User talk:Prez2016
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Prez2016, and a warm welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you have enjoyed editing as much as I did so far and decide to stay. Unfamiliar with the features and workings of Wikipedia? Don't fret! Be Bold! Here's some good links for your reference and that'll get you started in no time!
- Editing tutorial, learn to have fun with Wikipedia.
- Picture tutorial, instructions on uploading images.
- How to write a great article, to make it an featured article status.
- Manual of Style, how articles should be written.
Most Wikipedians would prefer to just work on articles of their own interest. But if you have some free time to spare, here are some open tasks that you may want to help out :
Oh yes, don't forget to sign when you write on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments. And finally, if you have any questions or doubts, don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Once again, welcome! =)
- Mailer Diablo 16:03, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
Lt. Governors
[edit]Thanks for your work with lt. governors, but there is already a category for state lt. governors, Category:State lieutenant governors of the United States. --tomf688{talk} 01:11, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
NJ Cabinet members
[edit]It's a brand new category, but [[Category:State cabinet secretaries in the United States]] seems way too broad if it only has NJ cabinet members. I'd suggest creating [[Category:State cabinet secretaries in New Jersey]] and making it a subcategory of [[Category:State cabinet secretaries in the United States]]. Then all of the NJ cabinet members would be in a logical group, even when subcategories are created and populated for the other 49 states. Alansohn 01:28, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- There are more than 20 members listed on Richard Codey's page and that's probably typical nationwide. Do the math, and 20 members times 50 states equals 1,000 people in the category, and every 2% has nothing to do with the other 98% and a list that's impossible to manage or use. With state-level cats you'd have a nice neat group of 20 or so members, plus people who served in the past and it's managable. I'm happy to help if you need it.
- I fixed both the Union County page and the template. It's been a rough time with all of the NJ governmental changes at virtually every level. Alansohn 01:43, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
Please see my comments regarding your recent edit to this page. Can you provide a source which suggests Crist was at one point an educator? Or can you justify adding the category based on his tenure as Commissioner of Education? I'd be interested to hear your line of thinking on this. See you there. Thanks. ALC Washington 20:37, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
- I replied to your response several days ago. Please see the talk page. ALC Washington 23:34, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
New Jersey edits and WP:NJ
[edit]I want to thank you for all of your work on New Jersey-related pages. I would like to invite you to participate in Wikiproject New Jersey, a very loosely organized group of nearly two dozen people who are working on filling in and expanding the details on Wikipedia of all things New Jersey. Membership has no obligations (and even fewer priveleges), but if there is anything about New Jersey that you would like to work on (and you'be already proven a strong interest), i think you will find a number of like-minded people. Alansohn 23:37, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
Robert Caro
[edit]Just wanted you to know that I corrected your alumni category from Columbia to Princeton. I don't normally let people know this, but it was right there in the article that he graduated from Princeton in 1957 and it didn't look good (where did you get that info, anyway?). Daniel Case 04:58, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
OK. I'll put that in the article then (a lot of people forget this, but categories should reflect article content). Daniel Case 03:50, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for participating in Wikiproject New Jersey. In an attempt to create articles for some of the non-existing pages related to New Jersey, NJCOTW was recently created to bring members of WP:NJ together to work collaboratively on a certain selected topic, which this week is List of Governors of New Jersey. Please help by nominating/voting/commenting on articles on WP:NJCOTW, or by helping to improve articles in the scope of the topic for the NJCOTW. AndyZ 00:51, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
edit summaries
[edit]Hey, could I ask you to use edit summaries when putting lots of articles in categories? It just saves a lot of people time double-checking. — Laura Scudder ☎ 00:55, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
State treasurers
[edit]William Donald Schaefer is not the Treasurer of Maryland, he is the Comptroller of Maryland. The Comptroller is the chief financial position in the state, though, which I assume is the goal of your template. You may want to reconsider changing the name of the template to something more ambiguous, such as Template:U.S. state chief financial officers or something similar but shorter. --tomf688{talk} 03:06, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry I just assumed it was you. --tomf688{talk} 03:17, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
==Please Use Edit Summaries==
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labelled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:
The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.
When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you.
¡Dustimagic! (T/C) 04:42, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
Category:County Government Officials in the U.S.
[edit]Hi, you might want to hold off before you get too far along in adding Category:County Government Officials in the U.S. to a whole lot of articles. It seems a rather unwieldy and poorly defined category. older ≠ wiser 02:05, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
Jane Hadley Barkley
[edit]An anonymous user has added a succession box to the Jane Hadley Barkley article you created, however they did it incorrectly. Since I don't know how to fix this problem, I have tagged the article for cleanup and explained the situation on the article's Talk page. --TommyBoy 05:41, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Nevermind, another user has fixed the problem. --TommyBoy 01:08, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
WikiProject New Jersey advisory
[edit]
Help Wanted! Articles are languishing, categories are stagnating, assessments are missing, the portal is static, and you can help.
You are cordially invited to visit the redesigned WikiProject New Jersey and invite others to do the same.
You are receiving this message as a member of WikiProject New Jersey. You can remove yourself from the mailing list here.
- Notice delivery by xenobot 01:17, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter (August 2008)
[edit] The WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
| Project News | Article Alerts | ||
| The Reboot of Wikiproject New Jersey has certainly stirred up some new activity at the project. Discussion on several improvements and new initiatives have been going on at the talk page. There has been an involved discussion regarding our 116 unassessed articles, especially those on municipalities. The current goal is to review and assess all 566 New Jersey muncipality articles by September 30. A suggestion has been made to intiate Wikipedia Takes New Jersey to begin clearing the large backlog of articles needing photos. Let's all grab our cameras and head out into the vast wilds of the Garden State. Town Halls, High Schools, Historic Places - every article deserves a picture. |
The following articles may be in need of attention:
Featured Article candidates:
Good Article nominees: | ||
| New Jersey Collaboration news | New WPNJ members | ||
| WPNJ member Mm40 has volunteered to coordinate a new WPNJ Collaboration project. It's been a while since we used the NJCOTW and new volunteers are needed. Join the discussion to volunteer.
Battle of Trenton was recently proposed as a Featured Article candidate. It was not promoted, but has now been nominated for A-Class review through the Military History WikiProject. Take a look at their A-Class FAQ. As we need to set up our own process for reviewing A-Class articles, it may be worth watching the process. |
Please welcome the following new members to WikiProject New Jersey:
| ||
| Reboot progress report | Help Wanted | ||
| The redesign has been well received. There are still some things left to do. This newsletter was one big check mark off the list. Hopefully this can be continued on a regular basis. There are literally thousands of articles in Category:New Jersey that have not been tagged as part of the project, and stub sorting hasn't been run in 10 months. We will need to identify some friendly bot operators to help with these projects. An outreach department (which includes the newsletter) needs to be formalized. Creating an invitation template for easy placement on userpages will also be part of that effort.
There are lots of best practices described at the WikiProject Council with ideas of how to make our project more responsive, welcoming, active, and effective. Task forces? Peer review? Other ideas welcome! |
| ||
| Editor's Notes | |||
| I just wanted to say that the response to my bold makeover of WPNJ has been gratifying, but nothing will improve the project as much as more activity, and that means more members. There are lots of things to do in this new setup, and everyone with an interest should be able to find a way to contribute to the collaboration. I want to thank you all for the patience, the appreciation, and the effort. - Jim Miller | |||
| You are receiving this newsletter as a member of WikiProject New Jersey. To stop receiving these messages, remove your name here. | |||
- Newsletter delivery by xenobot 18:50, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter (September 2008)
[edit]| The WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
| Project News | Article Alerts | ||
| The Maryland WikiProject has put together a great chart comparing the growth of several state WikiProjects, including WPNJ. Take a look at the chart to see how the growth of WPNJ compares to some of our peer projects. Please remember to place the {{WikiProject New Jersey}} tag on the talk pages of any New Jersey related articles you create or come across. You can also add the new articles page to your watchlist. Some updates have been made to the NJ Portal, but much more needs to be done. If a few volunteers can put together Featured Article summmaries, we can automate rotating the portal content. The same can be done for DYK items. Please take a look and see if you can assist. |
The following articles may be in need of attention:
Featured Article candidates:
Good Article nominees:
| ||
| Wikipedia Release version 0.7 | New WPNJ members | ||
| The Wikipedia 0.7 project team has chosen the New Jersey related articles that will be included in the next downloadable version of Wikipedia. You can review the list of selected WPNJ articles, check the articles tagged for cleanup, or nominate additional articles for inclusion.
Selection is an automated process based on article assessments. To help avoid vandalism and POV concerns, specific versions of articles can be tagged for inclusion in the downloadable release. See the New Jersey section of the bot results to recommend a production version. The process ends on October 20, and then a bot will select an appropriate version if none has been recommended. |
Please welcome the following new members to WikiProject New Jersey:
| ||
| Article News | Help Wanted | ||
| Both Jon Corzine and The Sopranos were promoted to Good Article status in the past month. No WikiProject New Jersey articles were promoted to Featured article status. Battle of Trenton was not listed as a Featured Article, and may need more editors to complete the remaining work to be promoted. Also, in an item that was missed last month, Thomas Edison was delisted as a Good Article in July.
The WPNJ Assessment Drive is ongoing. Please help assess all of the articles about places in New Jersey. There are currently 116 articles that have not been assessed. |
|||
| Editor's Notes | |||
| Fall has arrived, and with it will come a rush of new Wikipedians. Inviting new editors to join WPNJ is easy to do, and can help us improve our New Jersey articles. Keep an eye out for editors who work on NJ articles who can help the project. The Wikipedia Release version project is in its final stages for the next version. Take a look at the article lists, cleanup where you can, and nominate articles that should be included on the DVD version of WP. Lets make sure that those who end up with a downloaded copy of WP get solid articles about New Jersey. - Jim Miller | |||
| You are receiving this newsletter as a member of WikiProject New Jersey. To stop receiving these messages, remove your name here. | |||
- Newsletter delivery by xenobot 16:32, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter (October 2008)
[edit]| The WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
| Project News | Article Alerts | ||
| A new bot is patrolling Wikipedia workflows to let WPNJ members know when any of our articles may be in need of attention. Any article tagged with the WPNJ banner that has been added to one of the major workflows (AfD, FAC, GAN, etc.) will be added to a new project page. The bot runs daily, so add the new Article Alerts page to your watchlist, or just check the main project page to see the updates. See the Article Alerts project page for details on how the bot works and which processes it covers. | The following articles may be in need of attention:
Featured Article/List candidates: Good Article nominees:
| ||
| Cross-Project Collaboration Request | New WPNJ members | ||
| WPNJ received the following request for assistance with New Jersey Devils articles: "The WikiProject Ice Hockey is currently looking for editors to help update team articles about the 2008-09 NHL season. If you are interested in the NHL, please consider helping us keep these article current. To sign up, go to this page and add your name beside the team or teams you wish to particpate in." See the WPNJ talk page for more information. |
Please welcome the following new members to WikiProject New Jersey:
| ||
| New Jersey on the Main Page | Help Wanted | ||
| No, not the state - the battleship! On October 15, USS New Jersey (BB-62) was the Featured Article on the Wikipedia main page. Featured articles receive heavier traffic when they are on the main page. Improving WPNJ articles to featured status can help drive more editors to our project. |
| ||
| Editor's Notes | |||
| Seems like a pretty light month in terms of activity at WPNJ. Personally, your editor was doing a lot of travelling and went on a wiki-free vacation for nine days. Time to dive back in and create some new NJ articles. - Jim Miller See me | Touch me | |||
| You are receiving this newsletter as a member of WikiProject New Jersey. To stop receiving these messages, remove your name here. | |||
- Newsletter delivery by xenobot 13:31, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Category:United States political leader templates
[edit]There is some discussion of the format of templates in Category:United States political leader templates such as {{U.S. State Attorneys General}} and {{U.S. State Secretaries of State}} going on at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Biography#State_by_state_100.2C000_population_city_and_mayors_templates. Feel free to discuss.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 18:19, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter (November 2009)
[edit]| The WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
| Project News | Article Alerts | ||
| Education Task Force - The conversion of the former WikiProject Education is New Jersey has been completed. New Jersey education-related articles are now supported by the Education task force. The project banner has been updated to fully support the task force with independent importance ratings. No More Comments - A proposal at the Village Pump has resulted in the deprecation of comments subpages. These were usually found at Talk:Article title/Comments and contained little more than assessment notes. These pages were not widely watched, and are often a hidden location for vandalism and BLP violations. WPNJ has 104 articles that used these pages. A complete list of them, along with their contents, can be viewed at Wikipedia:WikiProject New Jersey/Deprecation of comments. It is up to the members of WPNJ to decide what to do with this information. |
The following articles may be in need of attention:
Featured Article candidates:
Good Article nominees: | ||
| Municipality template compromise; School Districts (almost) complete | New WPNJ members | ||
| Legislative templates in municipal articles - A rather lengthy discussion ran from the end of August until the end of October regarding the use of our legislative district templates in articles about local municipalities. Many WPNJ members commented on the concept, and a proposed compromise seems to have been reached. The templates will require some adjustments to fit the new wording, but should result in more directly relevant sections about County, State, and Federal representation in our articles on cities, towns, villages, townships, and boroughs. Hopefully, more dicussions like this can result is some kind of Manual of Style to bring greater standardization to all of these articles. School District articles now comprehensive - WPNJ Founder Alansohn recently reported that almost all of New Jersey's school districts now have articles - "I have created the article for the last missing (non-vocational) school district in the state." Congrats to Alansohn, who I am sure would love more members at the Education task force to help maintain these articles! |
Please welcome the following new members to WikiProject New Jersey:
| ||
| Watch These Pages | Help Wanted | ||
| Want to do more to help WikiProject New Jersey? Here are some suggested pages to add to your watchlist: |
| ||
| Editor's Notes | |||
| Editor's news. OK, so I am going to try this again. It's been a little over a year since our last edition, and activity at the project was a bit slow during that time. Things have picked up again over the last few months, so once more into the breech I go. I will try to produce this newsletter on a regular basis (bi-monthly?) to see if we can get some more activity going at WPNJ. Help is always appreciated, and there is plenty to do. - Jim Miller See me | Touch me | |||
| You are receiving this newsletter as a member of WikiProject New Jersey. To stop receiving these messages, remove your name here. | |||
- Newsletter delivery by xenobot 14:10, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
[edit]
Hello Prez2016! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 24 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
- Henry F. Wojtaszek - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Charles Richman - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Frank Pelzman - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Regena Thomas - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Chuck Hunt - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Jan Cellucci - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Ninfa Segarra - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Herbert Berman - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Joyce Dinkins - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Frank Milano - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
More...
|
|---|
|
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:36, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter (January 2010)
[edit]| The WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
| Project News | Article Alerts | ||
| New Statistics Table There has been an upgrade to the WP 1.0 bot that updates our project's summary table. The new table lists all page classes including Portal-class, Redirect-class, and Disambig-class. We now have a better picture of the scope of the WikiProject and the pages that we cover. New York Times to charge for access The New York Times is an invaluable resource for properly referencing articles, but especially due to its extensive archives and coverage of New Jersey issues. The announcement that metered content will be started in 2011 has the potential to make article sourcing much more difficult. It also causes a need to update linked sources in articles before all of the NYT links go dead. Any link can be archived on demand by using WebCite. We can help avoid dead links by archiving any article sources from the NYT. |
The following articles may be in need of attention:
Featured Article/List candidates: Good Article nominees: | ||
| All BLP, All the Time | New WPNJ members | ||
| BLP Issue Boils Over There are discussions all over the 'pedia about deleting close to 50,000 unreferenced Biographies of Living People. We won't get into a rehash here, but let's just look at what we can do. There is a new item on the project task list for sourcing BLPs. All articles that are in both Category:People from New Jersey and Category:All unreferenced BLPs are now available on this work list. These articles need to be sourced, PRODded, or sent to AfD. An ounce of prevention Unreferenced BLPs are one of the catgories regularly listed in the WPNJ Cleanup listing. New articles are also a prime location to find articles that do not yet have references. You can keep an eye on the New Articles list to help prevent the workload from getting any larger. Can we do more? There are bots that will automatically add the WPNJ Project Banner to all articles in our designated categories if we have consensus to request it. Join the discussion here. |
Please welcome the following new members to WikiProject New Jersey:
| ||
| In NJ, politics means article updates | Help Wanted | ||
| New Leaders in NJ Government Over the past 2 weeks, new legislators have been sworn in, the legislature has new leadership, the 55th Governor of New Jersey has been inaugurated, and we have our first Lt. Governor. All new members of the Legislature have at least stub articles, and many of the templates have been updated. Updating templates Many New Jersey articles utilize stadardized templates to convey information. With elections happening as often as they do in this state, January is always a good time to review these templates and update them with new information. Does your town or county have new elected officials? It's maintainance time on many of our articles on municipalities and counties as well. |
| ||
| Editor's Notes | |||
| Editor's news Must have been some winter holiday season in New Jersey, because the project talk page has been unusually quiet. I thought with all that snow, many of us would be inside and doing things here at WP. I hope you all had a wonderful holiday season and are enjoying a healthy and happy 2010!! - Jim Miller See me | Touch me | |||
| You are receiving this newsletter as a member of WikiProject New Jersey. To stop receiving these messages, remove your name here. | |||
- Newsletter delivery by xenobot 13:51, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Susan Tietjen
[edit]
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Susan Tietjen. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Tietjen. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:15, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
The article Henry F. Wojtaszek has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Henry F. Wojtaszek is a non-notable local official.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Prodmaster (talk) 22:02, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
The article Peg Bennett has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Unsourced BLP about the wife of the man who was acting governor of New Jersey for all of three and a half days. No significant coverage found.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Michig (talk) 09:57, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of James Hartmann for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Hartmann is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Hartmann until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. J04n(talk page) 18:20, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
The article Jack Quinn III has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 13:24, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
The article Mary Jo Codey has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Not seeing much that would make this person in her own right notable enough for an article. It looks like she was married to a new Jersey governor and does some mental health advocacy work. The two sources given link to bios on government pages.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wlmg (talk) 23:34, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Frank Pelzman
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Frank Pelzman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AusLondonder (talk) 18:37, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Co-hosts of The View
[edit]
Template:Co-hosts of The View has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rob Sinden (talk) 09:17, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:GMA Anchors
[edit]Template:GMA Anchors has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rob Sinden (talk) 07:54, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:ABCEveningNewsAnchors
[edit]Template:ABCEveningNewsAnchors has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rob Sinden (talk) 07:55, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Nomination for merger of Template:GoodMorningAmericaAnchors with Template:GMA Anchors
[edit]Template:GMA Anchors, which you created on May 23, 2006, has been nominated for merger with Template:GoodMorningAmericaAnchors, which was created by User:KeltieMartinFan on May 25, 2009. You are invited to comment on the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 May 26#Template:GoodMorningAmericaAnchors. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 22:36, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Today (U.S. TV program)
[edit]Template:Today (U.S. TV program) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rob Sinden (talk) 12:17, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:ABCEveningNewsAnchors
[edit]Template:ABCEveningNewsAnchors has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rob Sinden (talk) 15:27, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:20/20Anchors
[edit]Template:20/20Anchors has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rob Sinden (talk) 15:27, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Today (U.S. TV program)
[edit]Template:Today (U.S. TV program) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 22:35, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:GMA Anchors
[edit]Template:GMA Anchors has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rob Sinden (talk) 13:32, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Maryanne Connelly for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maryanne Connelly is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maryanne Connelly until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rusf10 (talk) 03:33, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Christopher Callaghan for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christopher Callaghan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Callaghan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Marquardtika (talk) 22:45, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of C. Scott Vanderhoef for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article C. Scott Vanderhoef is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C. Scott Vanderhoef until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Marquardtika (talk) 22:49, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Todd Caliguire for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Todd Caliguire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Todd Caliguire until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rusf10 (talk) 00:01, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Thomas Shea for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas Shea is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Shea until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:13, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Maggie Brooks for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maggie Brooks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maggie Brooks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 14:47, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
The article Laureen Oliver has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Does not meet notability guidelines
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WebsterNerd11 (talk) 21:43, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Laureen Oliver for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laureen Oliver until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.