User talk:Prince ovy

Welcome!

Hi Prince ovy! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 17:46, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock ip

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Prince ovy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. I'm used to public wifi.My IP address is 103.112.151.13. Prince ovy (talk) 05:34, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We don't generally modify those autoblocks in open proxy situations. And it will be a while before the present one expires. But ... you can go to WP:IPECPROXY and request IP block exemption, following the instructions, in the meantime if you can't find somewhere not blocked to edit from. — Daniel Case (talk) 05:48, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

IP block exemption

Hi @Daniel Case: I'm can't Eadit other page.That's why I can't go to another rights page and apply for rights. Please I beg you to give me the right(IP block exemption) here.thank youPrince ovy (talk) 07:06, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You won't need to edit. If you had been to the other page, you'd see you could make the request via email. Daniel Case (talk) 07:08, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

GeneralNotability (talk) 01:13, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Prince ovy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologize, that my user account is not for abuse. I have a constructive contribution to English wikipedia. And I apologize if I'm wrong when using Wi-FI to edit wikipedia. Because I don't have more data plan to edit using cellular data, so I use public wifi. If I'm involved in another account, that's not me and maybe it's my college friends, who are using shared public wifi on my campus. Prince ovy (talk) 18:29, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm inclined to agree with @GeneralNotability here. This isn't just a matter of using the same wifi - this is a very specific device. This isn't an artifact from helping the blocked user create an account based on timing. SQL ^{Query Me!} 01:29, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Prince ovy, why were you trying to log into Vedbas? Is that also your account? And before you say it wasn't - I can see the device used to log in, and it's the same device and the login attempts were made at the same time as you logged in. GeneralNotability (talk) 22:27, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@GeneralNotability: Thank you for the response. Sorry in advance, that I have no connection with any account, I don't know who is online at the same time using the same smartphone or laptop. we have a big campus and connected to 1 public wifi. i forgot if i ever helped my friends to create their account, if it happened to vedbas user, i'm sorry, because i forgot about it.Prince ovy (talk) 06:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC) @GeneralNotability: I apologize.My case is two days old. Please review. Prince ovy (talk) 18:38, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see it, but I would prefer that somebody else do the review. A couple of checkusers patrol the unblock request category, they'll have a look at this soon enough. (Reviewing CU, feel free to ping me for details). GeneralNotability (talk) 02:19, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Prince ovy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@GeneralNotability:Sorry in advance, that I have no connection with any account, I don't know who is online at the same time using the same smartphone or laptop.I apologize and request you to unblock me and next I will be careful not to let any friend use my mobile laptop.we have a big campus and connected to 1 public wifi. i forgot if i ever helped my friends to create their account, if it happened to vedbas user, i'm sorry, because i forgot about it Prince ovy (talk) 19:12, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:25, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@GeneralNotability and Yamla: To the administrators, I have understood that I will increase my good contribution to wikipedia, also I promise, if I do something and I violate the policy, and make things detrimental to Wikipedia, I am ready to be blocked. But I'm not responsible for the vedbas account, because I'm not in control of that account. Thank you, and please consider.Prince ovy (talk) 12:20, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@GeneralNotability: please review my request.few days old.Prince ovy (talk) 17:47, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Prince ovy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@GeneralNotability, SQL, and Yamla:@Ferret and RoySmith: my block few months old.@Yamla: reviewed my old unblock requested and now Yamla condition answer. Please review my block. To the administrators, I have understood that I will increase my good contribution to wikipedia, also I promise, if I do something and I violate the policy, and make things detrimental to Wikipedia, I am ready to be blocked. But I'm not responsible for the vedbas account, because I'm not in control of that account. Thank you, and please consider.Prince ovy (talk) 18:55, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:15, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Prince ovy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please review my block.I've been blocking Wikipedia for Six months and my CrossActivity. To the administrators, I have understood that I will increase my good contribution to wikipedia, also I promise, if I do something and I violate the policy, and make things detrimental to Wikipedia, I am ready to be blocked. But I'm not responsible for the vedbas account, because I'm not in control of that account.and Please can you see 'I've been making good contributions to other Wikipedia projects' Prince ovy (talk) 18:42, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I suspect that most of the evidence in this case has gone stale. We don't keep information on IP addresses and what happens on them indefinitely, and eventually we have to just go on gut instinct and what evidence we can still see. And, to be frank, your first few edits are very suspicious. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:42, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblocked

After consulting the blocking admin, the Arbitration Committee has now unblocked this account. Best, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 07:04, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@L235: Could you please clarify whether this unblock constitutes amnesty for the sockpuppetry in May as Gjsljs (talk · contribs) (and various other sox, as disclosed here)? -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 03:48, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@TamzinGjsljs is my not account.Besides, I am acknowledging that these are my accounts Prince ovy (talk) 03:52, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

... it's not your account, but you acknowledge that it is? -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 03:53, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The rest is my account I want to say this but Gjsljs not Prince ovy (talk) 03:57, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So Faofln (talk · contribs) is your account? -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 03:58, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Tamzin: When asked to disclose what accounts this user has used in the past two years, the user disclosed only Skh_sourav_halder (talk · contribs) and denied using vedbas (talk · contribs). With the concurrence of the blocking administrator, we offered a ROPE unblock. If the user has in fact used other accounts, I would consider that to be grounds for re-blocking both for sockpuppetry and for obtaining the unblock through deception. Prince ovy, I would appreciate an immediate explanation, copied to arbcom-en

wikimedia.org. Best, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 04:09, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@L235 Except for the accounts that are reported Skh_sourav_halder, I have not used any accounts, but there are no accounts from within it as presented by Tamzin Prince ovy (talk) 04:58, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@TamzinFaofln is not my account Prince ovy (talk) 04:14, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What account have you edited the English Wikipedia from most recently, other than this one? -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 04:24, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No Prince ovy (talk) 04:56, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you see [1] Prince ovy (talk) 04:59, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You keep contradicting yourself. Please, below, give a definitive list of every account that you have edited the English Wikipedia with. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 05:19, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Was locked for lock evasion 39 minutes after I asked that question. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 06:02, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]