User talk:Pornfan

Please do not post links to the same website to multiple articles. -- The Anome (talk) 14:18, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi there, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thanks for responding on my talk page. The general policy is to avoid linking closely-related articles from a single source, to prevent self-promotion. Although I can see that you were editing in good faith, linking to articles you wrote yourself, or a website you have a personal or commercial involvement in, is generally regarded as a bad thing. However, please don't be discouraged: everyone makes mistakes at first, and no-one will think any worse of you. -- The Anome (talk) 14:35, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Gianna Michaels has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Avnjay^Talk 14:34, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 14:54, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Stormy Daniels

I've reverted your edit to Stormy Daniels. Unfortunately, Wikipedia cannot accept material that isn't from reliable sources, and a personal email isn't sufficient. – iridescent 18:07, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Welcome!

You might want to swing by Wikipedia:WikiProject Pornography, which governs the various articles on pornography. There you can find advice on how these articles should be shaped. Tabercil (talk) 22:43, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Lisa De Leeuw

I reverted your edits to Lisa De Leeuw because the sources cited are not WP:RELIABLE. As suggested above, please check out WikiProject Pornography for guidelines and editor consensus about sourcing. Lisadeleuw.com is not "her site." It is a fan site at best. IMDb "biography" (more correctly trivia) sections are user contributed. They are not considered reliable sources. • Gene93k (talk) 20:45, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Charlotte Stokely

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did to Charlotte Stokely, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Vinh1313 (talk) 21:35, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

This seems extreme to me. I pointed out that she did 106 films in 2005-2007, but that she is currently available for softcore work only (by linking to her agent's website). I pointed to some pictures of her modeling swimsuits. I could have also pointed out that she has let her aids test expire, but I didn't. I could have pointed to discussion of her possible retirement on a fan site, but I didn't. For this I get a warning that I will possibly be blocked from further editing? I don't understand. If I had referenced discussion on AdultDVDtalk.com where her fans say she might be retiring, would this have then been acceptable. (I simply made the unreferenced statement that some of her fans suspect she is retiring.) How is wikipedia improved by keeping its readers ignorant of these simple facts?

Hi Pornfan. Yes, the warning was a little harsh. A friendly note may have been better. The Warning poster probably looked at all the other friendly notes posted on the talk page and figured it was time for a warning. Someone else may have approached the situation differently. Wikipedia is not so straight forward and has unusual reference rules. Charlotte Stokely agent's website is not an source that is independent from Charlotte Stokely and thus not an appropriate citation for Wikipedia. Instead of pointing out that she has let her aids test expire, you could just state the date of her last aids test and reference the public document about her aids test. That lets the reader come to their own conclusions. Discussion on AdultDVDtalk are not Wikipedia reliable sources. Articles should rely on reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. See Wikipedia:Reliable_sources#Overview. Mostly, this means paper print media (New York Times, Wallstreet Journal, AVN (magazine)). Fan discussion about Charlotte Stokely would belong in an article Fans of Charlotte Stokely if such an article were viable for Wikipedia, but not necessarily in the Charlotte Stokely article itself. Bebestbe (talk) 15:25, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Pornography

Hi Pornfan. From your posts, you may be interested in joining WikiProject Pornography. Please check it out. Bebestbe (talk) 15:14, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Alektra Blue

Let me get this straight... you have talked to Alektra Blue personally, and she told you she was recently divorced??? Zonafan39 (talk) 04:40, 12 July 2010 (UTC)