User talk:Postdlf/Archive33

Orphaned non-free image File:The Spirit 10.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Spirit 10.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Category:Dynasty (TV series) has been nominated for discussion

Category:Dynasty (TV series), which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 15:54, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Endemic

Hi there Postdlf, let me thank you for your interest in anoles and especially the great pictures you have uploaded. But no, that is not how "endemic" should be used. Generally the natural distribution is considered when considering endemism, not the modern extant distribution. It works the other way too, a plant or animal remains endemic to particular place irrespective of where humans have spread it recently. I should really rewrite the article on endemism one day -the concept is constantly used in the wrong way here on Wikipedia -it's a bit of a pet peeve, but "endemism" has a specific meaning, by confusing that one deprecates the word. Note the word has a different meanings in medicine as opposed to biology. In this specific case the text states it is native to Saint Martin and Anguilla, therefore it is by definition not an endemic of either island. Also, you'll note none of the sources use that terminology either for this species. So I will revert you. Cheers, Leo Breman (talk) 20:10, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi Leo, was there a project talk page discussion on that somewhere? Because the way you are interpreting that word is not what I am seeing in dictionary definitions, as well as how it has been used throughout Wikipedia (not just the article endemism, but also the category structure, Category:Endemic fauna). So if everyone is using it differently than you think it should be used, there should be a discussion to determine consensus before you start editing against that usage. Where do you think might be the best place for that discussion? postdlf (talk) 21:21, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Hmmm, I'm not sure what dictionaries you are using. I will look up some definitions for you if you like. Or we can have the discussion, maybe at tree of life? -that's broad. Distributions and taxonomy are the two things which are sort of my speciality, although anyone can say that, of course. Wikipedia is, of course, a bad source, how people use a word here doesn't denote validity. The use of the word in articles about cats was especially excruciating to me -I couldn't be bothered to correct that. I have a theory on why Wikipedia editors have often used the word incorrectly (Polbot!), but let's not go into that. At a glance Category:Endemic fauna appears correct. When we say "Turkey has a 40% rate of endemism in plants", that means that 40% of the plants (natively) only occur there. If a plant were to occur in both Turkey and Syria, say, then the sentence "fooplant is endemic to Turkey and Syria" is an oxymoron, because the plant is then endemic to neither Turkey nor Syria.

Also, logically, if I am right about the usage of the terminology then I have corrected incorrect text; if I am wrong, then my version of the text is correct either way -so the edit is good in both cases.

I am happy to discuss this more broadly! Say the word and I will start a discussion. Cheers, Leo Breman (talk) 21:45, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Files listed for discussion

Some of your images or media files have been listed for discussion. Please see Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 February 21 if you are interested in preserving their usage.

Thank you. ƏXPLICIT 01:46, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Strange Tales 28.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Strange Tales 28.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Infobox photo discussion

Hi. Can you offer your opinion on which of two photos is preferable in this discussion? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 15:41, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Strange Tales 28.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Strange Tales 28.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Avengers 144.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Avengers 144.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

SCOTUS infobox with "Statement" in the opinion author section

Could you please add "Statement" in the opinion author section of the infobox, since such a bench opinion has been issued? Kart2401real (talk) 17:04, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

You've already made that request on the template's talk page. Given that the case in question with a one-in-twenty-years kind of opinion is in the per curiam term list and does not have a standalone article, this infobox won't even be used to cover it. postdlf (talk) 19:25, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

I just created a standalone article for this case. Thompson v. Hebdon was the first major campaign finance case to make it to SCOTUS since Citizens United v. FEC. Kart2401real (talk) 15:42, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

The content certainly doesn't justify a split from the term list right now (nor do see it demonstrated that this was a "major" case), and I don't know that it ever will given the brevity of the opinion. But you do you. postdlf (talk) 17:39, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

What if a second statement bench opinion is released this term? Kart2401real (talk) 18:59, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Photo use

May we use your photo https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Anolis_cristatellus_in_Picard,_Dominica-2012_02_01_0242.JPG to illustrate a hint to our article http://www.salamandra-journal.com/index.php/home/contents/2010-vol-46/97-hahn-m-g-koehler/file on our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/DGHTeV/? We would also add the licence text from the Wikipedia licence generator: Postdlf (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Anolis_cristatellus_in_Picard,_Dominica-2012_02_01_0242.JPG), „Anolis cristatellus in Picard, Dominica-2012 02 01 0242“, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/legalcode Thanks in advance!

2003:C0:3732:2F95:139:F0CF:E307:99E1 (talk) 13:29, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Strange Tales 28.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Strange Tales 28.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Copy editors

Hi Postdlf: I've expanded, added sources to, and improved the List of American copy editors article a bit. Feel free to chip in if interested. Cheers, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:39, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Revert

Hi, the list of people addition you just reverted...There are actual people/actors in the list. But I will defer to you. Lightburst (talk) 21:42, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

That's incidental to describing the characters, however; it's not organized as a list of cast members. Note also it's already in the delsort for lists; it should only be in one or the other, not both. postdlf (talk) 21:45, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Come Back to the 5 & Dime, Jimmy Dean, Jimmy Dean (film)

Hi, thanks for noting the correct film title on this page. I have moved both the film and the play pages to the correct title, and edited the title in both those articles. However, I haven't checked the way it's written in every single source. Yoninah (talk) 13:54, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

@Yoninah: That wasn't me, I merely added a wikilink.[1] postdlf (talk) 14:40, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2019 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Clarence Thomas

added links pointing to Asylum and Administrative Procedure Act

2019 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Samuel Alito

added links pointing to Asylum and Administrative Procedure Act

2019 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Elena Kagan

added a link pointing to Administrative Procedure Act

2019 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Ruth Bader Ginsburg

added a link pointing to Administrative Procedure Act

2019 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Sonia Sotomayor

added a link pointing to Asylum

2019 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Stephen Breyer

added a link pointing to Asylum

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:11, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Category:Television series by network has been nominated for renaming

Category:Television series by network has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 11:02, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Seven years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:03, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

New Mexico

I see that User:Postdlf/NMSC and User:Postdlf/NMSC 2 have been around for quite some time. Let's fix up List of justices of the New Mexico Supreme Court to incorporate these. I still don't have a complete collection of judges needing articles! BD2412 T 00:33, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Category:Coos County, New Hampshire has been nominated for deletion

Category:Coos County, New Hampshire has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. jp×g 05:13, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

MEOW

Omniscientmoose42 (talk) 18:55, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

DYK for List of memoirs by first ladies of the United States

On 15 December 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article List of memoirs by first ladies of the United States, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that several memoirs by first ladies of the United States have outsold books written by their presidential husbands? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, List of memoirs by first ladies of the United States), and it may be added to the statistics page if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Category:The WB network affiliates has been nominated for deletion

Category:The WB network affiliates has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 08:51, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

Category:Municipalities in the United States has been nominated for renaming

Category:Municipalities in the United States has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:53, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

"Valley View Elementary School" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Valley View Elementary School. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 27#Valley View Elementary School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. —Granger (talk · contribs) 18:29, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

@Mx. Granger: I'm not sure why I was notified about this, I just closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valley View Elementary School as redirect per the consensus there. postdlf (talk) 19:19, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Alsophis manselli

What's up with that? As far as I can see, this is not a synonym for Alsophis antillensis, but a separate species? --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 23:18, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

It had been a redirect for 11 years until someone blanked it, so I reverted back to the redirect. We’re discussing now how to develop all of this. postdlf (talk) 01:20, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

More like you haven't bothered to do anything. I've shown you it's a separate species. Please restore my revision. Ddum5347 (talk) 16:47, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Unless you have specific information to the contrary, it certainly looks like a currently recognized species: CoL, Reptile Database, IUCN. That's not to say that blanking the redirect was in any way a reasonable thing to do (was there some kind of magical thinking that that just makes it disappear from mainspace or something?). Unless there are good reasons not to, I'll convert the redirect to a taxoboxed species stub - all right? --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 20:20, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Sounds good. Thanks a lot. Ddum5347 (talk) 21:29, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

First lady memoirs

Hi Postdlf, I've nominated List of memoirs by first ladies of the United States for FL. You created it, would you like to be added as a co-nom? Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:34, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Sorting opinions on 2020 term SCOTUS opinions page.

I believe Edwards v. Vannoy and a few other recent cases aren't sorted appropriately for concurrences/dissents. I can't figure out the system on the template page. Do you mind correcting them? – JocularJellyfish ^Talk_Contribs 18:35, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, I haven't had time for Wikipedia recently, when I do I'll review that page and make any fixes needed. postdlf (talk) 21:44, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Category:Nantucket, Massachusetts has been nominated for discussion

Category:Nantucket, Massachusetts has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 22:55, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Eight years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:18, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Nathan Edmondson

Hi. I know you haven't been active for the past couple of months, but my attempts to get others to help regarding an editor blanking content from the Nathan Edmondson article, and refusing to discuss the matter, have only been slightly successful. I've contacted three other admins, and put messages on the WikiComics Project talk page, and only two other editors have so far responded. Since you've participated in disputes regarding comics articles before, can you offer your views in the discussions? My analysis of the blanking, which I did at the request of another editor who alerted me to the problem, is here. The subsequent RfC began here. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 18:16, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Category:United States law has been nominated for renaming

Category:United States law has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Thesmp (talk) 16:17, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Koh Masaki

This article was deleted because there was a consensus that it failed the WP:PORNBIO criteria, partly because the criteria were written with a degree of US-bias. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Koh_Masaki I noticed today the WP:PORNBIO criteria have been removed.

Also there is substantial new material in addition to the ones listed before, including a book published by the University of Michigan Press in 2021 which refers to him on 20 pages, eight additional gay magazines where the magazines have an entry in Wikipedia, and the Taiwanese Government who use him to promote a safer sex message.

I think at a minimum we need to reconsider whether we should have an article.

I am told the first step in reinstating an article is to contact the administrator, who I believe is you. Dan88888 (talk) 18:37, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Higgins Boys and Gruber

The article The Higgins Boys and Gruber has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable sketch show, zero sourcing found

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:01, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Talk:Founding Fathers of the United States#RFC on Continental Association​

As a major editor of the article this may be of interest. Randy Kryn (talk) 13:56, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

New administrator activity requirement

The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.

Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:

1. Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
2. Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period

Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.

22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:10, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

List of fictional deities (2nd nomination)

An AFD you participated in is now restarted by the same nominator as last time. All past participates are being contacted.Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional deities (2nd nomination) Dream Focus 16:32, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Category:New York (state) state courts has been nominated for renaming

Category:New York (state) state courts has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 10:59, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Category:New York (state) state case law has been nominated for renaming

Category:New York (state) state case law has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 09:45, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Category:Villages in New York (state) has been nominated for renaming

Category:Villages in New York (state) has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ~TPW 17:08, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

"Hitler house" article

Hello @Postdlf, I was about to start the article Hitler house, but was notified that it had been deleted in 2011 by you, and I was prompted therefore to message you if I were to continue and recreate the page. Please advise, and thanks in advance! :) HenryTemplo 14:52, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Postdlf!

Happy New Year!

Postdlf,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 05:27, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 05:27, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

File:The Saturday Press.gif listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Saturday Press.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. HouseBlaster^talk 23:53, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Category:WarnerMedia has been nominated for merging

Category:WarnerMedia has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. InfiniteNexus (talk) 16:57, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Category:Russian tsars has been nominated for renaming

Category:Russian tsars has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Laurel Lodged (talk) 08:45, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Seduction of the Innocent UK.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Seduction of the Innocent UK.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. 廣九直通車 (talk) 07:09, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kyle MacLachlan Dune.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kyle MacLachlan Dune.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Small Request

Hello, I've been cleaning up and addressing fostered content WP:LINT syntax errors, and see that you have one on your userpage. If you would, would you change

{| width=100% bgcolor=white border-collapse:collapse

===Articles I created===

to

{| width=100% bgcolor=white border-collapse:collapse
|
===Articles I created===

This exact change will clear this issue. Thank you! Zinnober9 (talk) 03:28, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Category:Latin texts has been nominated for renaming

Category:Latin texts has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 18:10, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Category:Photographic collections and books has been nominated for splitting

Category:Photographic collections and books has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Paul_012 (talk) 13:44, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Category:National Broadcasting Company has been nominated for renaming

Category:National Broadcasting Company has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 17:57, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jane Arden.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jane Arden.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Category:Legendary creatures has been nominated for merging

Category:Legendary creatures has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:46, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Category:Legendary creatures has been nominated for merging

Category:Legendary creatures has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:10, 2 June 2024 (UTC)