User talk:Poems of borns

Hello, Poems of borns, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 04:53, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Adding reference to Wikipedia articles

Hello Poems of borns! Please do not forget to add references from reliable sources for the content you add to Wikipedia. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Adding a well formatted references is very easy to do.

While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a toolbar which says "cite" click on it
Then click on "templates",
Choose the most appropriate template and fill as many details as you can,

This will add a well formatted reference that would be helpful in case the website link (web URL) becomes inactive (dead/link rot) after some time. You can read more about it on Help:Edit toolbar or see this video File:RefTools.ogv. thanks and regards --Kautilya3 (talk) 17:35, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

to use this message place {{subst:User:DBigXray/ref}} on User_talk

Om Beach

Indeed normal users can't delete an article. They may, however, change an article on a non-notable subject to a redirect. As you are well aware, this is a thoroughly dull stretch of sand about which there is nothing to say and a redirect serves well. If you are stupid enough to revert the edit I will simply list it an AfD.TheLongTone (talk) 14:22, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is an article on adjacent Kudle beach which is much less notable than om beach. It is notable and trending well in google trends https://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=om%20beach%2C%20kudle%20beach&geo=IN&cmpt=q&tz=Etc%2FGMT-5%3A30 And changing article into redirect is nothing but deletion which normal users cant do. You can try speedy deletion template for which admin will decide, which i wont be able to revert. Poems of borns (talk) 15:30, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:OTHERSTUFF. Timewaster.TheLongTone (talk) 14:21, 14 January 2016 (UTC)≤[reply]

Proposed deletion of Thattekere

The article Thattekere has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable place.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. | Naypta^✉ opened his mouth at 06:37, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hampi, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Musical, Motif and Aqueduct. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sarala Devi Chaudhurani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Congress Party. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Other side of the story listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Other side of the story. Since you had some involvement with the Other side of the story redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 16:47, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Images in Thattekere article

Hello, I do not believe it is appropriate to have two images in the Thattekere article. In the beginning, I deleted the image without discussion because 1) the article is very short and there is no space for two photos, 2) the image in the infobox provides sufficient visualisation of the village and 3) there is no point in having two highly similar photos in the article. I see no reason whatsoever to have the additional photo in the article and did not anticipate my deleting of it to be a big problem. Please tell me why you feel otherwise. Thanks — Sunnya343✈ (háblame • my work) 00:51, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I believe adding another pic is adds value to the article. Poems of borns (talk) 04:46, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, I did not see your response here. If you could please elaborate on this value. To me, the additional image looks pretty much the same as the one in the infobox. Also, the article is so short that the second image awkwardly appears next to the infobox and in the References section. — Sunnya343✈ (háblame • my work) 04:53, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied only today. The second pic shows forest in the background, unlike the other pic. Please refrain from further revert, otherwise you will be blocked on technical grounds of wp:3rr. Poems of borns (talk) 06:55, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Hello, I'm Filpro. I noticed that you recently removed some content from List of Indian states and union territories by GDP per capita without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Filpro (talk) 21:50, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Poems of borns. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 29 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Siridao page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Poems of borns. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Penis cola" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Penis cola and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 13#Penis cola until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Capsulecap ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:52, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]