Jump to content

User talk:Prokofiev2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Alexis Monnerot-Dumaine. Paris (France). Alexis.monnerotdumaine@gmail.com

random walk on list of fractals

[edit]

Pourrais-tu preciser ce que tu entend par la dimension de Hausdorff de la marche aleatoire? Formelement, c'est une fractale? Dans quel sense? Et oui, a la limite on obtient une approximation du mouvement brownien, vaudrat-il mieux parler de celui dernier? (De toute facon ca serait pas mal de rajouter des trajectoires browniennes de dimension 2 dans R^n, non?). Beaumont 11:08, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

random walk on list of fractals

[edit]

La marche aléatoire est équivalente au mouvement brownien à la limite, c'est en ce sens évidemment qu'on peut parler de fractale. On y retrouve l'auto-similarité et l'invariance d'échelle caractéristiques. Sa dimension de Hausdorff a été calculée (et même la dimension de sa frontière). Sa dimension est-elle la même dans R² et en R^n ? Je n'ai pas vraiment cherché la preuve, bonne remarque. Si tu la trouves, on peut modifier l'article. Prokofiev2 14:48, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alors, Brownian paths in R^n (n>=2) have Hausdorff dimension 2 with probability one, K. Falconer, "The geometry of fractal sets", Cambridge University Press 1985, section 8.8, page 147. A+ Beaumont 14:51, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Self-avoiding walk

[edit]

How did you create the fractal under "self-avoiding walk"? It's not a real self-avoiding walk (random walk conditioned not to hit itself), is it? It looks too dense... maybe it's the "true" self-avoiding walk, i.e. a random walk that does not cross itself unless its trapped (see e.g. Amit-Peliti-Parisi)?

Uffish (talk) 21:51, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The algorithm is quite simple : When it is trapped it goes backward as many times as necessary, erasing its path, until it finds a possible move. This image was chosen as an illustration among many because it "fits" well in a rectangle.Prokofiev2 (talk) 09:19, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Thomas Coville, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brest (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:57, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:22, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Prokofiev2. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Prokofiev2. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]