenendo le caratteristiche di Ospedale privato ad indirizzo esclusivamente chirurgico, nel 1995 la conosciutissima Clinica Tanganelli (così chiamata ad Arezzo), cambiò gestione."
- Casa di Cura "Poggio del Sole" - "La Casa di Cura "Poggio del Sole" fu costruita nel 1924 grazie all'impegno del Dr. Federico Tanganelli, con indirizzo squisitamente oculistico, in quanto l'ospedale di Arezzo era privo di tale reparto"
Are these good enough? :) - kingston28 11:22, 24 August 2012 (CEST)
.
I created the page BEFORE the 'Wikihelpdesk' gave their advice. --RouteLeader (talk) 23:16, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Your free 1-year Questia online library account is approved ready
Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email!
- Go to https://www.questia.com/specialoffer
- Input your unique Offer ID and Promotional code. Click Continue. (Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive).
- Create your account by entering the requested information. (This is private and no one from Wikipedia will see it).
- You'll then see the welcome page with your Login ID. (The account is now active for 1 year).
If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com and, second, email QuestiaHelp@cengage.com along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Wikipedia).
- A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Questia article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Questia pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Questia/Citations.
- Questia would love to hear feedback at WP:Questia/Experiences
- Show off your Questia access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/Questia_userbox}} on your userpage
- When the 1-year period is up, check the applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi EdwardsBot (talk) 05:11, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
I support your revert of the content that does not really belong in this article. You should have left a note in the edit summary, though, as uncommented reverts are pretty much synonymous with a vandalism revert and the edit did appear good faith. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:16, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah. I left a comment (and typically leave comments), but my wifi did a weird thing, and Wikipedia was having problems at the time, so I had to do it again and I didn't leave a summary. What's weird is usually it warns me about that... - Purplewowies (talk) 18:23, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
- Actually, I just went to the tab I did the edit in, and a big Wikimedia Error screen greets me. - Purplewowies (talk) 18:27, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
- I hate that when stuff like that happens. I've had problems like that too when wiki is acting up. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:32, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
- Actually, I just went to the tab I did the edit in, and a big Wikimedia Error screen greets me. - Purplewowies (talk) 18:27, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Sprouse brothers
I saw your conversation at the help desk. Take a look at http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Dylan+and+Cole+Sprouse . I don't think you will find any admin that thinks unprotecting an article that has needed to be protected so many times is a good idea. Most of the Disney/Nickeleodeon stars' articles are under near constant semiprotection due to vandalism.—Kww(talk) 08:36, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Hand-coding
Hey all :).
I'm dropping you a note because you've been involved in dealing with feedback from the Article Feedback Tool. To get a better handle on the overall quality of comments now that the tool has become a more established part of the reader experience, we're undertaking a round of hand coding - basically, taking a sample of feedback and marking each piece as inappropriate, helpful, so on - and would like anyone interested in improving the tool to participate :).
You can code as many or as few pieces of feedback as you want: this page should explain how to use the system, and there is a demo here. Once you're comfortable with the task, just drop me an email at okeyes
wikimedia.org and I'll set you up with an account :).
If you'd like to chat with us about the research, or want live tutoring on the software, there will be an office hours session on Monday 17 December at 23:00 UTC in #wikimedia-office connect. Hope to see some of you there! Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 23:18, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
Deletion of Wiki projects
Thanks for your reply at Wikipedia:Help_desk#Deletion_of_Wiki_projects. I want to ask you if wiki projects created withour a proposal are eligible for deletion. What do you recommend me to do? TransylvaniaRomania (talk) 22:17, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
Article Feedback deployment
Hey Purplewowies; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 23:03, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Reward for those involved in April's First pranks
 |
Hello Purplewowies, Eduemoni has given you a shining smiling star! You see, these things promote WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the Shining Smiling Star whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or someone putting up with some stick at this time. Enjoy! Eduemoni↑talk↓ 03:04, 2 April 2013 (UTC) |
I like your style, nice meeting you on Wiki as editors,
this is new for me just a month old. difficult how you get attacked trying to comment anywhere, people attack you not because they have issues with what you wrote, but because you are new so you have to fake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nlfestival (talk • contribs) 00:12, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter
Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...
New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian
Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.
New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??
New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges
News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY
Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions
New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration
Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 20:56, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Thank you message!
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
TeamPiper (talk) 09:32, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Re: How do I read an article (of the same content) in Hindi which I have Spotted in English?
Thank You, I am sure that I will contribute funds to your Epic Free Encyclopaedia I gained immense knowledge from your website, Thanks to everyone single person on your staff for their excellent work on bringing up this website.
Thank You Hem Shailabh Sahu — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shailabh sahu1 (talk • contribs) 14:33, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library Survey
As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi t | c 15:21, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Thanks, so I need to create articles in creation before i publish it? Also please advise if I need to review with administrators before I Publish it? Thanks.
Note: Im not an employee of the Company. I wanted to put information of Company based there as its a public limited company and they are into manufacturing of auto components.
I am New
can u help me please (Mr N Ivanov (talk) 06:50, 6 January 2014 (UTC))
Zack Martin (Suite Life)
I've removed the speedy tag that you added to Zack Martin (Suite Life) because it's not the same article that was deleted, so speedy doesn't apply. One of the things that I noted at the original AfDs was that the Zack Martin and Cody Martin articles were different, with "Zack Martin" essentially being unreferenced while "Cody Martin" was referenced. I assume this is why "Cody Martin" wasn't re-nominated when "Zack Martin" and Bailey Pickett were. Zack Martin (Suite Life) is essentially a rewrite of Cody Martin, which seems reasonable given that they're twins with almost identical storylines. My reaction when I first saw the article earlier was the same as yours, I almost speedied it myself, but I think this would have to go to a new AfD. --AussieLegend (✉) 08:05, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- (The following is moved from my talk page to keep the discussion in one place)
- Okay, fair enough. I sat for several minutes myself debating whether it should have been nommed and went ahead with it because it seemed to be identical to what I remembered. (I'm still of the opinion that these articles would all be better with more real-world coverage I unfortunately don't have the time to add, but that's an issue less-related to this particular thing.) But again, I didn't realize the article was not sufficiently identical to the one that had been deleted... so yeah. (I forget my original point of posting here... but ah, well.) - Purplewowies (talk) 20:04, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- I don't disagree with you about the lack of real-world content. I'm of the opinion now that it might be best to merge all of the articles into "List of The Suite Life series main characters" with redirects from "List of the Suite Life of Zack & Cody main characters" and "List of the Suite Life on Deck main characters". That way we can at least keep the content we have without much risk that the existing articles will be deleted. When that happens we lose everything. --AussieLegend (✉) 04:41, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
Where was I uncivil?
You gave me a warning without saying where I'd allegedly done something wrong.
User_talk:88.104.27.18#January_2014 —Preceding undated comment added 16:01, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Justin Bieber RfC: second survey
Hi Purplewowies, thank you for your contribution to the RfC on Justin Bieber's behaviour and legal issues. Some users have posted that the RfC is currently a mess, and that we need to be very explicit in what we agree to include and what we don't. As such, I have created a second survey, which cuts the content into points. Could you take the time to post your opinion on each point, whether you think it should be included or not, or summarized, or changed. It will be a bit tedious but we need your detailed input to move forward. Thanks again. starship.paint (talk | ctrb) 05:50, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
re:
It's for a school project, thanks!
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
yes that's what I meant.Eloguys (talk) 04:49, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Apologies for the mistake!
I am sorry about calling you a boy, I didn't want to mix it up but when I read your user name I must have missed it but I couldn't find any notification that you where a boy :s deepest apologies I shouldn't have drawn to the conclusion that you are a boy, won't happen again. SilentDan (talk) 21:47, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
ANI
...that's what I meant ;) Cassiantotalk 21:25, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
Why is p inaccessible? [2] 213.7.147.34 (talk) 01:12, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
- User:213.7.147.34: I was referencing the documentation when I asserted that: "However, using <p> tags can cause problems for navigation with screen readers, which expect these tags to delimit paragraphs of prose." I suppose the doc could be wrong, but it didn't seem that way from how I know the tag to work. - Purplewowies (talk) 02:18, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
- Oh, I see. But a p tag would've been right to use inside a list; the accessibility issue (if there's indeed one) is with using it inside footnotes. 213.7.147.34 (talk) 02:27, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
- I must admit I don't know enough about the accessibility issue to be able to find good info outside the documentation right now, though the doc doesn't make it clear that it isn't also talking about lists, not to mention that Mediawiki renders their list-item-level html exactly the same (in terms of used tags), so theoretically, they'd both hit access issues. At any rate, I still feel the change should have been discussed. - Purplewowies (talk) 02:38, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
- The access issue I assume is with auto-dictating the paras inside the footnotes. Indeed, the mediawiki markup is the same, but that's not relevant here. If I'd noticed that note, I wouldn't have made the change. Thank you for reverting it. 213.7.147.34 (talk) 03:22, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
- I must admit I don't know enough about the accessibility issue to be able to find good info outside the documentation right now, though the doc doesn't make it clear that it isn't also talking about lists, not to mention that Mediawiki renders their list-item-level html exactly the same (in terms of used tags), so theoretically, they'd both hit access issues. At any rate, I still feel the change should have been discussed. - Purplewowies (talk) 02:38, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
- Oh, I see. But a p tag would've been right to use inside a list; the accessibility issue (if there's indeed one) is with using it inside footnotes. 213.7.147.34 (talk) 02:27, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:59, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Happy Valentine's Day!!!
Happy Easter!
The Wikipedia Library needs you!
We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!
With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:
- Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
- Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
- Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
- Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
- Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
- Research coordinators: run reference services
Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
You PRODded this, and it was deleted. Undeletion has been requested at WP:REFUND, so per WP:DEL#Proposed deletion I have restored it, and now notify you in case you wish to consider AfD. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 20:06, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dylan and Cole Sprouse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deadline. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:55, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
| This is an archive of past discussions about User:Purplewowies. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 |