User talk:Punkalicious
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Bookert.jpg)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Bookert.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 02:50, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- I asked WWE itself for permission: still no response yet. Is it alright to change the licenses if I ever get a response? Punkalicious 01:08, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- The image would have to be released under a GFDL license or other equivilent free license. Getting permission to only post it on wikipedia is not sufficent. If you do get a free copy licensed and you want to record evidence of such permission, please send a copy of the email granting permission to "permissions-en at wikimedia dot org" where it will be permanently archived.--Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 01:19, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oh...so the image I uploaded doesn't work at all. WWE states, in their Legal page, that everything posted in the site is of their property. Sorry for the bother. Punkalicious 15:43, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- The image would have to be released under a GFDL license or other equivilent free license. Getting permission to only post it on wikipedia is not sufficent. If you do get a free copy licensed and you want to record evidence of such permission, please send a copy of the email granting permission to "permissions-en at wikimedia dot org" where it will be permanently archived.--Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 01:19, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Image:Morgan Webb.JPG
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Morgan Webb.JPG. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the image description page and edit it to add
{{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 02:50, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Image:Adam Sessler.JPG
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Adam Sessler.JPG. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the image description page and edit it to add
{{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 02:55, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Response to your question
[edit]You wrote
- In a watch I got on the Morgan Webb article, it says "Revert to revision 110091304 dated 2007-02-22 16:27:22 by Punkalicious using popups". May I ask what did you meant with this? Punkalicious 03:05, 25 February 2007 (UTC)"
Someone probably vandalized the article after your last edit. I used a tool called "popups" to automatically revert the edit back to your version. Some people do vandalism reverts manually, but using tools makes simple edits like this much faster --Mattarata 22:05, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Gi-0606.jpg)
[edit] Thanks for uploading Image:Gi-0606.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:29, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Pdz box us bg.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Pdz box us bg.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 03:02, 21 January 2008 (UTC)