User talk:Pressure Thirteen

Notability of Steve Bucci

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Steve Bucci, by GlassFET (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Steve Bucci seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Steve Bucci, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 21:26, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Angela Russell

I have nominated Angela Russell, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela Russell (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Tavix | Talk 01:02, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Pressure Thirteen! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 10 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 120 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Maria LaRosa - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Stephanie Stahl (reporter) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Dick Standish - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Mike Puccinelli - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Drew Levinson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Valerie Levesque - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Walt Hunter - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Mary Stoker Smith - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Pat Ciarrocchi - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Denise James - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 16:02, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Walt Hunter

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Walt Hunter. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walt Hunter. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Stephanie Abrams (reporter)

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Stephanie Abrams (reporter). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephanie Abrams (reporter). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Denise James

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Denise James. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denise James. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Mary Stoker Smith

I have nominated Mary Stoker Smith, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Stoker Smith (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Joe Chill (talk) 01:50, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Drew Levinson

The article Drew Levinson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lack of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Milowent • ^talkblp-r 13:55, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Karen Rogers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karen Rogers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karen Rogers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 23:29, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lauren Wilson

The article Lauren Wilson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NSKATE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:38, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]