User talk:Pontiff Of Bread

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lord Breadbear (April 24)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Blaze Wolf was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Wikipedia is not for writing your own stories.

― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 13:33, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Pontiff Of Bread! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:33, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Lord Breadbear

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Lord Breadbear, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 13:34, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Lord Breadbear

Draft:Lord Breadbear, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Lord Breadbear and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Lord Breadbear during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 06:03, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

If this discussion is closed with a deletion of your draft, Pontiff Of Bread, further introduction of similar (or generally unverifiable) material, or the creation of another draft that lacks any kind of citations, is likely to lead to a block from editing. This is because, while significant leniency is granted to new editors, you are now expected to be aware of at very least the verifiability policy and that Wikipedia is not a webhost for fiction or cult websites. Knowingly ignoring such cummunity concerns is disruptive and will be prevented. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:01, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

A formal warning

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:02, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Cullen328 (talk) 23:29, 25 April 2023 (UTC)