User talk:Princeofrockcontact

This is Princeofrockcontact's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saulo Oliveira S. (October 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MoonlightVector was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most sources are unreliable and therefore due to a threshold of 50% this page will not be accepted

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Saulo Oliveira S. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Saulo Oliveira S., click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MoonlightVector^{Talk page} 14:38, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Princeofrockcontact! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MoonlightVector^{Talk page} 14:38, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saulo Oliveira S. (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No relevant improvement as none of the sources are reliable. Do not resubmit until independent reliable sources are provided. Doing so may lead to the draft being rejected, meaning it will longer be considered.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Saulo Oliveira S. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Saulo Oliveira S., click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 23:07, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Draft:Saulo Oliveira S. ‎, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 03:42, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saulo Oliveira S. (December 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

None of the sources are reliable so should not be used.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Saulo Oliveira S. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Saulo Oliveira S., click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 20:18, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saulo Oliveira S. (December 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Seam to just be promotion - most of the sources are either clearly primary or look like paid PR

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Saulo Oliveira S. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Saulo Oliveira S., click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 14:58, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saulo Oliveira S. (December 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There should be a section about his music career, showing how he meets WP:NMUSICIAN with independent reliable sources. I've made some minor updates to the draft. I noticed that your username is similar to the nickname for this musician. If you work for him or are related to him or have any other conflict of interest, you must disclose it on your user page.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Saulo Oliveira S. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Saulo Oliveira S., click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoingBatty (talk) 00:53, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Hello, Princeofrockcontact, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Hayesheathcliff (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. You also appear to have created or coordinated with User:Jamestaylorleroy so as to move the article about yourself into mainspace. As an administrator, I can either move it back into Draft for you to carry on working on, or will put it up for A deletion discusssion on the grounds of a lack of notability which you were informed of multiple times. Please let me know which you would prefer me to do. Nick Moyes (talk) 23:03, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Princeofrockcontact. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Saulo Oliveira S., you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Nick Moyes (talk) 23:06, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

Saulo Oliveira S. nominated for a deletion review. David notMD (talk) 05:32, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Saulo Oliveira S. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saulo Oliveira S., to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saulo Oliveira S. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AFD - Saulo Oliveira S.

The page is not an autobiography. The mistake was to have used a username that refers to the biographee's surname to edit the article. Realizing the possibility of confusion, I tried to use my own name and email in some editions, Hayes. I am not related to the biographee.

The source errors are now fixed and only reputable sources remain on the page.

The issue of the orphan article must need the editing of whoever understands better to solve it.

I'm counting on everyone's understanding to save this article.

Your thread has been archived

Hi Princeofrockcontact! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Reliable sources, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hiding the AfD discussion

You deliberately 'hid' the AfD by removing the period from the tag. This goes beyond vandalism. Do not repeat this action or you will be indefintely blocked from editing, the article will be deleted, and the topic will be 'salted,' meaning that any attempt to start over again after the deletion would require permission from an Administrator. David notMD (talk) 23:08, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is OK for you to edit the article while it is at AfD (adding or sybtracting refs), but do not change the AfD or the other tags. David notMD (talk) 23:11, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Saulo Oliveira S.

I tried to edit the source the other day by removing the non-reliable (wiki standdards) such as soundclound or spotify and it turned out to be that it was considered vandalism. I did not remove the red tags because i know that is mandatory. I'm definitely not a vandal, I was just trying to contribute to improving a page in this community. I have this constant feeling that any contribution on my part is not welcome, despite all being well intentioned and in line with wiki standards.

This email I use with the fan account name obviously can generate debate and mistrust so I tried to use my own name (Hayes) and email for editing but I was accused of having multiple personalities. I keep saying it's not an autobiography and I don't know the artist nor work for him. The statements used to discredit the authenticity of the cited sources are expressions such as "may not be trusted" and even "probably". Judgment on the quality of sources and depth of coverage seems to be subjective. Some editors have assumed the hypothesis that the author wants to self-promote, this is something thoughtless and discriminatory since I, who don't know him, am the one who gathered the material and I was never paid for this work. It's almost insulting.

You can see from the amateurishness of my contributions that I'm not a writing professional and I would have liked to have had a lot more help with editing than I had from other contributors.

I hope you make the right choice, not delete the page and that someone helps me improve this work.

Speedy deletion nomination of Saulo Oliveira S.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Saulo Oliveira S. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:36, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]