User talk:Politicalguy1234

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Politicalguy1234, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Beersheba. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Marek.69 ^talk 22:50, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Incidents in the 2008–2009 Israel–Gaza conflict, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Incidents in the 2008–2009 Israel–Gaza conflict was changed by Politicalguy1234 (u) (t) deleting 8781 characters on 2009-02-03T17:49:32+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:49, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} Cluebot has marked an edit of mine as vandalism which it clearly was not (see discussion page there). However I cant access the report false positive page.

Hi! It would appear that the false-positive report system is currently unavailable, so you might like to leave a note at the bottom of the instructions page, like several other people have done: User:ClueBot/FalsePositives. Stwalkerster [ talk ] 18:33, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not revert my edits without bothering to check the discussion page where you would have seen that there is no vandalism!

Politicalguy1234 (talk) 18:16, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An edit that removes significant portions of sourced content, without any explanation in the edit summary, from a new editor with under a dozen edits, on an article that has been the subject of a tremendous amount of contentious argument, is one that raises a red flag for vandalism. After reviewing your explanation referencing your discussion on the article's take page, I agree that your edit was not vandalism and I have removed the warning that was left above. Please be sure to use an edit summary on all edits, but be especially careful to do so on edits where significant portions of the article are being removed, as was the case here. Alansohn (talk) 19:46, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]