User talk:Publicus

Archives

Archive 1 (May 2006 to March 2009)
Archive 2 (March 2009 to February 2010)

Requests for mediation/Qanun

A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Qanun, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible.

Same condition:

Please read history of these articles and so the articles Ceng , Afghan Rubab.

ZANDWEB T

Irak

It is a declaration from this Sunday made by the president of Romania, who says mostly "Romania won't withdraw it's troops from Irak". At the end of this summer, the ministry of Defense of Romania asked the withdrawn of the Romanian troops, however the decision was defavourable to the withdrawn. Anyway, after that there was some time when nothing new appeared, then President Basescu came with this declaration.--Danutz

War in Afghanistan 2001

Yes. The link you have provided lists the casualties in ALL theater of OEF (Philippines, etc.), not just OEF - Afghanistan, while my link clearly lists the casualties "In and Around Afghanistan". 190.10.0.111 14:37, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see. I'm checking with my source to see what exactly they are counting. I proposed an edit hold on this at the discussion page for the War in Afghanistan. Publicus 19:36, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

YOU SHOULD CHANGE THE PIC TO THE COLLAGE AGAIN IT WAS BETTER —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.22.55.132 (talk) 22:03, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

War in Afghanistan (1979-1989)

Good afternoon, Mr. Publikus!

You are writing a member a member of the Russian Wikipedia - ВОИН2 (VOIN2). I see you are engaged in the topic of the Afghan war, including 1979-1989. I want to ask you if you have sources: Books or Articles in authoritative journals about the fortified areas of Afghan mujahideen. In particular, we are interested in the fortification of KOKARI-SHARSHARI Ismail Khan on the Afghan-Iranian border (1986).

We are also interested in material about the fortified area of LOR COH in Farah province in southwestern Afghanistan (1981, 1984). If you are interested in any materials from Russian open sources: Books or Articles of Soviet authors about the events of the War in Afghanistan (1979-1989), we are ready to transfer them to you.

Thank you. VOIN2 (ВОИН2) [1] ВОИН2 (talk) 11:07, 14 June 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by ВОИН2 (talk • contribs) 11:03, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gaza War

There are sanctions associated with this article, please familiarize yourself with them if you mean to intervene here, Respectfully, RomaC (talk) 15:13, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of 2010 in Pakistan

I have nominated 2010 in Pakistan, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 in Pakistan. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Dr. Blofeld 21:58, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2010 in Pakistan

A tag has been placed on 2010 in Pakistan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Odie5533 (talk) 23:13, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Publicus 22:08, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Publicus! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Sibusiso Vilane - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 09:38, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Publicus 22:07, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Collaborative news on quippd

Hey, I noticed that you had recently edited the War in Afghanistan article, and I hoped that you could help out on another collaborative community edited project.

I run quippd, a collaboratively edited social news site, which mixes elements of Wikis, social networking, and social news sites. You can get some more information about what we are doing at: http://quippd.com/about/intro

Basically, we want to get good coverage on news stories, collaboratively edited, like Wikipedia. We are trying to take the ideas of WikiFactCheck -- to make news less biased and speedier (unlike something like Wikinews).

I hope you check us out -- and feel free to contact me with any questions, comments, or concerns.

--Yoasif (talk) 01:40, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds interesting, I'll check it out, thanks Yoasif. Publicus 15:56, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Robert James Miller

Just wanted to say good job on the Robert James Miller article, thanks for creating it. — jwillbur 22:09, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you--just saw some local media coverage about him and thought he deserved a decent article. Sounds like he was quite a guy. Too bad he didn't make it, but I guess he helped some buddies make it tho. Publicus 22:59, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Iraq part of WoT

I agree with you that the Iraq war is still ongoing but there is no need to remove the part of War on Terror from the campaignbox, history will remember it as part of WoT. But I don't get how can those guys claim the war is over when nobody said it's over? Obama said he is ending the war not that he has ended it. o.O Also, I saw that you were the one mostly updating the campaignbox so I hope it's alright that I added the numbers of dead Iraqi SF and insurgents based on the Wikileaks documents? That 55,000 number seemed odd to me.Diefgross (talk) 04:25, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Iraq war date again

Majority concencus has been reached that the war is over Xavier Green made the change based on this. However V7 again reverted him and I, in an attempt to find a compromise solution, reverted to Xavier Green's edit but added that Coalition combat operations concluded but Iraqi security forces operations continue. If V7 reverts again I feel there is no other way to go about this except report him for edit warring or take this to the arbiter with the evidence of the major concencus on the issue.Diefgross (talk) 22:48, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Try reporting him, or ask a user by the name of Kirill Lokshin for some help, he's very good at helping with the war-related articles. This war is over/not over discussion is pretty silly, don't really understand what to call it if it's not a war. Publicus 19:10, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

He cals it police work, anybody thinking police action that was called Vietnam and Korea? XDDiefgross (talk) 22:19, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy, Here's the thing as I have tried to explain to Diefgross (And I am still assuming good faith on his part) Our standard here is Wikipedia:Verifiability. I have actually posted links from Wikipedia:Reliable_sources that have the state department stating that the war is over, the president and pentagon stating that combat operations have concluded, etc. While we may have a disagreement (that doesn't need to get unfriendly) there wouldn't be a anything i could do about it if you were to find something from the state department, pentagon or presidents office that supersedes that. V7-sport (talk) 22:56, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Totally agree V7Sport, which is why I've stopped our little edit war on the date. I'm honestly confused about what to call the current situation since conflict is ongoing and there's no facts to support anyone (Prez, Pentagon, SecState, Iraqis) saying the war is over while hundreds of people are still getting killed. That's why I would like to wait on the end date until enough time has gone by and it really is the end date--or this period is just a pause in the continuing war. Publicus 14:42, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of how it turns out, thanks for the healthy debate. Seriously, I appreciate your point of view. V7-sport (talk) 01:01, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, the same goes for you. Publicus 17:43, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Jordanian Armed Forces

Template:Jordanian Armed Forces has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Student7 (talk) 20:25, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Campaignbox Salvadoran Civil War

Template:Campaignbox Salvadoran Civil War has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 15:45, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Enlisted saudi army vice sergeant.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Enlisted saudi army vice sergeant.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:12, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Enlisted saudi army sergeant.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Enlisted saudi army sergeant.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:12, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Enlisted saudi army master sergeant.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Enlisted saudi army master sergeant.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:12, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Epic Barnstar

		The Epic Barnstar
		For your immense and long term work at Iraq War. More than a thousand edits over the course of five years! No one has come close to showing that much dedication to the article. The dedication you've shown is nothing short of impressive. You're the most deserving person I've ever given a barnstar to, and all I can say is well done! Swarm ^X 14:43, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Have you ever gotten a barnstar for that work before? I would certainly hope so, because if not, this is ridiculously overdue. I was messing around with the article statistics tool and I was blown away by your stats at that page. Over a thousand edits to one article...I don't know the last time I saw that, if ever!! As I said, no one came remotely close to that. I've seen you around I guess...maybe I just remember you because you gave me a barnstar that one time... but I really had no idea you'd contributed that much. Wow. Anyway, suffice it to say you're the most deserving person I've ever awarded a barnstar to. Okay, I mostly give out userpage awards, but the point definitely still stands. Great work Publicus. Swarm ^X 14:43, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey thank you very much Swarm. No, I haven't gotten any barnstars for the Iraq War page. I really appreciate this--it was a lot of work, but I hope the article is in pretty good shape. Hope all is well. Cheers. Publicus 22:45, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Then, again, this is ridiculously overdue. You're more than deserving of this, at the very least. On another note, ~~could I ask for your opinion here,~~ if you have some time? Thanks. Regards, Swarm ^X 01:42, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind about that request, it's been worked out. Swarm ^X 23:49, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1rr violation

Please note that with this edit you violated the one-revert-24-hours restriction as applied to articles pertaining to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Kindly self-revert. Best, --brew crewer (yada, yada) 15:01, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

First I've ever heard of this edit rule, so no. The image doesn't belong on this page--not sure what your hang-up is on it. It's a weapons article, specs, development, use--that's it. No need to show victims--that belongs on the Palestinian rocket attacks page. Publicus 15:56, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ignoring rules because you are not familiar with them is a sure way to get yourself blocked. The top of the talk page contains the following notice, you should read it:

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this page:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

Jeff Song (talk) 18:16, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Nuclear program of the People's Republic of China

Category:Nuclear program of the People's Republic of China, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. CMD (talk) 07:13, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Campaignbox Salvadoran Civil War

Template:Campaignbox Salvadoran Civil War has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:45, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

War in Afghanistan (2001–present)

Hi! I'm fascinated by your self appointed role to decree that images that other editors have deemed add value to the article are "not needed". (OK, I agree that I don't understand the purpose of the CIA image.) But otherwise, WHY have you (singular) decreed that the article does not "need" these images, when others (plural) have decided that they add value? Do you not think it might have been a good idea to seek consensus BEFORE making such god-like decrees? I have been highly tempted to simply revert your edits with the comment: "discuss it on the talk page and get concensus first". But have decided to see what possible justification you can provide for your behaviour. Pdfpdf (talk) 14:15, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment. I deleted those images for several reasons; they were not informative, unique, or representative of the war in general. Also, someone had put a tag on the article that it was too long and needed to be cleaned up, so this was the first steps towards that process. Publicus 20:49, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Collage War in Afghanistan 2010.JPG missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Collage War in Afghanistan 2010.JPG

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 09:16, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:File:Collage War in Afghanistan 2010.JPG

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

File:File:Collage War in Afghanistan 2010.JPG

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:01, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

HESCO bastion article sources

Hey, I was looking through the article that you created on HESCO bastions, and saw that the section on "Protection" is not referenced as to any of its information. Since the information contained within it is based on what you wrote when you started the page, I hoped you would be able to add the references for your information, pass them on to me, or delete the short section.
Thanks in advance, MS10EL (talk) 20:53, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't really remember editing that section. I think the reference to protection might be in one of the general references on the bottom the article. Publicus 14:35, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Collage War in Afghanistan 2010.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Collage War in Afghanistan 2010.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 13:26, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People associated with peak oil has been nominated for discussion

Category:People associated with peak oil, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:16, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Publicus. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Phot john granville.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Phot john granville.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

File:Too-102fw.jpg

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:United States Army

Template:United States Army has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 06:04, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:ISAF troop deployment

Template:ISAF troop deployment has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 15:09, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Important Figures in the Spanish Civil War

Template:Important Figures in the Spanish Civil War has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 06:13, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Publicus. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:German Army

Template:German Army has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 16:29, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Strategic National Stockpile, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CDC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:11, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Juan Covington

The article Juan Covington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I don't see how this biography meets WP:CRIMINAL/GNG. Few mentions in media limited to WP:ONEVENT. No valid merge/redirect target. Mention on the List of serial killers in the United States seems sufficient. Not every serial killer is notable (particularly given his 3 victims, the minimum amount require to get classified as a sk).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:27, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Iraq War Coalition troop deployment

Template:Iraq War Coalition troop deployment has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 05:34, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:ROC (Taiwan) Army

Template:ROC (Taiwan) Army has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:44, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Campaignbox Lower Seaboard Theater and Gulf Approach

Template:Campaignbox Lower Seaboard Theater and Gulf Approach has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:10, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]