Jump to content

User talk:Profane Existence

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Profane Existence, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! — Cirt (talk) 04:31, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thoughts of Ionesco

[edit]

If you are talking about Thoughts of Ionesco which was deleted by myself over 4 years ago as a result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thoughts of Ionesco, I would suggest that the best thing to do is to write a proper draft of an article, showing why it is notable with reference to independent and reliable sources, then submit that draft for review at Articles for Creation mentioning that you need to have it checked to see whether it is sufficiently improved over the previous deleted article to be acceptable. (Administrators can do that, other editors cannot see deleted versions of articles.) Thanks to Bencherlite for the helpful wording I borrowed for this reply, — Cirt (talk) 04:33, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thoughts of Ionesco (American band)

[edit]

Hello Profane Existence,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, Thoughts of Ionesco (American band), may be copied from http://www.mtv.com/artists/thoughts-of-ionesco/. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 05:50, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Thoughts of Ionesco (American band)

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Thoughts of Ionesco (American band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.mtv.com/artists/thoughts-of-ionesco/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bisswajit 06:35, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

[edit]

I see it at Thoughts of Ionesco (American band).

Unfortunately it looks like you have some problems with it, as expressed here on your user talk page, above. — Cirt (talk) 17:28, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but no matter whether it was from Allmusic or MTV, it looks like there was copyvio going on there. — Cirt (talk) 20:53, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:49, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. If you intend to edit constructively in other topic areas, you may be granted the right to continue under a change of username. Please read the following carefully.
Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

Probably not, although if you can demonstrate a pattern of future editing in strict accordance with our neutral point of view policy, you may be granted this right. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again.

What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you may consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.

If you do intend to make useful contributions here about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:

  • Add the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} on your user talk page.
  • Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
  • Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
    • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
    • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

--Orange Mike | Talk 18:58, 11 February 2014 (UTC) Help me out[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Profane Existence (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not doing anything in the interest of promotion/publicity, but, rather, as a music journalist, I wanted to contribute information about some bands who aren't included in Wikipedia. I have no relationship, commercial or otherwise, with these artists; I simple want to contribute. Profane Existence (talk) 19:03, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I disagree that your editing so far has been promotional, and I will therefore be happy to unblock you if you deal with the username issue. You may be working for the Profane Existence record label, in which case if you like you can use a username such as "John at Profane Existence", that indicates that you do so, but not just "Profane Existence", since that suggests that the account is for use not by an individual, but by a business, which is against by Wikipedia policy. Alternatively, you can use a name unconnected with the label, but my personal view is that there is a good case for being upfront about your connection. On the other hand, you may have no connection with the label, in which case your username is against policy because it is misleading, and you need to choose a username which has no connection at all with "Profane Existence". Either way, please choose a new username, and post a new unblock request, but this time using the template {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} instead of {{unblock|Your reason here}}. I can't promise that your request will be accepted, as that will be a matter for whatever administrator reviews it, but I personally see no problem if you choose a suitable username. A word of advice: to avoid wasting time by making a request for a username that is already in use, having it declined, and having to try again, go to the URL https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Special:ListUsers&limit=1&username=Profane+Existence, type your chosen new username into the box in place of "Profane Existence", and click on "Go". If the username you have chosen is already in use, it will show up, so you can't have it: if not, the next one alphabetically will show up, so the one you have chosen should be OK. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:10, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, Profane Existence, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! JamesBWatson (talk) 13:28, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous
  • A little advice on how to go on from here, assuming that you do get unblocked with a new username. You say that you want to "contribute information about some bands who aren't included in Wikipedia". There are two problems there. Firstly, many of them are not included in Wikipedia because they do not satisfy Wikipedia's inclusion criteria, in which case you are likely to find that any work you do to create articles will be wasted, as the articles will be deleted. Secondly, even if you stick to subjects which do satisfy Wikipedia's inclusion standards, being new and unused to Wikipedia's ways, you are likely to find that, without realising it, you do things which are not in line with Wikipedia's standards in other ways, and again find that your work is deleted. Over the years I have seen this happen over and over again to new editors, who come here keen to contribute, and eventually leave, disillusioned and disheartened. In my experience new editors are much more likely to have a successful time here if they start by making small improvements to existing articles, rather than writing new articles. If you do that, then any mistakes you make (which you will, because we all do) will be small ones, and you won't be losing substantial amounts of work. Gradually, you will learn more and more about how Wikipedia works, and after a while you will know enough to be able to write new articles without fear that they will be deleted. Of course, it is up to you, but that is my advice, based on seeing countless editors come and go, and others come and stay, over the seven and a half years I have been here. I am also posting you (above) a "Welcome" template, with links to various pages of information which may be helpful to you. Don't try to read them all before you do any more editing, as there is far too much there to take in, but do look at the ones which seem most relevant to your needs, and of course you can come back and follow links to other pages in the future as and when they become relevant to you. (I know there is already a welcome message from Cirt at the top of this page, but this one has rather more links, as yu can see.) JamesBWatson (talk) 13:28, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Profane_Existence&oldid=1143241562"