Jump to content

User talk:Pròssia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 2024

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Spicy (talk) 11:45, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pròssia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I have been notified that my account has been blocked indefinitely. I would like to know what offense I have committed. I have not been involved in any edit wars or anything like that. I do not have two accounts nor have I used them to abuse any page.Pròssia (talk)

Decline reason:

You were blocked based on WP:CHECKUSER data indicating you were abusing multiple accounts as per El Caganer and The Penfield Homunculus. Yamla (talk) 12:57, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have verified the CU evidence that lead to the block, it is indeed  Highly likely in this case. --Yamla (talk) 13:02, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pròssia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This blocking is an abuse. I expect a well reasoned answer. Wikipedia disabled me the option to create a new user for 15 days to use multiple accounts (I didn't know it couldn't be done, sorry. I was new here). After the punishment was served, I created a new user (Pròssia). This user has not broken any regulations or is involved in any irregular situation. I take it you don't want me to edit wikipedia ever again? Why did you allow me to create a new account with the same IP but not allow me to edit? I repeat, it is an abuse. You are punishing me several times. Pròssia (talk) 14:19, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You need to return to your original account and request unblock there, or at a minimum explain why you can't. Either way, you will need to speak to the reason for the original block. 331dot (talk) 16:23, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

How can I resolve this? Pròssia (talk) 14:23, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I was blocked for edits made in: Catalonia (talk page). I have not edited in any case on this page with the new user Pròssia (talk) 14:49, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Blocks apply to the person, not just the account. Until the block on your original account is lifted, you personally are not permitted to edit Wikipedia. See WP:BLOCK, WP:EVADE, WP:SOCK. --Yamla (talk) 16:14, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pròssia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wish I could go back to the original user (The Penfield Homunculus) but I've lost my passwords. Please be able to reverse this situation. I will not do multi user actions again. It was new and I thought it could be done. I was blocked from editing on the Catalonia talk page and I have not edited with this user again to prevent any further blocking. Again, I am not involved in any edit war nor have I committed any wrongdoing with this user. I wish I could make productive edits on wikipedia. Please give me a solution, thanks. Pròssia (talk) 04:35, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

User subsequently evaded their block and engaged in sexual harassment. Yamla (talk) 10:08, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please place new posts at the bottom. This may be easier to do if you click "edit" at the top and not "reply". I'm not a CU(only a CU can authorize the removal of this block) but it's likely any solution is going to involve the standard offer. 331dot (talk) 09:19, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Pròssia! Your additions to FC Barcelona have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:06, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pròssia&oldid=1224114223"