User talk:PuppyzKittenz

Yamla

@Yamla: Foiled again! How am I supposed to show that I am a constructive contributor and reverting vandalism? Check my contributions! -- 🐶 PuppyzKittenz 🐱 (talk) 03:18, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PuppyzKittenz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I, SlitherioFan2016, have reviewed every single policy on Wikipedia thoroughly.
I now completely understand what edit warring is.
I now completely understand why I am currently blocked, and I will not attempt to change the color scheme at comparison tables again.
If unblocked, what I would like to do is to stick to minor edits and start off by correcting all the grammatical errors at the article List of Pororo the Little Penguin characters, and some recent change patrolling to improve the encyclopedia.
Please unblock my original account (User:SlitherioFan2016) so that I can have another chance to be useful on the English Wikipedia.
I really do promise not to edit war ever again.
I did edit as User:Doge2048 as well as all the other accounts in Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of SlitherioFan2016 and Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of SlitherioFan2016. I did not, and I mean DID NOT, edit as the 108.* IP's.
I did hear User:FisherQueen once saying that seeking forgiveness is especially difficult for sockpuppeteers because the act of sockpuppetry is perceived as dishonest, even if the sockpuppeteer in question is not inherently malevolent. However, she did not say that sockpuppeteers are never unblocked. Rather, she said that sockpuppeteers are rarely unblocked.
Please stop questioning me. I am NOT an evil vandal. I am a genuinely good-hearted person who wants to improve and be pardoned. --SlitherioFan2016 (talk • contribs) 03:24, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Socking to appeal a ban for socking?! Talk page access revoked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:49, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

See [1] - WP:Standard Offer, six months with no socking, is your only realistic chance. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:54, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]