User talk:Prcjac

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added to the page The Sarah Jane Adventures do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Yamla 20:40, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article Tommies (Website) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Kinu ^t/_c 15:04, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I went to the website in question and it said I was the 723rd visitor. This, given with the lack of information in the article, leads me to believe that the site does not meet notability criteria outlined at WP:WEB. The lack of any assertion of notability made the article worthy of speedy deletion. If you can provide any information whatsoever indicating that the site is notable, then you are free to recreate the article. Otherwise it will likely be deleted again, possibly speedily. FYI: the comparison to Bebo is not a good argument, by the way, as Bebo is one of the top 100 most popular sites on the web, per Alexa.--Kinu ^t/_c 15:23, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dolphin smart community script

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Dolphin smart community script, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -FisherQueen (Talk) 16:14, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply regarding Dolphin smart community script

Okay, but you must understand that lack of information is not the problem with this article, it is the lack of outside references (reliable sources) that assert notability. If you could find some 3rd party news coverage or something that talks about Dolphin, I think that would be reflect favorably. --Jaysweet 18:16, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signing comments on Talk pages

Hey there. I'm glad you are going to look for 3rd party sources, that is great. One tip for editing Wikipedia: When you make comments on talk pages, you should always sign your comment by ending it with four tildes, i.e. ~~~~ This will automatically add your username and a timestamp so that other users can follow the comments easier. (Of course this is only used on Talk pages, not on articles themselves)

Welcome to Wikipedia, and happy editing!! --Jaysweet 18:20, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Yahoomailfinal.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Yahoomailfinal.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 09:29, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

preview

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thanks again. --Naohiro19(Talk Page/Contributions/mail) 04:39, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Yahoomailfinal.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Yahoomailfinal.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:53, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Davros2008.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Davros2008.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:07, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Davros2008.png

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Davros2008.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:36, 29 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

More specifically; Please provide a link from where you have obtained the image. Thank you. — Edokter • Talk • 10:36, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Davros2008.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Davros2008.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fasach Nua (talk) 16:46, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Davros2008.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Davros2008.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:15, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dolphin on the table

Boonex Dolphin smart community script

Dolphin is on the table again. This time it really does need reliable 3rd party sources with exact references included. If you are still interested in editing that article, please chip in. --Baba Bom (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:03, 19 July 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Proposed deletion of Boonex Dolphin smart community script

The article Boonex Dolphin smart community script has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

product with no evidence that it passes WP:GNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ironholds (talk) 00:05, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Boonex Dolphin smart community script

I have nominated Boonex Dolphin smart community script, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boonex Dolphin smart community script. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ironholds (talk) 23:22, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I found you!

Hi, my name is Matt and I was wandering around on Wikipedia and I found you in the "View history" page for Windows 7. I was just wondering, how did you get so many contributions!? Like seriously dude you got like 500! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matthewm27 (talk • contribs) 18:46, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I found you again

Well good wishes to you! I just find it rare to find an article with anything wrong with them, so I wasn't sure how you got so many edits. Matthewm27 (talk) 02:18, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:11, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:DolphinBoonex.png

The file File:DolphinBoonex.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]