User talk:Pongsong

Hi, Please don't revert edits to the Lavasa page. You are removing cited material! Adding material to the page is encouraged, and you are free to remove anything that is not supported by a citation. Thanks, Fleetham (talk) 22:06, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Pongsong, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! – 29611670.x (talk) 05:56, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lavasa

Welcome! I wanted to let you know I undid your edit to Lavasa—partially because you did not explain why you were removing sections, but also because some citations seem to have been lost along the way. I see that you dispute whether some content should remain in the article, but please try to make sure citations of unrelated content remain. Thanks, – 29611670.x (talk) 06:02, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Lavasa, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Thomas.W (talk) 07:59, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Lavasa, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Thomas.W (talk) 18:03, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at Lavasa, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Thomas.W (talk) 10:55, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of a week for abusing multiple accounts. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:23, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Block extended to a month for evasion as an IP. Jafeluv (talk) 11:05, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pongsong. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Rs chen 7754 13:29, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]