User talk:Professor PC
Bienvenue
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Professor PC's talk page. Please leave all messages below this text.
Professor PC, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]![]() |
Hi Professor PC! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 30 December 2016 (UTC) |
January 2017
[edit]![]() | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:27, 2 January 2017 (UTC) |
Unblock Requests
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
Professor PC (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hello, Boing! said Zebedee, this is Professor PC. These days, I was suspected as a sockpuppet and it made me feel really disrespected. I have made edits with references and you are just saying that it is a false edit and suspecting me as a sockpuppet of ThomasPark02. I am just a normal user who edits articles in a good way. I read some news articles of South Korea and it said Park resigned on 5 December 2016, but you guys are just suspecting me as a sockpuppet and blocking me. If you cannoy trust me, read some Korean articles from Yonhap News or Chosun Ilbo. Also, users mentioned me having same writing style as Thomas. However, I think that some people can have same or similar writing styles. Don't just suspect me as a sockpuppet. See my legacy and good works. Also, read the articles and fix the articles please.
Decline reason:
Technical evidence confirms sockpuppetry. Yamla (talk) 01:58, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
Professor PC (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Once again, administrators, I am not a sockpuppet of Thomas. People use technical evidence, editing style, etc., but the truth is that I am also a user who is trying to make edit like anybody else. Don't discriminate because of those shitty technical reasons. I know that you are trying to cyber-bully me by doing this. This is very disturbing for Wikipedia. I have sources that I can share, but I think you guys won't believe it because you guys can't read Korean. I am almost only Korean translator here, so please unblock me and let me edit.
Decline reason:
Thomas, we really, really mean it when we say that you cannot edit here. Go and do something else somewhere else. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 16:08, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.