User talk:Pubmix

Speedy deletion of Mister International

A tag has been placed on Mister International requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Hitro 18:04, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

the page should not be deleted because there is no reference for Mister International for it has past 6 titleholders of the old Mister International and i think it should be created here for references.

Speedy deletion of Mister International

A tag has been placed on Mister International requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement [k0nt0l.multiply.com/photos/album/3735/Mister_Singapore_2008]. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hitro 18:19, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Mister International. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Angelo De La Paz (talk) 16:06, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have violated the three-revert rule on Mister International. Any administrator may now choose to block your account. In the future, please make an effort to discuss your changes further, instead of edit warring. Angelo De La Paz (talk) 16:12, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Mr. International (Evidence). If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Angelo De La Paz (talk) 15:42, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Mr. International (Evidence). If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Angelo De La Paz (talk) 15:48, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

While you have been edit warring, I've preferred to protect the article for a day. Please muse the time to make your point at Talk:Mr. International instead of writing comments inside the article. Thanks, --Tikiwont (talk) 16:10, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pubmix (talk) 04:15, 5 December 2008 (UTC)I'm just making my point there! And rearrange the datas into a nicer and pleasantly looking article by showing it more explainable than looking it more complicated. Regarding with Mr. International, im trying to point out that Sharjah is just an emirate and belongs to UAE. UAE is a country Sharjah is not internationally acclaimed as a COUNTRY! For example in this recent years, USA competes in Miss Universe, Miss World, Miss International, Miss Earth and other beauty pageant as MISS USA wherever states the candidate belongs still they representing their state as USA.. same with Sharjah but in that event he won but his crown will count for UAE not for Sharjah.[reply]

Pubmix (talk) 04:25, 5 December 2008 (UTC)In Miss World, im having a hard time fixing the continental queens of beauty. im the one who did the table spending more time doing it. Trial and Error! now with the awards i just want to put contestant choice in the last part for it is the least award given in the pageant and should be placed in the last part. And those who have more awards in a category should be place on top.[reply]

Now, you were making your point by reverting multiple times. Posts like that above regaring UAE belong on the article's talk page that I will now create so that it is easier for you to discuss the issue with others. Tikiwont (talk) 08:50, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sammy Sam 04:03, 23 December 2008 (UTC)I made some changes again in Miss Earth regarding on By Continental regions. Instead of Continental Regions i made BY REGIONS and i patterned the table like in Miss Universe.

"City"

The sensible way of naming these cities is by omitting the word "City" except when it used for disambiguation (i.e. Cebu City and Cebu, Quezon City and Quezon, and Zamboanga City for the Zamboanga Peninsula provinces) or it was renamed during the elevation to cityhood (i.e. Lapu-Lapu City). For all other cases such as Dagupan, Pasay, Bacolod, Cagayan de Oro, the word city is omitted. It's quite funny to see these Philippine city articles with the word "City" at the end. The rest of the world doesn't do it (anyone seen Los Angeles City and Paris City (which redirects to a ship)?) unless for disambiguation (such as New York City, Mexico City and the like). –Howard the Duck 02:36, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SM City Dasmarinas

I removed the list of stores under that articles, as set by Wikipedia's standards (especially under WP:NOT DIRECTORY). The tag itself is clear "Mall directory should not be placed on Wikipedia pages". Wikipedia is not a place to list down the list of stores and mall directories on a mall or shopping center article, such list can be done on that shopping mall's website. Thank you. GrayFullbuster (talk) 03:55, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Pubmix. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Pubmix. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Philippines at the 1978 Asian Games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Joseph. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Philippines at the 2009 Southeast Asian Games, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages James Walsh, Daniel Coakley and Miguel Molina.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Philippines at the 2019 Southeast Asian Games, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 15:58, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Section headings

Hi Publix. Just posting to let you know a few things about "section headings" when it comes to Wikipedia articles to briefly explain why I undid a few of your recent edits to Philippines at the 2011 Southeast Asian Games as well as some other simiar articles.

Wikipedia's Manual of Style advises use to use sentence-case capitalization in principle, except in certain cases, as explained in MOS:SECTIONCAPS.
Wikipedia's Manual of Style also advises use to avoid using redundant words in section headings per MOS:HEAD whenever possible. It's not necessary subsection headings to repeat all or part of a primary section heading, unless doing so helps avoid confusion.

If you've got any questions about these things, feel free to ask them below and I'll try to further clarify them. You can also ask for clarification at the Wikipedia:Teahouse as well, not only about this but also any other general editing questions you might have.

Finally, this is not related to section headings, but it's something you should also be aware of when you editing. Another editor already posted about this above, but for some reason all of your recent edits are being marked as WP:MINOR even in cases where they clearly aren't. Please make sure to check that you only mark you edits as minor when they are minor. Borderline cases are not going to be much of a problem per se, but anything that adds or removes content (even as a table) that goes beyond a simple spelling or grammar correction is likely not going to be seen as a minor edit by many editors and may lead to more warnings like the one you got above. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:44, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miss Asia Pacific International, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Subic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]