User talk:Purplehaze45
Welcome!
[edit]
|
![Notice](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article List of Canadian Hot 100 top 10 singles in 2020 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 08:22, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
I've been making sure to keep this article updated properly each week since I made it 7 months ago, and all sources are reliable and valid. As for notability, there is no other article here that covers a list of songs to chart in the top 10 of the Canadian Hot 100 in 2020. It is essentially the same as the other Canadian Hot 100 top 10 articles from previous years, so I feel that deleting this would be unnecessary. I'd hate to see all the progress be taken out for nothing. What could I do to improve this page to prevent it from deletion? Purplehaze45 (talk) 23:12, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of List of Canadian Hot 100 top 10 singles in 2020 for deletion
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Canadian Hot 100 top 10 singles in 2020 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Canadian Hot 100 top 10 singles in 2020 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Thank you. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 03:13, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]February 2021
[edit] Hello, I'm Magnolia677. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2021 in hip hop music, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:03, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- I re-edited the content with a valid source to represent the album's release for the 2021 in hip hop music article, so that should fix the situation. Now about the edit to the Countdown article, it has been messy for a while now, with consistent vandalism. I was simply getting the page back in order to where it was before. I've been following the updates with this article for some time, and have made sure to keep it as neat and accurate as possible. There was absolutely no intention to ruin the page, on my part. Purplehaze45 (talk) 21:03, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- I have struck my comment above. There has been so much vandalism and unsourced content added lately that many of us have become like Ninjas. I appreciate your hard work. As an aside, I have absolutely no interest in hip hop, but years ago became one of the frequent editors of this genre after writing a Wikipedia article about a relatively unknown musician named Kodak Black (who I hear is now out of the slammer). Cheers! Magnolia677 (talk) 00:04, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
WikiProject Ricky Martin invitation
[edit]![]() |
Hello! I noticed you've made edits to Ricky Martin articles. I thought you may be interested in joining Wikipedia:WikiProject Ricky Martin We are a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to Ricky Martin and his discography. If you would be interested in joining feel free to visit the Participants Page! |
آرمین هویدایی (talk) 19:23, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
August 2021
[edit] Hello, I'm Ss112. I noticed that you made one or more edits to an article, NLE Choppa discography, concerning the updates of review statistics, box office numbers, sports statistics, or some other frequently updated data with a fixed web address, but you did not update the
|access-date=
parameter in the citation template. The |access-date=
parameter is the full date when the content pointed to by the URL was last verified to be working and supporting the text being cited in the article. This means that the parameter needs to be updated whenever the content is updated. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ss112 19:04, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
- I have already warned you about this and asked you to do it several times. Please start updating access-dates when you update peaks. It's really not a difficult thing to do. You shouldn't only be thinking of updating the chart positions, but the dates attached to them as well. Ss112 22:47, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]Unnecessary changing of artist name
[edit]There was no need to do this. It is irrelevant whether The Game is the first credited artist or not. If the peaks show up under Kanye's name, it's fine and should be kept as such. Next time I will revert you for making pointless edits like this. If it's not broken, don't fix it. Ss112 23:19, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)