User talk:Pultzser

Welcome!

Hi Pultzser! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Schazjmd (talk) 15:07, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:POSS

Hi. I have reversed many of the edits you made here on the Friends article. This is owing to the stipulation in the Manual of Style: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Possessives. Many thanks. NEDOCHAN (talk) 12:08, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fourlaxers

Have you ever heard of this editor? NEDOCHAN (talk) 14:07, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No. Pultzser (talk) 16:39, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok cool apologies NEDOCHAN (talk) 18:17, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:11, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pultzser (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It wasn't vandalism. I was actually finding legitimate errors like typos and false information.

Decline reason:

This doesn't address the reason for your block. Yamla (talk) 22:25, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pultzser (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It wasn't vandalizing anything. I was actually finding legitimate errors like typos and false information. Unfortunately, the user Ponyo thought I was and undid legitimate fixes, like adding periods to missing sentences

Decline reason:

This has nothing to do with what you were blocked for: the abuse of multiple accounts. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:24, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pultzser (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Abuse or no, I was finding a lot of inaccuracy like the wrong years in actors' credits, or lack of spaces in sentences.

Decline reason:

You seem to think that makes your abuse of other accounts okay, it doesn't. If you make another request that does not speak to the reason for the block, you will lose access to this page. 331dot (talk) 09:39, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Furthermore, before you even consider undoing what you call "inaccuracies", search for reliable evidence. That is why most of your edits were reverted. 72.68.90.187 (talk) 01:26, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]