User talk:Prem555

Welcome!

Hello, Prem555, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --A Nobody^{My talk} 19:47, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Terminator Salvation

Please stop adding Arnold to the cast list. Arnold is not in the movie. His likeness is in the movie, but he himself is not in the movie. He is also not credited as being in the movie in the film's credits. Also, IMDb is not a reliable source, and the movie is not 130 minutes long. I know, because I saw it. The movie is just under 2 hours, not just over it. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 13:19, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Budget

Please do not remove reliably sourced information. Both The-Numbers and Box Office Mojo are accepted sources, and since they have a slight variation in their budget info we use both numbers to reflect a range. Neither is probably 100% correct. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 15:47, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:TransformersPoster2.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:TransformersPoster2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:10, 12 June 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MaenK.A._Talk 13:10, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Films Project Invitation

Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's film-related articles. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining WikiProject Films? We are a group of editors dedicated to improving the overall quality of Wikipedia's film-related content. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of participants. We also have a number of regional and topical task forces that you may be interested in joining as well.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future! Collectonian

-- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 18:22, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rollbacking Articles

Hi there. Just a quick note, if you ever want to rollback to delete an unhelpful edit can you please use the undo button. This way the history of the article is more easily seen, as you are not making a new change, but just undoing someone elses edit (such as on the Terminator page). Thanks!

About the critical reception of The Wolfman (2010 film)

Hi there. I suppose you're a fan of this film. But a 32% "rotten" rating on RT is not a mixed reaction. Even on Metacritic, a score of 43 is verging on the threshold of "generally negative" (which is 40). And this issue has already been raised on the talk page of the movie. So, please stop adding a POV sentence to that section. Thank you. - Artoasis (talk) 00:48, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Terminator Salvation

1) Per the note in the article, do not update the box office without updating the cite date. 2) Please stop restoring your edits without any edit summary. 3) You've re-added this material, incorrectly, at least twice now. Please review WP:3RR. Thank you. Doniago (talk) 13:18, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Terminator Salvation, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. • CinchBug • 06:15, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines‎. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --IllaZilla (talk) 06:06, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SIMPLE

Wikipedia has some basic WP:SIMPLE rules. One of the simplest things you are asked to do is to provide an edit summary explaining your changes. If you disagree over content discuss it on the Talk page.

Do not remove sourced material. You have repeatedly deleted sourced information from the Iron Man 2 article without any attempt to explain your actions. You deleted a reference to the website TheNumbers.com which provides similar information to Box Office Mojo. Depending on what time of day you look The Numbers or Box Office Mojo has the latest figures, both sources are just as good and there is no reason to delete one or the other, both should be kept. A comment in the Wiki source explained that two sources allow the figures to be more easily verified. (Also you removed Bugdet figures sourced from a LA Times article which were more detailed and more authoritative than those provided by Box Office Mojo.) If you disagree with a source discuss it on the talk page. -- Horkana (talk) 11:33, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I do not want to have to waste both our time reporting you to the administrators but if you continue to make the same disruptive edits to the Iron Man 2 article and fail to engage in discussion or even show basic good faith by providing edit summaries you will leave me with no choice. -- Horkana (talk) 15:13, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

STOP. Follow the WP:SIMPLE Rules and provide clear edit summaries. Again you removed sourced information and failed to even say why. The-numbers.com provides accurate and specific information. Box Office Mojo frequently rounds figures and is not as specific as The-numbers.com -- Horkana (talk) 17:39, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Terminator Salvation, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 13:55, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing sourced content from the article without explanation. Feel free, however, to participate in the talk page discussion at Talk:Terminator Salvation#Negative vs. Mixed. If you continue to remove the content without giving any explanation via talk page or edit summary, then I will be left with no option but to report your edits as vandalism. --IllaZilla (talk) 16:42, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Terminator Salvation. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. I'm sorry, but your continued unwillingness to use either an edit summary or the talk page to explain your edits leaves me no choice but to treat them as vandalism. I hope that you can learn to use these tools to explain and discuss your edits. --IllaZilla (talk) 18:06, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Doniago (talk) 18:19, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Terminator Salvation, you may be blocked from editing. --IllaZilla (talk) 07:57, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Please have a look at the following articles on Wikipedia editing:

Thanks. a_man_alone (talk) 08:38, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war at Terminator Salvation. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Tim Song (talk) 18:03, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Wednesday, June 16

Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to X-Men Origins: Wolverine , without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 12:52, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Terminator Salvation critical reception

Greetings. It appears that there is still disagreement on the critical reception wording in the Terminator Salvation article. Please do not make any further changes without discussing the issue on the article's talk page and reaching a consensus. If you continue to make controversial edits and do not participate in the talk page discussions, your actions may be considered disruptive and may lead to a further block or even an indefinite suspension or editing privileges. I would hope it does not come to that.

Your contributions are welcome, but please remember that Wikipedia is a collaborative process and participation in talk page discussions is an important part of that process. Thank you. -- Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 07:18, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Predators (film). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Additionally, please do not replace sourced content with unsourced material. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 16:36, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Doniago, this user Prem555 keeps misbehaving, I just hate to get dragged into the administration process but I'll support a complaint. I'd much prefer if an administrator could have a long talk and get Prem555 and get him/her to follow even the WP:SIMPLE rules but I fear the repeated poor behavior leaves us with little choice but to ask for a ban. -- Horkana (talk) 00:36, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really feel like this merits an ANI report given that Prem seems to have kept their nose (mostly) clean since they were blocked. That being said I wish they'd show any inclination to actively discuss their edits. If edit warring becomes an issue again, or there is an indication that Prem desires to keep inserting unsourced material, my views will likely change. Cheers. Doniago (talk) 13:10, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Please do not continue adding a minor bit-player in a paragraph designed for special featured performers in Iron Man 2. You have reinserted the same actress, claiming she is a role which your reinserted citation simply and plainly does not say. This paragraph is not meant to list every bit player in the role of "cab driver," "diner cashier" or "cop." I understand this particular actress is lovely but she is a non-notable bit player and it is inappropriate to fannishly reinsert her without discussion after other editors have removed her and provided proper edit summaries, which you have not. --Tenebrae (talk) 07:32, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

In a recent edit to the page Tomb Raider (2012 video game), you changed one or more words from one international variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. —Mike Allen 08:48, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Cowboys & Aliens, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 14:05, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 16:23, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Terminator Salvation article

You were previously involved in the discussions. Please weigh in and join. 94.230.85.129 (talk) 16:17, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]