Jump to content

User talk:Profmelbourne

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 2014

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Characters of the Drakengard series, without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. GamerPro64 17:52, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Profmelbourne (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Sorry, I didn't realise! Honest mistake.

Decline reason:

As this is a checkuser block, only a checkuser can unblock. I would suggest you request from your main account. Peridon (talk) 15:28, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Profmelbourne (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi, I am requesting an unblock. I made some errors through Wikipedia which stemmed from a lack of knowledge of the protocol, and I did not mean to disrupt or cause any damage. I have done a lot of reading, and am sure that I am now well versed on protocol, and I will refrain from making any edits or changes on Wikipedia unless I am 100% confident that it is correct Wiki protocol and is a useful contribution. Thank you.

Decline reason:

I think you'll have to explain this and the technical evidence linking you to that mess. Huon (talk) 14:24, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi, I am not sure what that is. That page you directed me to had nothing to do with anything that I have done.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Profmelbourne (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

My page has been blocked and I am requesting that it be unblocked. I have had this account for some time, and unfortunately one of my volunteers was trying to do me a favour by 'working some magic' on Wikipedia. I didn't understand exactly what was going on, but I take full responsibility for the disruption that was caused, and can assure you that it will absolutely not happen again. I am really sorry to cause any problems within Wikipedia, and request that you please give this user one more chance, and I will ensure that I am the only one that accesses the user page and I will conduct myself in a manner suitable to Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

I've run a checkuser, and you're  Technically indistinguishable to Ryliebaby123 (talk · contribs). PhilKnight (talk) 17:26, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock|Is there anything that I can do to unblock this account? I am not affiliated with he aforementioned accounts and have apologised, explained my situation and promised not to create any more problems in the future. Thank you}}

Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If you have already appealed to the Unblock Ticket Request System and been declined you may appeal to the Arbitration Committee's Ban Appeals Subcommittee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.