User talk:Pr12402

Welcome!

Hello, Pr12402, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Bristeil, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! KH-1 (talk) 00:10, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bristeil

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bristeil requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. KH-1 (talk) 00:10, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Indie music scene, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Open Space. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Your recent edit to List of lead vocalists appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 02:51, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pr12402. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, see the conflict of interest guideline and frequently asked questions for organizations. In particular, please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, its competitors, or projects and products you or they are involved with;
instead, propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing, and autobiographies. Thank you.

Orphaned non-free image File:Split Before Together Now cover artwork.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Split Before Together Now cover artwork.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:40, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Review Suggestion

Hello! I've noticed that you have edited quite a number of articles on Belarusian music scene. Could you please review my draft article on a Belarusian band and help decide on its notability: Draft:Nebulae_Come_Sweet. Thank you. Daria adv (talk) 15:21, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hair Peace Salon, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gipsy, Hover and Next Level (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Pr12402. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kirsten Nimwey

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kirsten Nimwey requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cabayi (talk) 20:10, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All her books are self-published - how does that show notability? Cabayi (talk) 20:13, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hair Peace Salon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hair Peace Salon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hair Peace Salon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cabayi (talk) 10:58, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hair Peace Salon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CTV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

COI warning

Hello, Pr12402. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Hair Peace Salon, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 07:28, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking

Hi, thanks for your edits. Please note that we don't normally link common terms, dates, etc. Tony (talk) 04:37, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Harkin Deximire

The article Harkin Deximire has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The subject's work appears to have only been published on DeviantArt and vanity press. No coverage in reliable sources to be found, does not meet WP:GNG, WP:NAUTHOR. Having "won" NaNoWriMo, while a nice personal achievement, is definitely not enough to meet WP:ANYBIO and is the literary equivalent of finishing in your local marathon.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:05, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

Hi. I have created a Conflict of interest Noticeboard discussion about your edits to Hair Peace Salon article. Please join the discussion to explain the nature of your edits. -- Bbarmadillo (talk) 19:37, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jitters and Hair Peace Salon

These two bands should notPr12402 be listed as Britpop nor post-Britpop or any other category that should only include British artists. Jitters and Hair Peace Salon are Belarusian, not British. Dean12065 (talk) 19:01, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 07:58, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hair Peace Salon

Hi @Pr12402: I came across your article and I see that it has rather too many references within the article. With that many references in the article it makes it impossible for the reader to read it properly, it makes it impossible to verify those references. So Wikipedia has created a policy for this called WP:CITEKILL. It is worth reading it. I think every fact should have one reference, a good one but really no unless there is some other salient information that can fit the sentence and support the fact via verification, so in that instance you might have two or three if it is a complex sentence with several facets. I've removed a whole bunch of reference from the article but it still needs more reviewed and removed. Some of the references that remain are not the best, but they can be replaced by better ones. Stuff like blogs and event listing, page listing stuff like that are considered non-RS. Hope that helps. scope_creep^Talk 12:39, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Promo Disk 2005 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Promo Disk 2005 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Promo Disk 2005 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:27, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jitters Promo CD 2005.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jitters Promo CD 2005.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:00, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Drezden (band)

Looks like it passes notability criteria now, I'd resubmit it. Ping me if you do, and I'll review it. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:37, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Drezden (band) has been accepted

Drezden (band), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:04, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

For creating Drezden (Drezden album). Keep up the good work! Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 06:01, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mutual aid

Hello Pr12402, I hope you are doing well. Remember when you asked me to help you several times with a number of Wikipedia articles? Well, now I would really appreciate it if you could return the favour. Someone is once again trying to delete an article about a Belarusian band with no good reason. If you agree with the facts about the article's sources actually being reliable and the article itself being of good quality, then please show your support by saying you'd like to keep the page at this discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Messed Up (2nd nomination). Thank you. --Samotny Wędrowiec (talk) 09:21, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, there!

I would suggest to strip the article down, removing all social network service links plus vague «references» based on YouTube, VK, Facebook. It will help me and other to dig into the intel for better understanding of the case.

There would be found some sources I’m going to add to the article to bolster up notability though:

https://cafebabel.com/en/article/belarus-messed-up-punk-scene-5ae00bcbf723b35a145e7ecc/

https://www.racyja.com/kultura/garadzenski-messed-up-edze-u-tur-pa-polshchy-i-n/

https://www.racyja.com/kultura/u-garadzenskikh-messed-up-debyutny-albom/

Apparently, the band is touring abroad now, so there is going to be churned out news coverage. So, let’s wait!

In case of the deletion of the article, you may have its code backed up to revitalize it with new references down the line per above.

Have a great day! - pr12402, 6 November 2019

Thanks for the help, have a lovely day too. --Samotny Wędrowiec (talk) 07:05, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jitters and Britpop

It appears that you tried to add Britpop-inspired Belarusian bands at List of Britpop musicians, but was disproven by @CouchJarvis, who explained the exact same thing as I did to you about why Jitters shouldn't be listed as Britpop. I suggest you removing Britpop and other British only-related genres from Jitters, or else I will report you. 24.127.236.115 (talk) 14:26, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 24.127.236.115,

Thank you for your point! You may know that Wikipedia is not a reliable source, so your nod to another Wikipedia page is unimportant. There are facts in the reference section of an article to nod to. Furthermore, from my opinion, CouchJarvis has been reigning over the page List of Britpop musicians voluntaristic, furnishing the defined list by his own will, like it was called “List of Britpop musicians from the UK and the years 1990–1999” or so (sort of an original research flirting to be deleted per WP:NOTCATALOGUE’s “non-encyclopedic cross-categorizations” or so). If you are interested in the topic, I would kindly suggest you to focus on fleshing out the reference section of that article to bolster it up, since it was barely assessed to be kept within Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Britpop musicians back then.

Have a nice day! (◕‿◕✿) -- pr12402, 8 January, 2020

Well, pr12402, the least we can say is how funny it is you should not take some valuable points into account only to state that "from your opinion, [I've] been reigning over the List of Britpop musicians page". Your opinion, I'm afraid, is irrelevant, but since you've opened that particular door, let me make it clear that "from my opinion", what truly and exclusively matters is that any definition you will ever find of "Britpop" will highlight not only the musical elements that make Britpop bands Britpop bands, but also the cultural and geographical elements that make those bands part of the actual Britpop scene. Long story short, "Britpop" stands for "British pop". And Jitters are not British. Since personal tastes and opinions seem to be today's flavour, let me add I'm a huge fan of Swedish band Kent that definitely displayed a Britpop-inspired sound during, at least, the first half of their career... But since they're Swedish, I've never even considered including them in the List. I'm pretty sure you could come up with a "List of Britpop-inspired Slavic bands" of some sort, and I can assure you I would never try to "reign" over this one. Have a nice day too, by all means. CouchJarvis (talk) 03:40, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dead-url=

Hi, I notice you future-proof citations when you add them by including archive-urls, which is really helpful. Just to let you know "dead-url=no" is no longer supported in cite templates and "url-status=live" has superseded it. Regards --John B123 (talk) 22:04, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop using dead-url= which is no longer supported and causes error messages to be thrown. --John B123 (talk) 08:53, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello Pr12402. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Pr12402. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Pr12402|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. I'll note you've got several COI inquiries on your talk page and haven't responded to any of them, please do so before you edit again. Praxidicae (talk) 18:56, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I edit for free. -- pr12402, April 29, 2020

pr12402 this also asks about your conflict(s) of interest, are you saying you have none for any of the articles you've edited or created? Praxidicae (talk) 19:19, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There were no conflicts of interest on top of edits were made for free and voluntary. -- pr12402, April 29, 2020

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have an undisclosed financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future. – bradv🍁 20:28, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Bradv:, why you decided that I've been receiving money for edits and blocked me without a public discussion/investigation or so, since I've never got a cent for any edit? How to prove that? -- pr12402, April 29, 2020
You have been repeated asked to explain the nature of your relationship with the various subjects you write about, such as Hair Peace Salon, Bristeil. Every time you have ignored the question or responded with a very incomplete understanding of what the undisclosed paid editing policy actually entails. Please reread the COI policy, the various messages on this talk page, and reply in detail to the block notice above. Whether or not you have received a cent is irrelevant – if you stand to benefit in any way by promoting these subjects, you need to disclose that relationship. – bradv🍁 21:45, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 30384

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Pr12402 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #30384 was submitted on 2020-04-30 14:43:54. This review is now closed.

User asked to post unblock request here. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 16:24, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

After clashing over The Athletic with Praxidicae (removing sourced content in chunks (Forbes, Washington Post), ignoring Talk:Baseball_Prospectus#List_of_staff_writers and its results, defining "consensus" between two editors by herself without hearing additional opinions), she asked me on paid advocacy User_talk:Pr12402#April_2020, where there were none of that, as I wrote down. After that, apparently, she canvassed Bradv‬ beyond the Wikipedia sphere with 7+ million pages to come across, because, seeing at her https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Special:Contributions/Praxidicae and his https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Special:Contributions/Bradv edit logs for April 29, about 22:00 UTC) he imposed a direct (!) ban on me without public investigation citing Undisclosed paid editing, why there were no connections between two of us in recent edits, talks. After asking Bradv‬ to bring along instances of receiving money, he has been unable to name one but referenced to the Hair Peace Salon, Bristeil pages where I stopped adding content in accordance with previous allegations that were "proven" with no consensus. ¯\_(°ヮ°)_/¯ Seeing at the logs of these pages, there were basically wikilinking edits to new articles created by me for last 1,5 years. pr12402, April 30, 2020

Since you pinged me here, I'm not going to bother pointing out three of the boldfaced lies you've made but all I'll say re: your insinuation that I ignored this, I'd invite you to take a moment to read what was said and take a look at the date. A discussion between two editors 12 years ago about an entirely different article has nothing to do with anything. Also your block isn't about my behavior or anyone else's, so you'd be better off discussing your own behavior instead of "but they did this to me first!" PS: accusations of bad faith and canvassing need to be substantiated. Praxidicae (talk) 20:51, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Xlam cd.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Xlam cd.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]