User talk:PraveenStakez

Welcome![edit]

Hello, PraveenStakez, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Praveen Stakez, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Curbon7 (talk) 08:29, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Praveen Stakez[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Praveen Stakez, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Curbon7 (talk) 08:29, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear wikipedia team i know that i had went against your guidelines and rules, but i am the first time here wikipedia i didnt follow your guidelines properly please unblock me from next time i will be carefull when i am preparing the new article i will follow the guideline and also about the promotion or business promotion the mistake which i had made in the artile will not be repeated again i am requesting you to please unblock my account PraveenStakez (talk) 13:04, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 08:34, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Praveen Stakez (February 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ArsenalGhanaPartey was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Praveen Stakez and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Praveen Stakez, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 17:23, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PraveenStakez! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 17:23, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, PraveenStakez, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you created or edited appears to be an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians—as this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor. We require individuals to meet Wikipedia's definition of a notable person to accept articles about them.

The page you created about yourself may well be deleted from the encyclopedia. If it is deleted and you wish to retrieve its contents, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page. If your contributions to an existing article about yourself are undone and you wish to add to it, please propose the changes on its talk page.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 19:21, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Ingenuity were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:PraveenStakez/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:PraveenStakez/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

>>> Ingenuity.talk(); 16:55, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:PraveenStakez/sandbox[edit]

Hello, PraveenStakez. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:PraveenStakez/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:07, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Praveen stakez (December 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Tol were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Praveen stakez and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tol (talk | contribs) @ 17:13, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Praveen stakez[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Praveen stakez, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Silikonz💬 23:51, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PraveenStakez (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia team i hope so i was blocked due to promotion and advertising as i had made without knowing but as i am blocked in Wikipedia as you know the blocked user has no authority to view and edit other articles,i accepted my mistake what i have done, but i wanna get unblocked because i want to improve Wikipedia by making articles like unknown species as i had found some unknown species in which i want to add them to Wikipedia give me chance, to get a chance to be a Wikipedia User

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:19, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

PraveenStakez (talk) 15:27, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear wikipedia team i know that i had went against your guidelines and rules, but i am the first time here wikipedia i didnt follow your guidelines properly please unblock me from next time i will be carefull when i am preparing the new article i will follow the guideline and also about the promotion or business promotion the mistake which i had made in the artile will not be repeated again i am requesting you to please unblock my account

December 2022[edit]

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Silikonz💬 23:52, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Silikonz i know that i had went against your guidelines and rules, but i am the first time here wikipedia i didnt follow your guidelines properly please unblock me from next time i will be carefull when i am preparing the new article i will follow the guideline and also about the promotion or business promotion the mistake which i had made in the artile will not be repeated again i am requesting you to please unblock my account PraveenStakez (talk) 13:02, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at Praveen Stakez. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:21, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sailikonz i know that i had went against your guidelines and rules, but i am the first time here wikipedia i didnt follow your guidelines properly please unblock me from next time i will be carefull when i am preparing the new article i will follow the guideline and also about the promotion or business promotion the mistake which i had made in the artile will not be repeated again i am requesting you to please unblock my account PraveenStakez (talk) 13:02, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Praveen Stakez[edit]

Hello PraveenStakez,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Praveen Stakez for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

VickKiang (talk) 09:24, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear wikipedia team i know that i had went against your guidelines and rules, but i am the first time here wikipedia i didnt follow your guidelines properly please unblock me from next time i will be carefull when i am preparing the new article i will follow the guideline and also about the promotion or business promotion the mistake which i had made in the artilce, it will not be repeated again i am requesting you to please unblock my account

yours

Praveen Stakez PraveenStakez (talk) 13:09, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Praveen Stakez[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Praveen Stakez, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:21, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Spiderone i know that i had went against your guidelines and rules, but i am the first time here wikipedia i didnt follow your guidelines properly please unblock me from next time i will be carefull when i am preparing the new article i will follow the guideline and also about the promotion or business promotion the mistake which i had made in the artile will not be repeated again i am requesting you to please unblock my account PraveenStakez (talk) 13:03, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To be unblocked you need to write using the following template {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} replacing 'Your reason here' with the reason why an admin should give you another chance. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:30, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

PraveenStakez (talk) 15:09, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wikipedia team as i had been blocked due to promotion and advertising as i had made without knowing but as i am blocked in Wikipedia as you know the blocked user has no authority to view and edit other articles,i accepted my mistake what i have done, but i wanna get unblocked because i want to improve Wikipedia by making articles like unknown species as i had found some unknown species in which i want to add them to Wikipedia give me chance, to get a chance to be a Wikipedia User PraveenStakez (talk) 15:30, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PraveenStakez (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Admin I want to be unblocked because i wanna make other articles and also i wanna edit other articles in Wikipedia and also as i went against your guidelines i apologize for the mistake i had done, give me a another chance where i can create a other articles in order to create a article i want to be unblocked. i hope i will hear a quick reply from you yoursfaithfully Praveen Stakez

Decline reason:

There's no reason to unblock you if you're only here to create an article about yourself. Furthermore, you do not seem to have the necessary competence in written English to be editing the English edition of Wikipedia. If you'd like to make contributions that don't involve promoting yourself, I'd suggest contributing to the wiki of your native language. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 05:30, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

PraveenStakez (talk) 03:19, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PraveenStakez (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia team as my account is blocked due to self promotion and advertising as i Didn't follow the Wikipedia policy's correctly and now i had followed and learnt my mistakes i had done. I strongly apologize for the mistake i had done. I will ensure that to keep the Wikipedia clean such that it will be for knowledge purpose not for promotion and advertisement and follow your guidelines properly i want to Use Wikipedia for knowledge purpose. Requesting you to please unblock my account such that this kind of mistake will not repeat again I kindly request to unblock my account, allowing me to contribute positively to Wikipedia once more. I assure you that I will not repeat the same mistakes, and I will make every effort to maintain the integrity of Wikipedia. yours Faithfully Praveen Stakez

Decline reason:

This does not convince me you plan to stop writing about yourself. Yamla (talk) 15:24, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PraveenStakez (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Admin about the last review you had been reviewed my block request that you are not convince that i will create my own page on wiki you are right cause its your job to protect the Wikipedia from self promotion and advertising as i am very new to use Wikipedia didnt know much about it and the admins think after unblocking me i would again go against the policy or guidelines cause recently i had promoted my own page on wikipedia by self promoting and puttiing unwanted links in the page yes it hurts wikipedia a lot i understand cause its not for promotion purpose as it is for knowledge purpose give me one chance as i had learnt a lesson now this will never ever repeat again i hope this small message finds you helpful and i know you care about users you cant hurt users right as we all are equal kindly accept my apologize

Decline reason:

This reads like Molly Bloom wrote it for you, which makes me even less certain of your competence. At least her sentence is otherwise grammatical and correctly spelled. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:12, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are not permitted to edit or remove declined unblock requests for your currently active block. Please do not do so again. --Yamla (talk) 19:14, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]