User talk:Purple Watermelon

Please join

Berlin Debating Union

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Berlin Debating Union, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.debating.de/node/9. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 04:55, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The opening two very generic sentences were largely - though not word for word - copied from their website. This hardly constitutes a copyright infringement.) Purple Watermelon 04:59, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When two of an article's four sentences are largely copied from another website, that is copyright infringement. I have no objection to you recreating the article, provided you write it in your own words and explain why the group is notable. If you could include citations to reliable sources to confirm notability, that would be great! -- But|seriously|folks 03:18, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Controversey surrounding Erskine

I created one of those pages, and I don't think your POV is more valid than mine. In any case, the info is referenced, and is no more biased than any criticism surrounding him. Don't edit it again thanks, rather go to the talkpage, and if you can build consensus to remove it, we'll see won't we...JJJ999 05:58, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Controversey of AUDC

Looks like you're up to your usual tricks of claiming to be seeking consensus, then rounding up partisans. Time to AfD this thing with actual 3rd parties yet?JJJ999 (talk) 07:29, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Berlin Debating Union

The article Berlin Debating Union has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No Claim to notability, no hits when googleing other than article page or subjects own page

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Codf1977 (talk) 18:35, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Berlin Debating Union

I have nominated Berlin Debating Union, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Berlin Debating Union. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Codf1977 (talk) 19:38, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of IONA Debating Circuit

An article that you have been involved in editing, IONA Debating Circuit, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IONA Debating Circuit. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Codf1977 (talk) 15:14, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Singopo for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.Codf1977 (talk) 11:38, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Purple Watermelon/Sandbox

User:Purple Watermelon/Sandbox, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Purple Watermelon/Sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Purple Watermelon/Sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Codf1977 (talk) 14:29, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Asian Universities Debating Championship for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Asian Universities Debating Championship is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asian Universities Debating Championship (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

~ Deloar Akram (Talk • Contribute) 20:10, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]