User talk:Poewag

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Speakup.jpeg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Speakup.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vladlen Manilov ✉ / 05:22, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I can't edit it but i have permission to use it Poewag (talk) 17:52, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Salem Imam per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Salem Imam. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit _(blether) 16:32, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know who he is! Poewag (talk) 16:52, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can i know why i got blocked? I don't know who is salem imam Poewag (talk) 17:02, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What about Ayaelmelegy? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:03, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it's my old account. I used it to write the article and it was the first time for me to use Wikipedia. Since then i have been reading and practicing on how to write articles and so on and made this account becuse i couldn't unblock the old one Poewag (talk) 18:18, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I sent unblock request from the other account Would you please assist:) Poewag (talk) 18:53, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Poewag (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

reason i have no relatives to the other account

Decline reason:

A simple denial is not sufficient to overturn a block based on behavioral and technical evidence. PhilKnight (talk) 18:18, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Poewag (talk) 16:54, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not denying anything!i don't know who is salem imam and he is not related to me. As i explained i had only one account before called ayaelmelegy Poewag (talk) 18:21, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for acknowledging that account. You are blocked because that account is blocked - you are not permitted to edit through other accounts, or through IP addresses, and you have clearly been doing both. The only legitimate way for you to resume editing here would be for you to successfully appeal the block on that account. Girth Summit _(blether) 18:57, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you I already sent a request and i honestly never knew it's forbidden to create another account. Can you please assist with the appeal on ayaelmelegy account? Poewag (talk) 19:00, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will leave your unblock requests for another admin to review. I will leave some notes there with some information for the reviewer. Girth Summit _(blether) 19:08, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Poewag (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I DON'T KNOW WHO IS SALEM IMAM Poewag (talk) 18:23, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Mrjohnaytedvx, Ayaelmelegy, and you are all on the same IP, and you've all edited articles about Gehad Hamdy. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:17, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I had only another account called ayaelmelegy and i have been practicing for months to follow the criteria and so on. Why i am blocked now? Poewag (talk) 18:23, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But salemimam is not me and not with my ip address!

Poewag (talk) 19:32, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Speakup.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Speakup.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:19, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]