User talk:Pueblo89

May 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bradost (mountain) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bradost (mountain) was changed by Pueblopassingby (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.94506 on 2018-05-14T13:11:33+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:11, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Avalon

There is no need for a hatnote pointing from Avalon (American band) to the disambiguation page, because no-one looking for a different meaning of "Avalon" is going to arrive at the band's page by mistake. I hope that clarifies it for you. Happy editing! PamD 16:46, 14 July 2018 (UTC) There is no need for a hatnote pointing from Avalon (American band) to the disambiguation page, because no-one looking for a different meaning of "Avalon" is going to arrive at the band's page by mistake. I hope that clarifies it for you. Happy editing! PamD 16:46, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @PamD:, Aah, so that's what it is about. Thank you very much for taking the time to clarify this. What you say is true of course. I just thought that having the link to the disamb. page makes it easier to get to said disamb. page, whatever the reader's path to that band's page may have been and whatever his/her motivations may be. i.e. I, and likely other people, like to get curious about other things that bear the same name as what I currently work on, whenever I land on a disamb. page. So once I got a glance at the side topic, the link makes it easier to get back to the disamb. page. This is all the truer when the name is used by a lot of entities - such as Avalon, as it happens. I find that easing up pages manipulations encourages curiosity. But this is really not something worth even thinking about twice let alone fight over. I just wanted to know if I was missing some link or something else. Thanks again. Pueblopassingby (talk) 18:11, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation

Please revert your edits adding hatnotes to disambiguated pages per WP:NAMB. James (^talk/_contribs) 17:47, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No. I do not believe that removing them is judicious. They help finding homonym articles, like all the theatres called "Avalon". Besides, that WP:NAMB page you cite states that " this guideline doesn't prescribe one way or the other ". The fact that you say " Please " does not obliterate the fact that you are trying to pass as a rule a guideline that is not "set in iron", so I wouldn't call that polite but more like a missed attempt at manipulation. Pueblopassingby (talk) 17:59, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mike Tyson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Don McRae. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject

Hi, I see you've contributed a lot to Ebu gogo, would you be interested in a taskforce on oral tradition? Kowal2701 (talk) 15:30, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kyzyltuz / Kyzyltu

Thank you for your good-faith edit of Kyzyltuz (Akkuly District) lake, but the pictures added were of the Kyzyltuz (Zhelezin District) group of lakes far to the north. Also the uranium mine is near Kyzyltu village, in Aktobe Region, not in Pavlodar Region. Xufanc (talk)

Hi Xufanc, damn. I'll take your word for it. Sorry, and thanks. Was trying to give a bit more texture here on the mysterious and fascinating phenomenon of soda lakes, plumping up the list of lakes (and the annex pages) in that article (so far in personal sandbox only). Hard to follow when most sources are in unknown (by me) language, let alone unknown alphabet. Area is badly known too, at least by "Occidentals". Will try for even more circumpstection, but thanks for keeping an eye on future edits of mine on that regard. (Am doing a pause at the moment, letting the chemistry data sink in before I can put them in better order. Might take a while, my specialty is prehistory and I'm hardly better at chemistry than i am at north Asian geography...)

Good continuation to you. Pueblo89 (talk) 11:53, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Attempts at clarification

(reminder: both Aktobe Region and Pavlodar Region are in Kazakhstan)
According to the International Atomic Energy Agency (World Distribution of Uranium Deposits (UDEPO) with Uranium Deposit Classification, 2009, p. 79)
the uranium deposit nearby Kyzyltuz is (in a "Sandstone–Roll Front" type of deposit) in Kazakhstan (south of Kyrgyzstan).
So it would be neither in Aktobe Region nor in Pavlodar Region (both in Kyrgyzstan).
Googlemaps has two Kyzyltuz in Kazakhstan:

in Jelezin area, just south of lake Kyzyltuz (Zhelezin District), neighbouring the border with Russia

in Lebyaji area — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:CB00:86CC:B800:FC55:B961:AF6F:DE02 (talk) 11:39, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Veronica Rudge Green Prize in Urban Design

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Veronica Rudge Green Prize in Urban Design requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.gsd.harvard.edu/urban-planning-design/fellowships-prizes-and-travel-programs/veronica-rudge-green-prize-in-urban-design/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Diannaa (talk) 21:43, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Answer here: Talk:Veronica Rudge Green Prize in Urban Design. Pueblo89 (talk) 01:14, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Summary of the so-called copyright infringing:

-> as per seen on the Veronica Rudge Green Prize in Urban Design's talk page, this consisted in:

"recognizes exemplary", changed for "acknowledges remarquable"

"on the occasion of", changed for "to mark"

and "Harvard University’s 350th anniversary", changed for "the 350th anniversary of Harvard University" - hesitantly thus changed for reason explained in that article's talk page, and half-jokingly because calling that one "copyright infringing" is seriously dumb - but hey, i did use copy-paste for that one too, so let it be noted too.

-> In my answer to Diannaa's calling i also noted a number of expressions / groups of words for which I indicated that I did not find another way for saying what they mean. These were (at this moment these still are):

"urban design projects"

"more than one building or an open space"

" quality of urban life", and

"a humane".

For each of those I wrote: "Do you see another way for saying that? I don't."

Diannaa did not respond to that either. Just removed the call on copyright in the article's page, so we can assume that s/he was satisfied with the changing of those two short expressions. Pueblo89 (talk) 13:30, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Your edit to Seoraksan National Park has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. The source article is not compatibly licensed. © The Author(s) 2018 -- Diannaa (talk) 11:33, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Diannaa:,

I don't understand what's going on with this one. Looking at Seoraksan National Park, that article's revision history:

1)

-> your edit 11:30, 22 October 2024 removes 178 bytes/characters from the article, with edit summary: "remove copyright content copied from https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-018-0332-x = not compatibly licensed".

-> my edit 08:52, 21 October 2024, 824 bytes/characters, is striked off so I assume that 824 bytes/characters have been removed/erased although i may be wrong there, i don't know for sure, it's just what it looks like.

824 bytes, that's about 10 lines in a Word doc. What I know for sure is that:

there is not one single chance that I'd have ever copied 10 lines, as a whole block or as significant separate bits, and plonked them in an article straight-up-no change.

2)

You removed something I took from that sentence in the source:

"Annual precipitation is around 1200–1400 mm but a significant part of it comes as heavy summer rains with daily totals of the order of several hundred millimeters, and occasionally, Seoraksan is hit by a typhoon, with hourly intensities above 100 mm."

One other thing I am 100% sure of, is that i absolutely did not copy-pasted that whole sentence. So what is it exactly that you find was copyvio in it?

3)

That sentence is only 250 bytes. I can't see what else - if anything - you've removed because it's striked off/blocked in 'revision history'; the "Difference between versions" only says "You cannot view this diff because one or both of the revisions have been removed from the public archives. Details can be found in the deletion log for this page" - which does not give any of the content removed.

How am i supposed to learn from my mistakes if you don't allow me to know exactly what it is that you think of as copyvio??? Please do bring out what I wrote that you erased and let us compare the source and what I took from it. Thank you.

Pueblo89 (talk) 16:24, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The net amount of my edit was a decrease of 178 bytes. I removed "but most of it comes as heavy summer rains that may total several hundred millimeters in one day, and the occasional typhoon can bring over 100 mm in just one hour" and replaced it with "with most of the rain occuring in the summer." -- Diannaa (talk) 18:38, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I also removed from your citation the field |type= article published as open access on 15 October 2018. The article is free to read, but is not compatibly licensed. I have to go out now and will be back later today sometime -- -- Diannaa (talk) 18:52, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the side by side comparison: Source says:

Annual precipitation is around 1200–1400 mm but a significant part of it comes as heavy summer rains with daily totals of the order of several hundred millimeters, and occasionally, Seoraksan is hit by a typhoon, with hourly intensities above 100 mm.

Your addition says:

The annual precipitation is about 1,000 mm (39 inches) in Inner Soraksan and 1,300 mm (51 inches) in Outer Soraksan, but most of it comes as heavy summer rains that may total several hundred millimeters in one day, and the occasional typhoon can bring over 100 mm in just one hour.

Identical portions are in Bold. So you've got the same content in exactly the same order with only slightly different wording. That's a copyright violation.-- -- Diannaa (talk) 00:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]