User talk:PorothanSaomper

January 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Philadelphia Eagles has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Philadelphia Eagles was changed by PorothanSaomper (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.974599 on 2016-01-02T20:03:03+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:03, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Great Smog has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Great Smog was changed by PorothanSaomper (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.869422 on 2016-06-28T05:01:55+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:01, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Hello, I'm Ilyushka88. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Laurence Kettle— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ilyushka88 | ^Talk! _Contribs 19:23, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Ilyushka88, you may be blocked from editing. Ilyushka88 | ^Talk! _Contribs 19:33, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Pinkbeast (talk) 04:22, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of David Arthur Barenboim

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on David Arthur Barenboim requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 20:14, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Loser (novel) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Loser (novel) was changed by PorothanSaomper (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.940103 on 2016-10-18T04:52:21+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:52, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm -glove-. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ramesses II‎ have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -glove- (talk) 00:58, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 03:38, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PorothanSaomper (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My friend has been hacking into my account recently. I have made 1 edit and it was helpful since you did not change it back. Please give me editing or else I would personally sue that hacker who I personally know.

Decline reason:

Once an account has been compromised by a hacker, it cannot be unblocked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:16, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PorothanSaomper (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My computer was glitching, then aliens abducted my computer and edited it. They are bad boys right guys? PorothanSaomper (talk) 04:33, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Aliens are subject to the same rules here as ordinary humans, Superman, The Great Twizzle (wizard extraordinaire), and anyone else. While our Checkusers can identify individual computers, Wikipedia admins cannot tell whose fingers or tentacles actually pressed the keys. You may sue the hacker, but I think that by mentioning it you may well have also invoked WP:NLT which could be another reason for the block to stand. Peridon (talk) 12:42, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.