Jump to content

User talk:Pukhtunman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pukhtunman (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Well could I be unblocked? If you look at my history, you'll find most of my changes to be beneficial, and not vandalism

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pukhtunman (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Where did this come from? How would you confirm falsehood?

Decline reason:

Private technical information has confirmed that you are the same person as a blocked user. For more information, please contact Alison directly. Most administrators do not have access to this information, and it cannot be publicly posted due to the privacy policy. — Hersfold (t/a/c) 22:56, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pukhtunman (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

where did that random block come from? For what reason am I being accused of being a sock puppet of whoever? My edits have been aimed at correcting errors and rectifying POV, if some one has a problem with it, he should discuss it on the talk page, not block me.

Decline reason:

Sock per checkuser as per post on this user talkpage. — Cirt (talk) 09:44, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Admins: - this editor is a sock of User:Wasabi salafi koonkati, as proven by checkuser - Alison 06:57, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]