User talk:Ptarry

Your submission at Articles for creation: Place of Peace (April 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Place of Peace.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheCascadian 01:24, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Place of Peace concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Place of Peace, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Place of Peace

Hello Ptarry. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Place of Peace".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Place of Peace}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 10:00, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Place of Peace (November 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Place of Peace and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 21:02, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Place of Peace has been accepted

Place of Peace, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LaMona (talk) 18:46, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ptarry. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Place of Peace calligraphy on meditation hall shomen.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Place of Peace calligraphy on meditation hall shomen.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 03:01, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ptarry. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Offer to help

Hello! I see you trying to make productive contributions to the project. I am wondering if I can be of any help to you. I might be able to answer your questions, or point you into a good direction to get answers. I would also offer my help as a copy editor for your additions. I am available if you think I might be able to assist you. Please respond here, on your talk page. I will get an alert when you post here. Hamster Sandwich (talk) 15:48, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(talk), Thank you. Regarding the article for David E Shaner, Yesterday I submitted a revision on Talk:David E. Shaner/Temp and made a comment on the talk page for David E Shaner. I also wrote a note on the person who put the copyvio on David E Shaner letting them know I had done the above. I wanted to confirm that there was not anything else I needed to do to get the copyvio reviewed.

Thank you

19:01, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Could you post links to any relevant pages you would like me to look at? I have a few things going on, so just to save time, and also to have the links here in one place. Also to post your name with four tildes (~'s) in a row at the end of your post? Thanks in advance! Hamster Sandwich (talk) 19:25, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hamster Sandwich, Thank you for the help. Here is the rewrite for David E Shaner, https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk%3ADavid_E._Shaner%2FTemp. This is the one I am trying to get the copyvio concerns address so the copyvio can be removed from the main article, https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/David_E._Shaner.

Regards

(Ptarry (talk) 21:30, 17 December 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Thanks for providing those links. I read that there are copyright violations, but I don't know what they are exactly. I've seen several attempts to get the article into mainspace and you appear to address the issues at every stage. Can you clarify for me, what is the exact problem? What part of that article is causing the hangup? Maybe we just need to rewrite a small part to avoid a copyright vio. Thanks, Hamster Sandwich (talk) 21:53, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hamster Sandwich, The prior version of the article, https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=David_E._Shaner&oldid=866913237, was very similar to the David E Shaner bio. at http://davidshaner.com/davidbio.html. That is the reason for the copyvio. The rewrite on https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk%3ADavid_E._Shaner%2FTemp is my attempt to address the copyvio. Per the instructions on the current David E Shaner post, https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/David_E._Shaner, I am waiting for it to be, "resolved by an administrator, copyright clerk or OTRS agent." I assume this is a smaller subset of the Wikipedia community so takes time for one of them to get to it. Is there a way to see if it's in the que for review? Thanks

I also place a note at https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Copyright_problems/2018_November_2, where the copyvio was listed. I was told this was the correct place by another person in the community. Regards

(Ptarry (talk) 13:46, 18 December 2018 (UTC))[reply]

I think you've done everything the right way, and now as you say "It's all over but the waiting". Let me know how it eventually goes on my talk page, and if it needs anymore work, we'll dive in together. Since there was no problem with notability, it's just a matter of rewriting the text to avoid copy-vios. Cheers! Hamster Sandwich (talk) 18:58, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hamster Sandwich, Thank you! (Ptarry (talk) 19:01, 18 December 2018 (UTC))[reply]

I added the link Talk:David E. Shaner/Temp at the talk page where the review is taking place. It's a good addition, and I don't see any issues with WP:BLP, but that's a minefield! I tend to write aricles like Hermes 3000 and Moon and Sand (Kenny Burrell album). Topics about things, or long dead people who can't complain about their Wikipedia article! But I think it's important to help new editors too. WP can be a pretty grumpy place if you run into the wrong editors! Anything else you need, please feel free to ask. Cheer! Hamster Sandwich (talk) 20:04, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

Administrator, I am working to get the copyvio removed from David E Shaner article (Biography of a Living Person), I have place a rewrite at https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:David_E._Shaner/Temp, and flagged it at https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Copyright_problems/2018_November_2. How do I get and Administrator to review?

Thank you

(Ptarry (talk) 20:07, 24 December 2018 (UTC))

@UserPtarry I think there might be a problem using so much of Shaner's own writing as material cited in that article. Is it possible for you to do a re-write and omit the material you gleaned from Shaner's own books? Cheers! Hamster Sandwich (talk) 15:17, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hamster Sandwich, thank you, I'll look at the reference from Shaner's books to see what a rewrite would do. (Ptarry (talk) 23:52, 27 December 2018 (UTC))[reply]

I added several more reference from outside of Shaner's book, which should allow his reference to remain as they become much less of the sole source. Thanks for the advice. (Ptarry (talk) 19:31, 28 December 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Addendum: Your draft article was redirected to "draft space" from the article talk page by another editor at my request. When I'm creating articles I usually start by creating a draft in the "Sandbox" page. When it's ready to submit I just hit the "Create Article" button. I have just written articles "from scratch" as well, but it's been easier for me to cover larger topics in a draft space. Hope that helped. Hamster Sandwich (talk) 17:03, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hamster Sandwich - thank you for moving the article to the correct place. I placed it at https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:David_E._Shaner based on the copyvio instructions on his original article. If https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:David_E._Shaner is a better place that is great. (Ptarry (talk) 00:02, 28 December 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Does the article now have to be "published" for approval now i.e., moved out of draft, or does it remain here until an administrator comes to review and release it? Thanks (Ptarry (talk) 19:31, 28 December 2018 (UTC))[reply]

If you are certain that all of the issues that have been pointed out regarding copyright vios. have been fixed, I think there is a button on the draft page that says "Create article". Or, you could find an uninvolved administrator to help remove the tags that are on the article page, and they can move it for you. Good luck! Hamster Sandwich (talk) 04:00, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:David E. Shaner has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:David E. Shaner. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:30, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Robert McClenon, thank you, I'll revises and resubmit. (Ptarry (talk) 20:14, 5 January 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David E. Shaner (January 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft needs to be written as a neutral description rather than a hagiography.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David E. Shaner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:David E. Shaner, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:35, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ptarry! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:35, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:David E. Shaner has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:David E. Shaner. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:14, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:30, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David E. Shaner (January 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft still is not neutral. There is no evidence that notability will be established. The existing article, which has copyright issues, has now been nominated for deletion.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David E. Shaner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:David E. Shaner, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:36, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:David E. Shaner has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:David E. Shaner. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:37, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:David E. Shaner concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:David E. Shaner, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:21, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:David E. Shaner

Hello, Ptarry. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "David E. Shaner".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 14:47, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Place of Peace for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Place of Peace is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Place of Peace until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

glman (talk) 22:04, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]