User talk:Powerrranger

Discussions here are welcome, but please try to keep discussions about particular articles' talk pages on those articles' talk pages Powerrranger (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, Powerrranger, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to Jerry Only seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Rob van vee 05:55, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Hello, I'm Muboshgu. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Pete Buttigieg seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:50, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK! While I disagree with your POVPowerrranger (talk) 13:57, 3 December 2019 (UTC), I'll stick with this page https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Pete_Buttigieg_2020_presidential_campaign Powerrranger (talk) 13:57, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rethatable fair use File:FrankieJonas.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:FrankieJonas.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:10, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Geraldo Perez -- thanks for walking with me here. I've been editing Wikipedia for more than a decade but have never uploaded a photo because some of the regulations around them. I firmly believe Frankie, who's now 19, deserves an image that doesn't depict him as a 10 year old, so any help you could be in making that happen's appreciated =] Powerrranger (talk) 19:44, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It would be nice to have a more recent photo but at least we have one. Sometimes it is very hard to get an infobox image for bio articles because of the restriction they must be free-use licensed so this is a problem for a lot of articles. There may be free-use images of him with his brothers that can be cropped to show him. Sometimes there are YouTube videos that are released free-use that we could grab a screen cap from. Jonas hasn't been too active recently so a picture of what he looked like when he was most active is somewhat appropriate but I agree a new one would be better. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:42, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Frankie Jonas is far more active today than 9 years ago. He's also an adult today, so I actually believe no image is better than depicting him as a 10 year old. Are all YouTube videos free use? Geraldo Perez thank you for educating me about image uploading processes. Objectively I have much more experience as a text editor than an image editor. Powerrranger (talk) 17:04, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alternately, are we able to obtain permission to use the Getty Images file? I believe that's a good picture Powerrranger (talk) 17:09, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is not reflected in the article yet that he is more active as far as I can see. I am loath to remove a free-use image, even if old, as they are so hard to get sometimes. As for YouTube videos, most are not free-use but those that are will have an explicit notice as part of the description releasing them usually under a Creative Commons license where they give permission that permits it. Need to look for that. Getty Images will not give permission for free-use. They sell images and permit some to be used for free for editorial purposes only, they won't permit derivative use which is one of the key things we require for an image to be free-use. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:21, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Adding images appears to be much more complicated than adding text. Any advice on how to get a free use image for the Ava Max page? She's a beautiful woman and that's an unflattering picture.. Powerrranger (talk) 23:13, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Search C:Commons for other images that may exist. Commons only accepts free-use images so anything found there is likely OK. If you can, take a picture with your own camera and donate to Commons. Other than that watch for fan images that may be properly licensed or the photographer may be willing to donate. We don't have the same problem with text as most of what is added to wikipedia is donated by the editors adding it. If we want to use other peoples words from other sources we have the same problems we have with images. Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:01, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

this free use? https://www.reddit.com/r/JonasBrothers/comments/bvzohq/frankie_jonas_deserves_extra_credit_who_agrees/ Geraldo Perez Powerrranger (talk) 15:44, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see nothing at that link the identified the photographer or makes any statement about releasing it with a license that permits free use. Photographs are presumed copyrighted with restrictions on use absent any statement by the copyright owner, the photographer usually, that give permission on usage. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:17, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important notices regarding editing in certain topic areas

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

-- Neutrality^talk 21:50, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

talk to me in that article's talk page. I will take this "does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date" quite literally because there are several mainstream articles discussing a conflict of interest between other editors who edit that Pete Buttigieg page, whereas my edits only promote neutrality. Powerrranger (talk) 23:23, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]