User talk:Procariot

Repost of Utopia (online game)

A tag has been placed on Utopia (online game) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hang on}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Wyatt Riot (talk) 23:50, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Utopia (online game) for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Utopia (online game), which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Utopia (online game) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Wyatt Riot (talk) 14:22, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Utopia section in Jolt Online Gaming

I reverted your edits at Jolt Online Gaming for a couple of reasons. First, the consensus was to redirect to that page, not merge the content. It's a minor difference and doesn't necessarily mean we can't add more content about Utopia. However, we are still guided by our due and undue weight policy, which says that article content should be proportional to the reliable sources out there. In short, if there are very few reliable sources (which is true in the case of Utopia, which was why the article was redirected) then we should say very little, at least compared with the rest of the content in the article. I hope this makes sense. Cheers! Wyatt Riot (talk) 16:14, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]