User talk:Polmags

Image copyright problem with Image:Rivermaya2007.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rivermaya2007.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:15, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Voice of the Philippines

Since each 2 artists per team's vote percentage were not revealed, adding the vote percentage per artist will not be necessary.--AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 17:03, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And it makes the tables ugly. Literally. Unless each vote percentage per artist was revealed, then that's okay.--AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 17:06, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that you only wanted to help with the article, but the thing you are doing does not make the article look good. Try to visit other The Voice articles, specifically the US seasons, and you will see vote percentages are not included in the 'results' column and even the Live shows summary table. As what I said before, we can only add the vote percentage per artist if ever all of the vote percentages were revealed. The table will look inconsistent if some artists' vote percentages were not revealed.

And there was no edit war going on in The Biggest Loser UK series 5, the admin got it wrong. I am patrolling The Biggest Loser articles since most of the TBL articles are being vandalized for more than a year now. I reverted the article to its pre-vandalized version and he thought that the thing I was doing was edit war. I have already explained the situation to him. So that is not an issue. The admin and I are okay now.

Please do not add those vote percentages anymore. I will revert them back if you continue to do that. Thanks.--AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 08:58, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. First, the fifth column in the results table of The Voice of Holland (season 1) were the accumulated points of each of the artist. And hey, the tables used there were the old ones. What we have here are the "Updated ones". I have plans for that. I have made a better table format for that issue (See here: User:Renzoy16/sandbox5#Week 5 (September 22) and its much better than the table used in the US version: The Voice (U.S. season 1)#Semifinals: Week 3 (June 21 & 22) --- the songs, results, and points are consolidated in my improved version). You see, when we have more unnecessary tables that makes the article uglier. If it is needed we add it; if the information is needed but the table is not needed then we need to make other ways to add those info. I know that you will continue adding those vote percentages, so I decided to make a fix. I hope that will appease you now.--AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 18:11, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello. I have once again reverted your attempts to include the 73K bytes of unsourced material about the various episodes of Got to Believe in the article. Your edits are clearly disruptive, for several reasons, one of which is that the system can't handle inclusions of that size, resulting in just a garbled display of meaningless text. Another reason is that we don't include complete articles in other articles, just a pointer to them. So stop trying to add the list/article, or you risk being blocked for disruptive editing. Thomas.W ^{talk to me} 09:13, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Thomas.W: Everything is working well on that page the last time I checked and I even tested it on the other browsers. And which one are you talking about here -- "..we don't include complete articles in other articles, just a pointer to them. So stop trying to add the list/article.."? Just to inform you, you also removed a section about the "Soundtrack" which was added by another user. Also, there are several corrections I did on the Cast and Character names which were basically sourced out from the episode itself. Please take notice first the edit/changes before you do a massive revert.

See Wikipedia's rules about reliable sources and verifiability. All material that is challenged or likely to be challenged must be properly sourced, to reliable sources, all material that is unsourced can be removed, and it's up to the person who adds the material to make sure that the material is properly sourced/referenced. Because Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a fanblog. Thomas.W ^{talk to me} 09:35, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Thomas.W: Revert the page to the last edit I made and identify to me one by one everything that you are challenging me to prove. Then, I will indicate and provide the "reliable sources" on each items. Are you woking for Wikipedia?

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]