User talk:Puckslider

Welcome!

Hello, Puckslider, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! ~~ GB fan ~~ ^talk 13:39, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

USAA

I have reverted both of your edits to USAA and to the talk page. Blanking the USAA page is not constructive and not the way you ask for something to be done. Blanking the page is disruptive and could be considered vandalsim. As for the talk page, please do not change others comments. Please go back to http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:USAA&action=edit&section=new and reenter your request. This way the old discussions are preserved for reference and a new discussion can take place. If you have any questions let me know. ~~ GB fan ~~ ^talk 13:39, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the link in the above paragraph, please use the new linkto start a new discussion. Sorry if I caused any confusion. ~~ GB fan ~~ ^talk 13:51, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

talk

GB fan: what in heaven's name are you talking about. "Blanking a talk page." Nobody "blanked" a "talk page". The plain and simple fact of the matter is that you are one of many shills who have been paid by USAA to make certain that none of the inconvenient truths about this very strange enterprise ever sees the light of day. Your conduct is part of a larger pattern at Mr. Wales' enterprise whereby Jimbo has agreed (perhaps under duress) to block edits that raise questions about "the money at USAA". In that sense, your feigned desire to bring editorial standards to the Wiki on USAA makes you part of a cover-up.

Roxann Dawson

Hi. Thanks for working to improve the site with your edit to Roxann Dawson. However, the edit had to be reverted, because Wikipedia cannot accept unsourced material or original research. This includes material lacking cited sources, or obtained through personal knowledge or unpublished synthesis of previously published material. Wikipedia requires that all material added to articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable sources explicitly cited in the text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. If you have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. :-) Nightscream (talk) 07:00, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Reciprocal inter-insurance exchange, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Reciprocal inter-insurance exchange was changed by Puckslider (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2011-12-21T00:14:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:14, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This was clearly a false positive, and I've restored your edits. --Carnildo (talk) 05:59, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/U.S. Financial Risk Council.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! (chat) techatology 12:47, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Puckslider, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/robertjkoenig, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

GB fan 11:24, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:USAA

I did not remove either of your comments on Talk:USAA, I just moved them to the bottom of the page. New discussion always goes at the bottom rather than the top according to the convention here on Wikipedia. GB fan 15:08, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Please do not attack other editors, as you did on Talk:USAA. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. GB fan 15:09, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Block notification

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of robertjkoenig (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Orlady (talk) 15:10, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/U.S. Financial Risk Council concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/U.S. Financial Risk Council, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:12, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/U.S. Financial Risk Council

Hello Puckslider. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "U.S. Financial Risk Council".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/U.S. Financial Risk Council}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 20:07, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]